Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 89
By:
windsor knot
When: 26 Jan 25 22:44
better keep an eye on their klic boum ....already been a stewards look at that one .
By:
hulk23
When: 26 Jan 25 23:47
Ghasham was put in 11/4 fav morning prices

went off 14/1

BSP 25.62 Shocked
By:
sparrow
When: 27 Jan 25 09:00
Agree with Shropshire Lad with it costing owners so much money keeping horses in training which of course keep people in employment.
By:
formoftheace
When: 27 Jan 25 10:23
A dirty sport tbf…..loaded with undesirable….wouldn’t show most a birds nest or trust with the bothy cat…..

Welcome to hell.
By:
DIE LINKE
When: 27 Jan 25 10:27
The way to deal with scandals small or large is a brazen/indignant response, hence the owner having £20 EW and the game being knackered if that's a gamble. Politicians have built entire careers using this tactic.
By:
formoftheace
When: 27 Jan 25 10:38
They look upon the paying customers as fodder,always have since day one,nothing will change tbh….imo…

Fodder !

The gravy train also treat the fodder with contempt,they cringe when the fodder complain about certain rides and betting….they want the new fodder to believe it’s all white and rosy…..
By:
aberdonia
When: 27 Jan 25 10:51
This has gone on for as long as there has been racing.....Some right moaners on here.....We would have to ban every trainer bar the one's whose patronage means they dont need to gamble to make up for the shocking prize money here.

It wont register with the wider public at large either....Racing as a betting medium is dying not because of this, but because youngsters prefer to bet on fitba....
By:
sparrow
When: 27 Jan 25 10:54
aberdonia Joined: 18 Oct 08
Replies: 1348027 Jan 25 10:51
It wont register with the wider public at large either....Racing as a betting medium is dying not because of this, but because youngsters prefer to bet on fitba....




And why do you suppose this is?   Could it possibly be that the youngsters don't trust what they see with Racing?
By:
formoftheace
When: 27 Jan 25 11:13
Ask any neutral what they think of betting on horse racing…..99.99 % will hit you with the same answer…..
By:
1st time poster
When: 27 Jan 25 12:41
as stated before its the same mentality as those without a pot to pish in defending the rich over tax avoidance.evasion ,because one they think they,ll be the rich tax avoiders,in racing one day they think they,ll be in the no about a 66,s plot horse
By:
1st time poster
When: 27 Jan 25 12:41
as stated before its the same mentality as those without a pot to pish in defending the rich over tax avoidance.evasion ,because one they think they,ll be the rich tax avoiders,in racing one day they think they,ll be in the no about a 66,s plot horse
By:
1st time poster
When: 27 Jan 25 12:41
the farage/musk/trump effect
By:
stu
When: 27 Jan 25 13:03
I don't think most neutrals avoid betting horses because it is corrupt - most neutrals just see a lot of pretty horses running fast and trying to win, with lovely jockeys trying hard also.

They are the once a year punters on a works do picking 20-1 shots and screaming it home at the races.

It's those of us who bet on it regularly that see all the filth and corruption.
By:
stu
When: 27 Jan 25 13:04
...and yet we're the ones who keep betting on it... Plain
By:
aberdonia
When: 27 Jan 25 14:25
neutrals avoid betting on horse racing because they find it dull as dishwater coupled with the fact they have no idea what is going on....Football, nearly everyone understands and enjoys.

Get out of the bubble.....Horse Racing has been in decline for decades, such is life..
By:
aberdonia
When: 27 Jan 25 14:27
As for "corruption", i enjoy a dodgy coup......
By:
howard
When: 27 Jan 25 14:36
for once agree with aberdonia.   good or modest  form no money for it please yourself.   no form plus shedloads of money lump on.
By:
N-east Correspondent
When: 27 Jan 25 15:18
Plenty of these 80s into single digits go astray, as long as i have been racing - coups like these have been going on, Ryan Price was a master though his big gambles bit before my time.
By:
1st time poster
When: 27 Jan 25 15:21
PLENTY ?
how many 80,s shots go in to single digits a season, 1, 2
By:
howard
When: 27 Jan 25 15:23
that's true but there is a difference between 5 or 6/1  and 85/40f.
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 27 Jan 25 15:23
i cant ever recall seeing a horse go 66's > 9/4 ish.
By:
1st time poster
When: 27 Jan 25 15:26
STRANGE , NORTH EAST has seen that many,  plenty of them have been beaten as well as the winners
By:
howard
When: 27 Jan 25 15:27
yeah very rare .
By:
LesterLad
When: 27 Jan 25 15:52
Be interesting to see how Wild Nephin gets on, first race at Chepstow tomorrow. This ran in the same race was second favourite and unfortunately pulled up after 3 hurdles. Twisted shoe, but money has come for it !
By:
brandyontherocks
When: 27 Jan 25 16:16
How many people moaning would think differently if they had been given the nod when the horse was 66/1 ??
By:
1st time poster
When: 27 Jan 25 16:57
don't suppose many were watching ATR at uttox ,but in YIFTERS piece in sportinlife today,he says ANDREW THORNTON interviewed  Williams before racing about the gamble and Williams didn't want to talk about it but eventually said he wouldn't trust the eventual  winner and fancied his other runner in the race, AND REMEMBER IN FUTURE SAVILLE THINKS WILLIAMS SHOULD GET PAID FOR THAT LITTLE  NUGGET
By:
sparrow
When: 27 Jan 25 17:00
brandyontherocks 27 Jan 25 16:16 
How many people moaning would think differently if they had been given the nod when the horse was 66/1 ??





