There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 147 comments are related to the topic:
Shoemark
Shoemark
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 147
|
By:
Horse thrown because jock couldn't keep it straight. If you saw the head on no surprise at all it was thrown out. Punctured the balloon for a few.
|
|
By:
Wondersobright, that's irrelevant as it didn't affect the result. The point is the 2nd past the post was beat by a very tiny margin yet suffered significant interference. Has to be reversed. Soumillon maybe gets a small ban for the interference caused late but that interference obviously had no bearing on the result.
|
|
By:
backed Zarigana and it would have won only for soft arse dropping his whip but dont think it would have been turned around in England.
Thats the second time i have had that race on a stewards the first one was a Khaled Abdulla horse that also won the English 1000 on a disqualification. |
|
By:
If it had kept straight, wouldn't have won anyway
|
|
By:
asparagus • May 11, 2025 4:37 PM BST
Wondersobright, that's irrelevant as it didn't affect the result. its cost the 4th filly 3rd place so you're wrong |
|
By:
Will Betfair pay out on Zaringa?
|
|
By:
if that's only interference in the race that aga filly should be coming off the board
|
|
By:
as clear a result stands as you will see
except nepotism has reared its head (again) |
|
By:
Will Betfair pay out on Zaringa?
of course |
|
By:
Agreed.
|
|
By:
Soumillon maybe gets a small ban for the interference caused late
? |
|
By:
They closed the book straight after the race. The result shows She's Perfect as the winner.
|
|
By:
Wondersobright, a horse is only disqualified in such circumstances if it improves its own position. She's Perfect caused interference which improved her position. Zarigana caused interference which didn't improve her position. Therefore She's Perfect is disqualified and Zarigana isn't. Very straightforward.
|
|
By:
and they'll reverse it
|
|
By:
will be manually resettled
|
|
By:
Disgusting! French cheats! Watched it back 6/7 times, absolutely nothing in that!
|
|
By:
Field of gold run the last furlong faster than any guineas winner in the last 15 years, career defining mistake, inexcusable at group one level
|
|
By:
Seem to remember them not throwing Dylan Thomas out in the Arc. I wonder why. The common owners of Jacqueline Quest and the filly today have been shafted imo.
|
|
By:
My thoughts exactly RoadRunner.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
How is it interference? Did they stop riding because of the "interference" No!
|
|
By:
there wasn't any interference wp
|
|
By:
exactly wonder. Frightened to death that coolmore would f!ck them off in the future
|
|
By:
She's Perfect caused interference which improved her position.
we differ there |
|
By:
Nothing in it at all.
|
|
By:
DT was under the old rules, when a horse was thrown out for causing interference if it improved the finishing position or not. Was a scandal.
|
|
By:
Anyone backed Shes Perfect and extracted their balance? My bet on Zarigana still showing as a loser so presumably they have credited the bets on the first past the post. I can see your post Cider but Betfair were premature to settle any bets.
|
|
By:
agree to disagree
special duty a long time ago now but 2 classics in the stewards room wonder if aga filly can match that |
|
By:
Think it was the obvious and correct decision. But also agree, reverse the horses and probably stands
|
|
By:
If people backed SP, and withdraw their balance, they'll end up with a negative balance. I seem to recall bf now have the authority to reverse the withdrawal.
|
|
By:
It stands all day Angela!
|
|
By:
And it risks being booted off the platform.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
When will betfair nick the money back after already paying out ?
|
|
By:
can take up to an hr, had one in the usa that took 6
|
|
By:
Special Duty had 2 furlongs to get past JQ and couldn't manage it. Another appalling decision imo. But lets give it to the Abdullahs and Aga Khans of this world as we know who wields the power in our sport.
|
|
By:
Harsh to me that decision.
Looking forward to the Coronation Stks,surely they must meet in that again. |
|
By:
Harsh but fair
|
|
By:
Significant interference and a tiny margin. The terrible Dylan Thomas decision has no bearing on this one which was very clear cut.
|
|
By:
|
