It wasn't, it was two inches and when the stewards watch it that's what will be in their heads, the impression of what they are looking at and not the official distance.IMO
It wasn't, it was two inches and when the stewards watch it that's what will be in their heads, the impression of what they are looking at and not the official distance.IMO
from what i seen on RTV it looked like winners comes 5-6yds right and as 2nd was closing last 50-60yds the jockey has to momentarily ease and it looked like it was beaten a few inches..thort 101 to be disq..heard the com showing hd on as was typing stewards in forum thort al wind back..only RTV didnt show hd on and then sed was a hd.
from what i seen on RTV it looked like winners comes 5-6yds right and as 2nd was closing last 50-60yds the jockey has to momentarily ease and it looked like it was beaten a few inches..thort 101 to be disq..heard the com showing hd on as was typing s
After getting shafted at Killarney a few years ago when I backed the winner by nearly two lengths.I was astounded when there was a Stewards. As no contact had been made I topped up at 1.3 on the Inquiry. Needless to say,the horse was disqualified in favour of a locally trained gambled on horse
After getting shafted at Killarney a few years ago when I backed the winner by nearly two lengths.I was astounded when there was a Stewards.As no contact had been made I topped up at 1.3 on the Inquiry.Needless to say,the horse was disqualified in fa
As it was a £6,000 loss it wasn't a disaster. I used to record bets but just do a daily and weekly P&L except for chunky pre race bets which are getting fewer now
As it was a £6,000 loss it wasn't a disaster.I used to record bets but just do a daily and weekly P&L except for chunky pre race bets which are getting fewer now