What about the drink, drug and gambling in his line of work (football ) ??? Surprised he carrys on taking the money, you would think he would refrain on Moral grounds.!! WAC.
What about the drink, drug and gambling in his line of work (football ) ??? Surprised he carrys on taking the money, you would think he would refrain on Moral grounds.!! WAC.
Not a fan of him at all, obnoxious and arrogant to name a couple of reasons. It's incredulous a person can get so wealthy by doing what is essentially trading humans and their assets; he's not even a licensed agent and some of his dealings are known to be dubious at least. For legal protection, i use the term 'allegedly'.
GlasgowExactly, Black kettle etc. Not a fan of him at all, obnoxious and arrogant to name a couple of reasons. It's incredulous a person can get so wealthy by doing what is essentially trading humans and their assets; he's not even a licensed agent a
I'm sure he has a huge input, but 'you' is in the context of the show. Luck kept telling him what he was presuming Kia was thinking.
Kia was right in that sense, if Luck had another powerful owner on he would not be interrogating then like he was doing today. It was a completely different approach to the standard one.
I'm sure he has a huge input, but 'you' is in the context of the show. Luck kept telling him what he was presuming Kia was thinking. Kia was right in that sense, if Luck had another powerful owner on he would not be interrogating then like he was doi
Say what you like about Kia and he may well be a bright flame who burns out in time but racing has been a closed shop for too long. Speaks his mind and a breath of fresh air imo
Say what you like about Kia and he may well be a bright flame who burns out in time but racing has been a closed shop for too long. Speaks his mind and a breath of fresh air imo
Just watched my recording of this show - before I saw this thread.
Why on earth was Nick Luck so OTT? He would not let Kia finish a lot of his sentences.
One thing being wary of what a guest might say but another trying spoiling the interview.
Got to say that Luck is now often allowing his ego to come first rather than just ask questions and then listen to the answers. But, he probably has young young and thrusting producer in his ear trying to provoke controversy. I just do not understand why the younger generation appear to thrive on argument and conflict!
Just watched my recording of this show - before I saw this thread. Why on earth was Nick Luck so OTT? He would not let Kia finish a lot of his sentences. One thing being wary of what a guest might say but another trying spoiling the interview. Got to
Luck and his producer may well have scared of libel but two thigs in response to that.
1/ Luck did not allow Kia to talk about most things, however innocent, without trampling all over it.
2/ Why have a guest on that they surely would have known was likely to be a bit sparky??
To prover my point about Luck and his ego, watch the Talking Points bit closely every week. Not so much yesterday, but a lot of weeks, Luck sets up the talking point using up at least 30 seconds of the 2 minute talking time scheduled. to be fair, though, last week when that young lad presented it (his name escapes me now) it was daft. He was spending nearly 90 seconds setting up each of the talking points.
The art of interviewing is to allow the interviewee as much time as possible to answer.
Luck and his producer may well have scared of libel but two thigs in response to that. 1/ Luck did not allow Kia to talk about most things, however innocent, without trampling all over it. 2/ Why have a guest on that they surely would have known was
It wasn't just the alleged 'fear' of breaking the law.
He asked him if it was business or pleasure, answer was (paraphrasing) both. He must have proceeded to ask him another three or four times, claiming he wasn't getting an answer.
Kia took it pretty well on the outside, definitely had more than a veneer of an attack, rather than fact or interest finding. Which I alluded to, is not the usual MO on that show. This is the strategy you usually see from interviewers hoping to get click bait for social media.
It wasn't just the alleged 'fear' of breaking the law.He asked him if it was business or pleasure, answer was (paraphrasing) both. He must have proceeded to ask him another three or four times, claiming he wasn't getting an answer.Kia took it pretty
BALDING/GOSDEN aint goinks/workersg to change now listening to HOUGHTON, if balding/gosden get asked in future why are their jock,s/workers failing more tests,they,ll say because everyone else is testing them and we,re getting whats left , HOUGHTON wasnt asked the million $ ?,which would have been as you workers are tested would murphy with his record be tested if he rode out for her
BALDING/GOSDEN aint goinks/workersg to change now listening to HOUGHTON, if balding/gosden get asked in future why are their jock,s/workers failing more tests,they,ll say because everyone else is testing them and we,re getting whats left , HOUGHTON
BALDING/GOSDEN aint goinks/workersg to change now listening to HOUGHTON, if balding/gosden get asked in future why are their jock,s/workers failing more tests,they,ll say because everyone else is testing them and we,re getting whats left , HOUGHTON wasnt asked the million $ ?,which would have been as you workers are tested would murphy with his record be tested if he rode out for her
BALDING/GOSDEN aint goinks/workersg to change now listening to HOUGHTON, if balding/gosden get asked in future why are their jock,s/workers failing more tests,they,ll say because everyone else is testing them and we,re getting whats left , HOUGHTON
Yep, i thought it was a poor interview by Luck continually steering Kia away from interesting topics but taking him too far away, ended up becoming a Luck monologue.
