My latest 'Zoom-In' where pro-punter Mark Holder talks about ditching in-depth from study, getting insulted by Matt Chapman, no longer tipping to clients and concentrating on in-running betting from home.
Ask him if he backed Ikdam in the '89 Triumph Hurdle. His dad trained it, I was all over it like a rash!!
Won @66-1, after-timing is allowed after 36 years has passed.
Ask him if he backed Ikdam in the '89 Triumph Hurdle. His dad trained it, I was all over it like a rash!!Won @66-1, after-timing is allowed after 36 years has passed.
Big fan of his previous interviews and some gems of thinking but here he talks about in-running ( from 26 mis in ) and would be amazed if most players of any ability on here don't think this is absolute kindergarten stuff he comes out with here.
Big fan of his previous interviews and some gems of thinking but here he talks about in-running ( from 26 mis in ) and would be amazed if most players of any ability on here don't think this is absolute kindergarten stuff he comes out with here.
well it's 26 mins 'til the end. But it's really just about horses using too much petrol early mid race moves etc. At one point he does admit he hasn't paid enough attention to horses getting a good trip in a race or a bad one. That's really because his angle has not involved IR for 30 years. Now he comes on and tells people what it's all about !!
well it's 26 mins 'til the end. But it's really just about horses using too much petrol early mid race moves etc. At one point he does admit he hasn't paid enough attention to horses getting a good trip in a race or a bad one. That's really because h
don't think he fully explained what he means. Of course other things can trump whatever weight a horse is carrying or even in some cases ability. I take it that's what he really meant but as I say he didn't go into depth about it. Thought the whole interview was poor but some may disagree. Watch it if you can !
don't think he fully explained what he means. Of course other things can trump whatever weight a horse is carrying or even in some cases ability. I take it that's what he really meant but as I say he didn't go into depth about it. Thought the whole i
duncan idaho • January 31, 2025 11:48 AM GMT stopped listening to him when he said hcp marks are practically irrelevant
tho spose it goes to show there's plenty of ways to skin a cat
duncan cheers for that, it saves me wasting an hour of my life.
duncan idaho • January 31, 2025 11:48 AM GMTstopped listening to him when he said hcp marks are practically irrelevanttho spose it goes to show there's plenty of ways to skin a catduncan cheers for that, it saves me wasting an hour of my life.
you will be glued to your seat when Simon interviews the Tynesider who has made well into seven figures betting in-running at exchange shops track boxes and now drones !!
you will be glued to your seat when Simon interviews the Tynesider who has made well into seven figures betting in-running at exchange shops track boxes and now drones !!
Mark said 150 won't always beat the 143 horse in a non-handicap. This is true. Strange point to make though from a man that made his money from handicap hurdles ?
Mark said 150 won't always beat the 143 horse in a non-handicap. This is true. Strange point to make though from a man that made his money from handicap hurdles ?
Mark said 150 won't always beat the 143 horse in a non-handicap--------------------------------------------------------------------what's his next nugget of information ?Sunday follows Saturday ?
If after watching interviews with pro's you have picked up one profoundly interesting point it has been well worthwhile watching. For me this has certainly been the case with Mark in most previous interviews. But yes not here. It's a good example of someone thinking they are excellent and being excellent in one field and then possibly thinking they are at somewhere like the same level elsewhere. Pre-race and IR different ball games even though it's still horse racing. And then you have to get through 26 minutes first !!
If after watching interviews with pro's you have picked up one profoundly interesting point it has been well worthwhile watching. For me this has certainly been the case with Mark in most previous interviews. But yes not here. It's a good example of
swiftynifty 31 Jan 25 13:30duncan idaho • January 31, 2025 11:48 AM GMTstopped listening to him when he said hcp marks are practically irrelevanttho spose it goes to show there's plenty of ways to skin a catJust to be clear, i wasn't referring to
"How often do we hear that a particular horse is close to its "previous winning mark" or "well in today"? It comes at us from all angles. Trainers, punters, jockeys, TV presenters and pundits talk about them as if they mean something. Which, of course, they don't".
Don't agree with him there UNLESS the horse is overbet because of it. But he hasn't said that ( rest of piece behind paywall ). Many gambles are landed because a horse is at a mark it has previously won on. If you are on at the bigger prices you often have the value. You likely need the info though.
"How often do we hear that a particular horse is close to its "previous winning mark" or "well in today"? It comes at us from all angles. Trainers, punters, jockeys, TV presenters and pundits talk about them as if they mean something. Which, of cours
Understand totally when he says he doesnt want to be stuck in an office studying four hard 0-100 handicap hurdles for six hours a day in his late 50s.
He is doing the right thing in his late 50s
Understand totally when he says he doesnt want to be stuck in an office studying four hard 0-100 handicap hurdles for six hours a day in his late 50s. He is doing the right thing in his late 50s
Certainly don't disagree FOR HIM Celtic. But when people stop doing what they were good at I would think their appeal as somebody to listen to diminishes quite a bit.
Certainly don't disagree FOR HIM Celtic. But when people stop doing what they were good at I would think their appeal as somebody to listen to diminishes quite a bit.