BHA Complaints contact number

i wouldn't waste your time tbh Celtic Warrior...

it will go in one ear and out the other...

they're not interested.

Jesus h

https://forms.theiline.co.uk/bha

online form with a heading 'Inside Information'

Cheers. If no one complains then this ****@@ just keeps carrying on

Maybe if you shared the complaint you might get more people contacting them?

The last race at uttoxeter on saturday

They will 'note' the complaint and send it to be drug tested.

A report has already been sent to the BHA from the stewards but tbh I don't see what the fuss is about, a load of tenners and £20s ew then joe punter latching on in a week race, hardly an orchestrated gamble imvho?

I am always amazed that most punters either love or turn a blind eye to these gambles coming off even though such gambles cost the punter himself in the long term

Celtic warrior...

more chance Hibs winning next year's SPL title than the BHA taking ANY notice of your complaint.

don't waste your time...

they don't care.

Jan 26, 2025 -- 7:22PM, Celtic warrior wrote:

I am always amazed that most punters either love or turn a blind eye to these gambles coming off even though such gambles cost the punter himself in the long term

To be fair you see nothing wrong with what Prescott does as 'everyone knows'. How does that make it right?

If there was an issue, there would have been at least one bookie being vocal Celtic, there are none so far? Weak race, weak market rather than an organised and orchestrated gamble.

Because it is common knowledge what he does and opaque unlike saturdays chirade

when f/c 50/1 pokes return 3.44 its blatant...cannot even be disputed
but what can you or they do about it?

surely if you owned a horse and it was 66,s you,d have a tenner ew ,if not why own the horse, but in the other 500 66 shotsw a week the price doesn't collapse ,which tells me this 20 ew is a load of **** from connections

except bet the 3.44

80/1 pokes dont end up as 85/40 jollies very often to be fair.
Celtic is angry so why not let him get it off his chest by way of a complaint.
The carthatic effect of writing one is worth something alone, even if ultimately the powers that be do bugger all.

Just looked back at a horse I helped saddle 21 years ago, was 100/1 on here and books were 66/1. A lot of us had some of both to stakes varying from a tenner ew to £100 at prices down to about 33s, after that nobody we knew punted him. He was backed just among the same guys who would always have a punt on him, no gamble and nobody really knew if he would handle heavy ground.

He ended up 20/1 SP in a 19 runner handicap and finished 3rd, the point is it does not take a fortune to force a price to shrink if small punters latch on.

66/1 to 20/1 is a 3% price change
uttox saturday was over 30% price change

A strong market 19 runner handicap compared with a weak hurdle race is not a particularly good comparison tbf stewarts, but the significance of the money for ours to force it down proves it does not take a fortune, on Course he opened 33/1 and touched 100/1 in a place. Nobody mentioned going in again on course so the only explanation is smallish money, perhaps from some who knew we had backed him.

Apologies wonders, meant the reply to you. Thinking about TOFTL, are you up for the team compy?

3% does not take a fortune I agree but 30% does

yes if there's a comp will do

if your suggesting lots of over horses in a 19 runner handicap are attracting lots of 10,20 ews probably right why wernt all their odds collapsing

CagliariG 26 Jan 25 19:35 
If there was an issue, there would have been at least one bookie being vocal Celtic, there are none so far? Weak race, weak market rather than an organised and orchestrated gamble.

80/1 > 2/1 ya silleeekhhuunt.

You would not have a clue shafter so your opinion is of no consequence!! HTH

Barstewards Youtube podcast tile

"Sunday Sermon - Evan Would Beat the Polygraph"

You would be as well complaining to a tree tbh….