Yep, i thought it was a poor interview by Luck continually steering Kia away from interesting topics but taking him too far away, ended up becoming a Luck monologue.
I have only watched it today. I thought it went OK for 10 minutes but then went downhill. How anyone who has made millions from "selling" football players can accuse racing of having poor moral standards compared to football is a sick joke. I was none the wiser about Joorabchian and his ambitions at the end of the half hour and I don't think that Nick Luck was either. He held up Coolmore as the high moral ground but on what criteria? Being good at deceiving the Racing public?
I have only watched it today. I thought it went OK for 10 minutes but then went downhill. How anyone who has made millions from "selling" football players can accuse racing of having poor moral standards compared to football is a sick joke. I was non
I just watched the whole interview and although I'm not the greatest fan of Nick Luck, I thought he did OK. Where's all the interrupting posters have been on about? Getting him to navigate round the elephant in the room, the accident-prone jockey, was no easy task. And KJ made good points about racing being a closed shop where the insiders all know what's going on but the the poor public don't.
I just watched the whole interview and although I'm not the greatest fan of Nick Luck, I thought he did OK. Where's all the interrupting posters have been on about? Getting him to navigate round the elephant in the room, the accident-prone jockey, wa
Barstewards pod this week, the main host said that there was about 10 scandals currently in racing that he knew about that have never seen the light of day.
Barstewards pod this week, the main host said that there was about 10 scandals currently in racing that he knew about that have never seen the light of day.
i thought kj came across well? luck tried painting him as a jockey and trainer sacker. kia pointed out very reasonably that hes had only 3 jockeys rossa kevin stott and david egan? and he said hes still friendly with all his ex trainers?
i thought kj came across well? luck tried painting him as a jockey and trainer sacker. kia pointed out very reasonably that hes had only 3 jockeys rossa kevin stott and david egan? and he said hes still friendly with all his ex trainers?
duffy 26 May 25 16:39 It's normally repeated on Tuesday night's...not scheduled this week though!!
It is on as per usual, and not the for the first time a pain in the arris for anyone wishing to record The Verdict / Replay
duffy 26 May 25 16:39 It's normally repeated on Tuesday night's...not scheduled this week though!!It is on as per usual, and not the for the first time a pain in the arris for anyone wishing to record The Verdict / Replay
* just to clarify, that is the schedule not being listed correctly for recording purposes, not that Luck's show is being repeated again
The schedule timings weren't correct on Saturday night either, with the 'Full SP' carrying on until 11.30 pm.
* just to clarify, that is the schedule not being listed correctly for recording purposes, not that Luck's show is being repeated again The schedule timings weren't correct on Saturday night either, with the 'Full SP' carrying on until 11.30 pm.
tony Calvin bed wetting about KIA crossing the libel line everyone no,s murphy was arrested even ITV went there balding has been putting him up since, that's all KIA said without naming them,balding/murphy aren't taking anyone to court for saying what's in the racing publics name, tony Calvin.lucky are just proving KIA,s point is correct and like some on here CALVIN went on to ? KIA,s ethics in football,instead of addressing the MURPHY/BALDING situation
tony Calvin bed wetting about KIA crossing the libel line everyone no,s murphy was arrested even ITV went there balding has been putting him up since, that's all KIA said without naming them,balding/murphy aren't taking anyone to court for saying wha
KAI,s main point was that in 10/20 yrs time and murphy is on skid row likes of balding, TC ,Chappers etc will be 1st on lucky to say how sad it all is and this is what we THEV ROYAL WE should have done blah,blah, AKA GAZZA etc
KAI,s main point was that in 10/20 yrs time and murphy is on skid row likes of balding, TC ,Chappers etc will be 1st on lucky to say how sad it all is and this is what we THEV ROYAL WE should have done blah,blah, AKA GAZZA etc
They opt into it but for most of them, a life on the jockey treadmill is a grim experience. No elective holidays, no eating, little drinking, constantly travelling. Lots of failure. Not surprising that some of them look for coping mechanisms. The authorities can provide resources to mitigate the risk, doubt it will be eradicated. Many of them stating that removing saunas from the course has made it even tougher.
