|
By:
300 of our shops are losing money, so why havnt they been closed
|
|
By:
With the big firms making similar decisions it looks as if they know its bad news come budget day.
|
|
By:
The Chancellor is a clueless chancer who running out ideas of who to steal from
|
|
By:
They've been "shipping out" completely of their own accord (and especially from the Bricks & Mortar model) for a long time tbf. Way before the white-paper and way before somebody eventually (finally!) decided that the 2005 Gambling Act might actually be applicable to the Gambling Industry!
Grabbing a share of the huge and lucrative US market has been their primary focus and their absolute priority for a long time. It's been a happy coincidence (in terms of attributing blame) and very good optics for them, that since the 2005 Gambling Act suddenly (belatedly) came into force just a few years ago and now the prospect of tax rises; that they had long ago given up on the UK High Street and were already focussed on much bigger international markets. Does anybody believe that they will actually be opening physical shops in their newly targeted territories (even if regulation is lighter touch and taxes are low)??? |
|
By:
Reeves keeps going on about the wealthy 'paying their fair share of taxes' but 10% of the population
pay 60% of tax. Perhaps she should reduce taxes for them if she wants them to pay 'their fair share'! The trouble with this mob in power is that they haven't two clues to click when it comes to just about anything, let alone high finance. |
|
By:
"300 of our shops are losing money, so why havnt they been closed" Someone will answer this better than me ( or maybe not ) but you do get big discounts on stuff like pictures depending on number of shops. Also high street presence is an advert in itself for people playing on-line keeps you in minds.
|
|
By:
If Fred cannot make it pay then ALL Indies such as Jennings, Chisholms, Corbetts will be in severe trouble (no internet to bail them).
The larger firms will close en-masse, meaning your nearest LBO could be upto 10 mile away. The job losses in the industry will be massive (more people for the state to support) and the income lost to racing will be enormous. The proposed tax model never worked in the Netherlands and cannot work in the UK The overall profile of an LBO in the UK is that it is in decline caused by afforability checks, customer demographics (no one replacing the £20 a race punter who died)and the cost of living crisis forcing people to curtail their leisue spend, the smoking ban, the growth of the internet and High St 24/7 amusement arcades. I would agree with the chap in the RP who said "We are on the Titanic and now they're going to take away the lifeboats" The 26th of November could be a catastrofic day for both the UK horse and greyhound industries, let alone your local LBO. |
|
By:
"300 of our shops are losing money, so why havnt they been closed" Someone will answer this better than me ( or maybe not ) but you do get big discounts on stuff like pictures depending on number of shops. Also high street presence is an advert in itself for people playing on-line keeps you in minds.
It's more expensive to shutter in many cases. A location may be making a net loss, but that's on the net profit line. Disposing of a location has capital losses, and for example the wider business has to pay redundancies, administration etc. There may be sunk costs in many cases (eg leases). |
|
By:
As none of the so called Bookmakers will take a bet from me in their Shops I don't give a toss.
|
|
By:
Dont call Racheal
The Chancellor Shes from accounts Couldnt orgainze a church MEETING ![]() |