Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Rico-Dangleflaps
19 Oct 24 15:37
Joined:
Date Joined: 07 Sep 18
| Topic/replies: 52,958 | Blogger: Rico-Dangleflaps's blog
cut 2nd up on rail..

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 27
By:
stewarts rise
When: 19 Oct 24 15:38
Cobden nearly caused his horse to be brought down imo.
By:
duffy
When: 19 Oct 24 15:38
Wasn't a big enough gap IMO...and I backed the 2nd.
By:
asparagus
When: 19 Oct 24 15:38
Has to stand. No way of being confident the 2nd would have won without the interference. Small ban for Twister
By:
Bluebird2sing
When: 19 Oct 24 15:38
Won't change but Ludor abs murdered
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Oct 24 15:39
2nd may well have won but the 2L will save it no doubt..
By:
shoodacoodadidnt
When: 19 Oct 24 15:39
not even a stewards - mental
By:
Bluebird2sing
When: 19 Oct 24 15:40
Was a huge gap which shut off as Cobden went through. He was entitled to go for that run. Ruddy unlucky despite some comments here.
By:
duffy
When: 19 Oct 24 15:40
no gap
By:
Bluebird2sing
When: 19 Oct 24 15:41
No stewards as they were having their pimms - ****s
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Oct 24 15:41
duffy 19 Oct 24 15:40 
no gap

Laugh
By:
Regbutler
When: 19 Oct 24 15:41
Side on looked like no gap
Haven't seen head on
By:
loper
When: 19 Oct 24 15:42
Professionals in the sport say tough, you shouldn't go there. But the stewards are not professionals.

Perhaps the question could be, if he pulled off the rails and challenged on the outside would he have got up. I would say he wouldn't.
By:
Bluebird2sing
When: 19 Oct 24 15:42
Duffy you're blind seen the replay head-on? Could have got a bus through there.
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Oct 24 15:45
that is simply incredible that no stewards wasnt called...its qas 1.0001 to be called.
By:
Bluebird2sing
When: 19 Oct 24 15:47
Agree Rico. Was it even discussed or did they just fail to see the head-on?
By:
jinxy
When: 19 Oct 24 15:48
cobden riding like a prck , no need to go up the rail.
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Oct 24 15:48
never showed hd on on rtv..did on blv..winner went 2yds left and nearly caused 2nd to fall..

ive no words tbh.
By:
MJK
When: 19 Oct 24 15:49
Misleading thread title
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Oct 24 15:49
fo jinxy ysc..was plenty room wen he went for a run.
By:
Bluebird2sing
When: 19 Oct 24 15:51
Armchair Jinxy - stupid comment
By:
jinxy
When: 19 Oct 24 15:51
Well if the gap does not close he wins going away it`s that simple.
By:
jinxy
When: 19 Oct 24 15:53
Coming to the last you could see Cobden was not thinking his horse would not be involved in the finish. Cobden cold not care less or he would have objected!
By:
jinxy
When: 19 Oct 24 15:55
Sorry , put that wrong , Cobden was not expecting to be involved in the finish !
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Oct 24 16:09
won 2L would av been futile..odds on winning jock gets a ban.
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Oct 24 16:10
Race 4 - 3:30pm
THE MID-WARWICKSHIRE CLEANING SUPPLIES LTD MAIDEN HURDLE RACE (CLASS 4) (GBB RACE)

Permission was given for FIRST CUT to wear a red hood to the start.

An enquiry was held to consider interference inside the final ½ a furlong involving the winner, GLYNN BRAE (IRE), ridden by Sam Twiston-Davies and LUD’OR (FR), placed second, ridden by Harry Cobden. Twiston-Davies was for suspended for 7 for careless riding as he allowed his mount to drift left-handed when insufficiently clear of GLYNN BRAE (IRE), causing Cobden to take a significant check and his mount to clip heels and stumbled.

Following the race, James Best reported that HELPFUL, which was pulled up, ran too free. Sean Bowen reported that TRUST HOUSE (IRE), unplaced, hung right-handed.

yet not announced?
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 19 Oct 24 16:17
Following the race, Jinxy reported that there was no gap,and that Cobdens a clown .
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 19 Oct 24 16:26
That report suggests that they didn't hold an enquiry into whether the placings had been affected (no mention of that in the report), but into whether STD had ridden without due care and attention. Hence no need to announce it to the punters.

I'm not saying they were right not to consider the effect on the placings; just pointing out why they might not have announced the enquiry.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com