They opt into it but for most of them, a life on the jockey treadmill is a grim experience. No elective holidays, no eating, little drinking, constantly travelling. Lots of failure. Not surprising that some of them look for coping mechanisms. The aut
The BHA certainly don't take jockey welfare as seriously as they should but jockeys are mostly grown men and women aged 20 or more so should a "nanny state" have to be supervising them even when they are not working? Should trainers also be banned from having a drink on days when they have a runner? I have never accepted this tale about no holidays. Quite apart from suspension or injury, any established jockey could give notice to his agent and to his regular trainers that he is taking a week off at a quiet stage of the season to recharge the batteries. Bit different with conditionals and apprentices who have to ride when the trainer tells them. Jockeys are often their own worst enemies. It was obvious to many that Harry Cobden was not fully fit after a serious fall mid season but he kept riding and only now admits that he should have taken a longer break.
The BHA certainly don't take jockey welfare as seriously as they should but jockeys are mostly grown men and women aged 20 or more so should a "nanny state" have to be supervising them even when they are not working? Should trainers also be banned fr
Totally agree with you Sageform. This fuss about the jocks is typical of what the country has become. Nobody wanting to take responsibility for themselves.
Yes, some weighing rooms are poor but so are many factories, warehouses etc. And, yes, jock do not HAVE to every day but seem to think they are being forced to.
The other thing in a similar vein is stable staff whining about Sunday evening meetings. Many of them are young and would get double bubble for doing a Sunday, yet the bleeding hearts brigade think it is terrible they have to go racing on a Sunday.
When I was young, I wanted more and more overtime but today ambition and self progress is a thing of the past.
Too many want too much but think that wanting is enough when working is still the best way of fulfilling desires.
Totally agree with you Sageform. This fuss about the jocks is typical of what the country has become. Nobody wanting to take responsibility for themselves. Yes, some weighing rooms are poor but so are many factories, warehouses etc. And, yes, jock do
And too many going to University these days, to get a degree in some arty wishy washy subject, to come out with a large debt... And then get a job they could have started 3 years earlier... We need more apprenticeships in proper jobs like the building industry, imo
And too many going to University these days, to get a degree in some arty wishy washy subject, to come out with a large debt... And then get a job they could have started 3 years earlier...We need more apprenticeships in proper jobs like the building
It's cultural sageform. They are self employed, the CAN technically take holidays. The implication, the reality, is that almost inevitably they can't. Only the galacticos can pick and choose when and when not to work. But they've all been on the treadmill at some point, aside from the sons of AOB. But even they could not get away with wasting.
We can hold both thoughts at the same time, it's literally a choice, but that choice in most cases leads to a pretty grim day to day existence.
And yes, I'm all about personal responsibility, but I'm not completely devoid of empathy.
It's cultural sageform. They are self employed, the CAN technically take holidays. The implication, the reality, is that almost inevitably they can't. Only the galacticos can pick and choose when and when not to work. But they've all been on the trea
In that case they should have to select 2 weeks a year in which they are not taking rides. It is not reasonable to "expect" them to ride 7 days a week for the whole season. It is worse in GB because of the number of courses and the travelling required. Some trainers seem to rotate rides with Andrew Balding for example giving most rides in the North and Scotland to PJ McDonald although Probert rode Hi Ya Mal at Hamilton. He seems to be retained by the owner.
In that case they should have to select 2 weeks a year in which they are not taking rides. It is not reasonable to "expect" them to ride 7 days a week for the whole season. It is worse in GB because of the number of courses and the travelling require
A compelled holiday would be a logical thing to do. Still can ride out, ride abroad etc, but would be a start.
They could achieve it by having restricted races.
Jumps isn't quite the same as there's usually weather intervention at some point, and natural breaks. Less pressure on the scales. But of course, the temptation to ride injured.
A compelled holiday would be a logical thing to do. Still can ride out, ride abroad etc, but would be a start. They could achieve it by having restricted races.Jumps isn't quite the same as there's usually weather intervention at some point, and natu
if you are a struggling jokey and have 1 ride at 2.00 leafy and another 1 at 8pm kempton you will have to turn one down and possibly never get on another from the trainer
if you are a struggling jokey and have 1 ride at 2.00 leafy and another 1 at 8pm kempton you will have to turn one down and possibly never get on another from the trainer