would ryan have won on the second?

yes because it would have been fav and kingscote would have been on the winner told not to stop AOB,s fav winning

And they wonder why the sports going down the toilet.

Kingscote wasted energy trying to compete out wide for the early lead whilst Moore would have settled him early.

The second would definitely have won given a more intelligent ride.

May 10, 2025 -- 3:14PM, loper wrote:

Kingscote wasted energy trying to compete out wide for the early lead whilst Moore would have settled him early.The second would definitely have won given a more intelligent ride.

Agreed covered more ground, goes down by a head! Nice Aussie whip action by Moore to stop it going by too and Weaver says Ryan weren’t doing much!

Add to that Moore bummed it for all he was worth!

weaver is a moron what the fook has Moore's ride got to do with what the 2nd does, he,s allowed 7 do you use none because the other rider uses none, weaver making a fool of himself, does he honestly believe if a kingcote was on another trainers horses in same situation he wouldn't have been more urgent give it a few more

The gravy train runs thick with most of them.

wouldn't it be refreshing for a tv pundit to tell the truth rather than find excuses...maybe they're scared of losing their jobs, as was Kingscote!  I feel sorry for the punters on the second.

The way Stay True came out of the stalls was like it was a pacemaker on only it’s second start! How’s the owner rate that? Still he’ll win another day. Named for the Derby but not entered! Like Continuous running in the Dante but not entered for Epsom.