Jun 11, 2025 -- 4:30PM, impossible123 wrote:
"11 runners and only 2 places paid E?W"That would mean the bookie is expecting at least 3 non-runners = 3 non-refundable antepost stakes = pure profit. Is this not sharp practice?
It’s wrong whatever you call it. But there’s lots of bookies on here so bound to not agree impossible.
Just talk biscuits and you’ll be alright!
Jun 11, 2025 -- 5:57PM, impossible123 wrote:
That's addiction and mentally incompetence 'Delashay'.
I’d seen it all in that little tote. Walked in after an armed robbery of which there were three during my time there!

Jun 11, 2025 -- 6:20PM, jimnast wrote:
Quite some post delashay 1815
It’s truth Jimnst having seen things for myself, first hand, I can talk from experience.


[:crazy:



Jun 11, 2025 -- 2:32PM, Delashay wrote:
Jun 10, 2025 -- 7:48PM, Andrew-In-Sweden wrote:The bookies are killing horseracing by not taking bets from recreational punters resulting in an ever-decreasing Levy contributionYou appear to have a disturbing resentment against UK bookmakers, not only based on the post above, but many others, possibly due to past losses perhaps. Far be it from me to act as a mediator, but you may be surprised to know that although turn-over is down and expected to decrease again, the bookmaker levy paid in March 2025 was £108 million, the highest figure since reform in 2017 and the 4th increase in a row.Levy payments 2023/24 £105m - 2022/23 £100m - 2021/22 £97m - 2020/21 £83mThe levy is based on bookmaker gross profit, not turn-over.Andrew he has a point if he dislikes them. Whether it’s down to losses or not, it isn’t the point. The SJP has been priced up and I see more and more of these place terms being offered. Imagine that you are a new comer to racing and you read the rules of placing a bet, then go to so and see this:From Billy Lills EW: 1/4 Odds 2 PlacesNo.
