Had an ante post bet on Aeronautic in the Ebor; he was balloted out but treated as a loser and I've lost my money. Jockey Club rule 121 states that bets on horses compulsorily withdrawn must be treated as void and stakes returned. Despite complaining Fred won't listen. Has anyone else had problems getting money back on balloted out horses with any other bookmaker?
Did you bet online or high street? If it was the former email head office for clarification or confirmation? If it was the latter ask to speak to a manager. If this was to no avail email head office for clarification?
Any horse balloted out (not withdrawn) one's stake is returned.
Did you bet online or high street? If it was the former email head office for clarification or confirmation? If it was the latter ask to speak to a manager. If this was to no avail email head office for clarification? Any horse balloted out (not with
Ante-post bets are accepted on the basis all-in run or not, entered or not.
Except where specifically stated otherwise, stakes are lost on an ante-post bet if a selection does not take part and no Tattersalls' Rule 4(c) deductions are made from winning ante-post bets.
https://www.betfred.com/help/bet-rules/horse-racingAnte-post bets are accepted on the basis all-in run or not, entered or not. Except where specifically stated otherwise, stakes are lost on an ante-post bet if a selection does not take part and no Ta
Meanwhile, over at https://helpcenter.paddypower.com/app/answers/detail/192-horse-racing---future-racing/....
If the horse is balloted out or eliminated under Jockey Club rules single bets will be void. In any such cases, accumulative Future Racing bets will stand on the remaining legs, at the prices laid on the selections in those races, with a double becoming a single, a treble becoming a double, etc.
Meanwhile, over at https://helpcenter.paddypower.com/app/answers/detail/192-horse-racing---future-racing/....If the horse is balloted out or eliminated under Jockey Club rules single bets will be void. In any such cases, accumulative Future Racing be
It was an online bet. Their rules actually include rule 121. I just want others to be aware (as if you didn't know), that not all bookmakers can be trusted.
It was an online bet. Their rules actually include rule 121. I just want others to be aware (as if you didn't know), that not all bookmakers can be trusted.
Not so much fun when 95% lose soccer is nearly as bad as the horses at this stage bunch of over paid ****s majority of whom can't play under pressure headless chickens
Not so much fun when 95% lose soccer is nearly as bad as the horses at this stage bunch of over paid ****s majority of whom can't play under pressure headless chickens
I actually win long term but Ante Post betting is rare and for small stakes only. Funnily enough my last winning A/P bet was Magical Zoe in last year's Ebor. I remember backing La Parisienne to win a nice sum in the Arc a few years ago. She was balloted out and, guess what, I got my money back.
I actually win long term but Ante Post betting is rare and for small stakes only. Funnily enough my last winning A/P bet was Magical Zoe in last year's Ebor. I remember backing La Parisienne to win a nice sum in the Arc a few years ago. She was ballo
You know when disgruntled Ryanair passengers say "We'll never fly with Ryanair again!", Michael O'Leary doesn't care does he because millions of others will.I'm saying I'll never bet with Fred again. He won't care, but maybe some of you will now look elsewhere before you do.
You know when disgruntled Ryanair passengers say "We'll never fly with Ryanair again!", Michael O'Leary doesn't care does he because millions of others will.I'm saying I'll never bet with Fred again. He won't care, but maybe some of you will now look
Pretty obvious you're dealing with some braindead loony who clearly doesn't understand the basic rules. Betting companies are full of them. Demand to speak to someone with intelligence.
Pretty obvious you're dealing with some braindead loony who clearly doesn't understand the basic rules. Betting companies are full of them. Demand to speak to someone with intelligence.
You'll get your stake back eventually if you don't give up. It's the hassle and time it takes to get it back that you'll lose. I'd post a review of your experience on Trustpilot.
I had an ew bet on someone for the top tryscorer with Freds and they finished joint 2nd. They applied a dead heat even though the ew terms were 3 or 4 places. They said the bet was settled correctly when I raised it initially. It just makes you want to bang your head against the wall.
You'll get your stake back eventually if you don't give up. It's the hassle and time it takes to get it back that you'll lose. I'd post a review of your experience on Trustpilot. I had an ew bet on someone for the top tryscorer with Freds and they
Years ago I got a tip for a horse, by the stable's head lad, for the Cesarewitch that was eventually balloted out. I had a grand on with Ladbrooks who refused to give me my money back so I phoned the Newmarket stable and they confirmed it was a void bet. Went back to the shop and asked to speak to Head Office and they gave me my money back. It ran in a 7 runner field 2 days later and had 1k @5/6 with Barry Dennis, my wife went to pick the winning up and he wouldn’t pay her because she didn’t put the bet on. She got the ring manager and came back with the money. Three separate punters came up to thank me as they changed their bets when they saw the size of mine.
You could phone or email Joseph O’Brien at the bottom of their website
Colm O’Rant,Years ago I got a tip for a horse, by the stable's head lad, for the Cesarewitch that was eventually balloted out. I had a grand on with Ladbrooks who refused to give me my money back so I phoned the Newmarket stable and they confirmed
Jockey Club Rule 121 decrees that stewards are empowered to reduce the numbers in a race if, at the overnight declaration stage, too many have been left in for the safety of horses and jockeys. Ante-post bets on horses compulsorily withdrawn in these circumstances will be void and stakes returned.
from betfred site .Jockey Club Rule 121 decrees that stewards are empowered to reduce the numbers in a race if, at the overnight declaration stage, too many have been left in for the safety of horses and jockeys. Ante-post bets on horses compulsorily
Whomever gave the green light to go ahead with their latest advert with the "cheeky chappie" Mickey Mouser wants tarred and feathering.
On a separate note about Done.Whomever gave the green light to go ahead with their latest advert with the "cheeky chappie" Mickey Mouser wants tarred and feathering.
They couldn’t possibly be able to sponsor all five Claasics if they gave ante-post punters their monies back, could they? There is a sure way of not getting fleeced ante-post which is to never, ever, bet ante-post. Absolute mugs game.
They couldn’t possibly be able to sponsor all five Claasics if they gave ante-post punters their monies back, could they?There is a sure way of not getting fleeced ante-post which is to never, ever, bet ante-post.Absolute mugs game.
Had a £10 ew on Famous Bridge for the GN and some days later was told by the shop manager the hose was ballotted out andthe bet was void in the till, I got my score back.
Was then daft enough to put the £10er ew on the nag in the Scottish GN, only for it to pull up.
Easy come, easy go.
Fred does return on balloted out horses.Had a £10 ew on Famous Bridge for the GN and some days later was told by the shop manager the hose was ballotted out andthe bet was void in the till, I got my score back.Was then daft enough to put the £10er
The big problem with the baldy welsher (and a large number of other outfits, Slybet being the most obvious) is that they pay peanuts. Well, you know what you get in that case. The major problem lies in the middle amnagement. Senior management don't want their positions challenged by any young ambitious whippersnappers. For that reason they employ middle managers of no great talent. In particular they us epeople who have no idea of what the business is and how it operates. They might as well be middle managers in a fish farm. They are just seen as "middle managers". Now the obvious, how can theses middle managers train the junior staff when they themselves are so clueless? Makes it all clear?
The big problem with the baldy welsher (and a large number of other outfits, Slybet being the most obvious) is that they pay peanuts. Well, you know what you get in that case. The major problem lies in the middle amnagement. Senior management don't w