Professionals in the sport say tough, you shouldn't go there. But the stewards are not professionals.
Perhaps the question could be, if he pulled off the rails and challenged on the outside would he have got up. I would say he wouldn't.
Professionals in the sport say tough, you shouldn't go there. But the stewards are not professionals.Perhaps the question could be, if he pulled off the rails and challenged on the outside would he have got up. I would say he wouldn't.
Coming to the last you could see Cobden was not thinking his horse would not be involved in the finish. Cobden cold not care less or he would have objected!
Coming to the last you could see Cobden was not thinking his horse would not be involved in the finish. Cobden cold not care less or he would have objected!
Race 4 - 3:30pm THE MID-WARWICKSHIRE CLEANING SUPPLIES LTD MAIDEN HURDLE RACE (CLASS 4) (GBB RACE)
Permission was given for FIRST CUT to wear a red hood to the start.
An enquiry was held to consider interference inside the final ½ a furlong involving the winner, GLYNN BRAE (IRE), ridden by Sam Twiston-Davies and LUD’OR (FR), placed second, ridden by Harry Cobden. Twiston-Davies was for suspended for 7 for careless riding as he allowed his mount to drift left-handed when insufficiently clear of GLYNN BRAE (IRE), causing Cobden to take a significant check and his mount to clip heels and stumbled.
Following the race, James Best reported that HELPFUL, which was pulled up, ran too free. Sean Bowen reported that TRUST HOUSE (IRE), unplaced, hung right-handed.
yet not announced?
Race 4 - 3:30pmTHE MID-WARWICKSHIRE CLEANING SUPPLIES LTD MAIDEN HURDLE RACE (CLASS 4) (GBB RACE)Permission was given for FIRST CUT to wear a red hood to the start.An enquiry was held to consider interference inside the final ½ a furlong involving t
That report suggests that they didn't hold an enquiry into whether the placings had been affected (no mention of that in the report), but into whether STD had ridden without due care and attention. Hence no need to announce it to the punters.
I'm not saying they were right not to consider the effect on the placings; just pointing out why they might not have announced the enquiry.
That report suggests that they didn't hold an enquiry into whether the placings had been affected (no mention of that in the report), but into whether STD had ridden without due care and attention. Hence no need to announce it to the punters.I'm not