You call it moaning and perhaps some of the moaners simply want to see Racing survive whereas others completely ignore the fact that the younger generations want nothing to do with it because of what is going on.
By:
CagliariG
When: 27 Jan 25 17:13
Racing has survived plenty of orchestrated coups Sparrow, this was hardly a Curleyesque type plot, more a large handful of owners, friends and associates having a punt at big prices then Joe punter joining in. Doesn't take a fortune for liabilities to mount before the books react and more lose than win but of course nobody ever cares about that, do they?

You seem to be suggesting the game is not as straight as in your time, before patrol cameras and live TV pictures, delusion imvho.
By:
sparrow
When: 27 Jan 25 17:33
I am not suggesting that at all but we live in different times now whereby we have far greater access to tv pictures etc. and what was tolerable at one time is no longer. The game in my early days was riddled with doping and to compare with that is of course ridiculous. Deal with the present is what is required and forget about the so called wonderful past which I would never want to return to.
By:
1st time poster
When: 27 Jan 25 17:35
why would the owners  back a horse when the trainer is on live tv telling the world he wouldn't trust it/back it and fancied his other horse in the race ?
if the owners always back it why hasn't it plunged from 66,S to single digits before or at least showed signs of been well punted,if it only takes a few bets ?
By:
CagliariG
When: 27 Jan 25 17:44
So he fancied a 50/1 shot you say 1st TP, with only one owner btw. Are you suggesting syndicate owned horses only get punted if the trainer gives the nod? The horse I explained about yesterday would be a typical example, the trainer did not fancy him, nobody knew if he could handle heavy and was against 18 other runners with form in the book, I even had to borrow a bigger girth strap as the trainer had not even checked the tack.

Have you seen a single bookmaker complaining? Probably because they know it was no plot and the vast majority of the time such punts end up in their satchels!!
By:
1st time poster
When: 27 Jan 25 17:54
no but if every horse that had 20 ew punted on it by the conections went to single digits there be a dozen everyday,there isn't .as pointed out your lucky if there's 2 or 3 a season,which means it was far more than a few 20 ew bets
By:
CagliariG
When: 27 Jan 25 17:58
You should learn to read 1st TP.
By:
1st time poster
When: 27 Jan 25 18:02
if Williams fancied his other horse and he or the connections had 20 ew on it,why not ,in Williams world why didn't that go from 50,s to single figures ?
By:
CagliariG
When: 27 Jan 25 18:08
No idea 1st TP, you are the one who stated he fancied it? Maybe the lady owner does not bet.
By:
Celtic warrior
When: 27 Jan 25 22:48
Glad to see i am not the only angry person here. This episode stinks to high heaven and  is another nail in racings coffin.

Gambling on horses has to be seen as fair or its just flappin greyhounds!
By:
stu
When: 27 Jan 25 23:45
Gambling on horses has to be seen as fair

Noble intentions celtic, but good luck with that one Grin
By:
hulk23
When: 27 Jan 25 23:52
Never near to challenge
Never better than midfield
In rear throughout
Raced in last, weakened before 2 out
Always behind, tailed off
Always behind

Hacks up, wins 8 length clearing off into the distance ... 80's to 2's.

surely one of the most blatant ever ?

same jockey every time, nobody else getting on it Wink
By:
1st time poster
When: 28 Jan 25 11:43
so the potter horse well backed on Saturday before apparently pulling up injured early on,now fit 3 days later and fav for the 1st at chepstow LaughLaugh,lets hope Potter has phoned around and no ones having it right off without informing him
By:
hulk23
When: 28 Jan 25 11:46
potters was pulled up early, 2nd and 3rd favs were both tailed off.
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com