Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 162 comments are related to the topic:
Calum Shepherd you silly billy...

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 4 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 162
By:
swiftynifty
When: 22 Aug 24 17:27
I've zoomed in closer, to the stratum corneum of both horses, no gap, dead heat.
By:
.Marksman.
When: 22 Aug 24 17:28
With Rico's pic, I rest my case.  Cagliari, you are thick!
By:
CagliariG
When: 22 Aug 24 17:34
I must be marksman, like anyone with both eyes working!!
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 22 Aug 24 17:38
CagliariG 27 May 24 19:27
We have laid it to lose £155 K min sparrow and hope for more!!!

wat waz the final lay total?
By:
CagliariG
When: 22 Aug 24 17:39
£11K profit over 2 races shafter, get over it!! ROFL
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 22 Aug 24 17:41
ROFL
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 22 Aug 24 17:42
83yr old chelsea pensioner with aspergers sitting tying absolute and utter tripe on a daily basis.
By:
CagliariG
When: 22 Aug 24 17:42
Any chance of a photo of your computer screen of the lifetime Portal?
By:
CagliariG
When: 22 Aug 24 17:56
TBF we all know you never served shafter, apart from that an accurate pen picture!!
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 22 Aug 24 17:56
ive had 2 acc's 2004-2009  2010-present
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 22 Aug 24 17:58


any good?
By:
CagliariG
When: 22 Aug 24 17:59
We believe you, like we believe Quixall tbf... imv... who also cannot post a photo of a bet or lifetime Portal!!!
By:
CagliariG
When: 22 Aug 24 18:01
Nice Bog Darking et al!!! Do you tell your carer you lived a blameless life?
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 22 Aug 24 18:07
CagliariG 22 Aug 24 17:42 
Any chance of a photo of your computer screen of the lifetime Portal?





any good?
By:
CagliariG
When: 22 Aug 24 18:09
Never claimed one unlike you but destroy you for proofs every time!!!
By:
CagliariG
When: 22 Aug 24 18:11
BTW with the computer screen and content visible YSDC!!!
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 22 Aug 24 18:14
CagliariG 22 Aug 24 17:42
Any chance of a photo of your computer screen of the lifetime Portal?
By:
CagliariG
When: 22 Aug 24 18:15
Thicker than I thought, lost the ability to read!!
By:
barstool
When: 22 Aug 24 18:34
Did well to get that home at Chelmsford just then.
By:
swiftynifty
When: 22 Aug 24 19:10
He thought he was riding a 'he', brain scrambled, as for last night the horse dead-heated and he stopped riding, take it on the chin and move on whilst telling the Gredley's to eff off once and for all. And don't be egged on by that clown Chapman. Have a holiday and hopefully have a good autumn, nice guy and very decent rider.
By:
roggrain
When: 23 Aug 24 09:57
2024 and we're using photo finish tech. that isn't fit for purpose.
By:
differentdrum
When: 23 Aug 24 10:27
To mess up as he did was bad enough, but then to try and pretend he didn't stop riding beggars belief. Is there something wrong with these jocks that they seem to think they can take everyone for idiots.
By:
HappyHibby
When: 23 Aug 24 10:33
probably coz they know the BHA is as weak as very weak pi$$ and there's a fair chance they will not be banned...

this is the problem when you have folk who are supposed to enforce the laws of the game but bottle it on an almost daily basis...

probably coz if they had everyone in they should have in there would be very few left imv.
By:
wondersobright
When: 23 Aug 24 11:40
stops pushing when passing the trees...2 strides from the line when a head up
its a ban IF its a DH end of story
can't see the opposite mirror on the replay makes it difficult to line them up but its either a DH or he's won 1 pixel in which case that would save him
By:
wondersobright
When: 23 Aug 24 11:42
its the same special sort of arrogance that doyle displayed the other night
"I didn't stop riding"
if it was up to me that's a licence suspension
By:
sparrow
When: 23 Aug 24 11:44
He nearly got disqualified in the last race yesterday as well. Two days on the trot he has put me through it!
By:
sparrow
When: 23 Aug 24 11:45
Pos. (Draw)   
Horse / SP
Trainer / Jockey
Age    WGT    OR    TS    RPR    MR   
1 (3)

Runner Jacket
2. Smooth Silesie  (IRE) 7/2
Callum Shepherd
Lisa Williamson
3    97 b    62    46    –    –   
Prominent, headway over 1f out, hung right and bumped rival inside final furlong, kept on towards finish (op 4/1)
By:
sparrow
When: 23 Aug 24 11:46
An enquiry was held to consider the placings in this race after interference approximately 1 furlong out when the winner, SMOOTH SILESIE (IRE) ridden by Callum Shepherd, interfered with KENTO, placed second, ridden by Rob Hornby. The Stewards considered that the interference was accidental in that SMOOTH SILESIE (IRE) had shifted quickly right-handed giving a bump to KENTO but had not improved SMOOTH SILESIE (IRE)’s placing as it appeared to be holding KENTO all the way to the line to win by ¾ length. The stewards could not be satisfied that the interference cost KENTO the winning distance.
By:
scoobytoo
When: 23 Aug 24 21:26
A bit of sanity from Dave Jennings RP



This nonsense needs to stop. Now. In less than three weeks we have had three jockeys who should have won races, but didn't. Well, the final part of the terrible trilogy was a dead-heat. One of the riders got a 28-day ban, another got 18 days and the other somehow got off scot-free.

The easing-down spree started at Bath on the first Friday of the month when Alec Voikhansky surged to the front on Power Of Twins, kicked a couple of lengths clear before deciding to sit motionless for five strides without ever looking left or right. He had his heart broken by Lovestruck Romeo. He got 28 days and deserved every one of them.

Next up was James Doyle. A terrific chap by all accounts and a superb ambassador for the sport. It turns out he has even more charm and charisma than I ever imagined as he managed to worm his way out of a huge holiday with a convoluted explanation as to why odds-on favourite No Retreat didn't win the 1m2f maiden at Windsor on Monday evening. He should have been off on a 28-day retreat.

In fairness to Doyle, he said all the right things. He pointed out that he was on an inexperienced horse having only his second run and introduced words like 'lugging', 'wobbling' and being spooked by the winning line. He reminded us that horses aren't machines. Fair point, James, hence you can't ease down on them as they might think they've done enough.

Anyway, the stewards must have believed every word he said as he escaped without any punishment whatsoever. It's lucky Aristotle died when he did, because if he had been alive in 2024 and not departed in 322 BC he would have met his match in the Doyler. This was applied equine philosophy, a language most of us will never understand.

Banning jockeys and stopping them from making a living for 28 days is not something I would ever promote, but the problem we have now is that Doylegate has opened up such a colossal can of worms that closing the can is going to prove an awfully arduous task.

If stewards start accepting excuses like the one given by Doyle, where does it all end? The next jockey who eases down and gets caught will have their tale of woe written and rehearsed and will be ultra-prepared for sitting in front of the stewards. Expect words like wobbling and lugging to form part of the script and you can bet your bottom dollar that being spooked by the winning line will be in there too.

That brings us to the concluding 7f handicap at Kempton on Wednesday night, a mere 48 hours after Doylegate. This time it was Callum Shepherd who dropped his hands for one single stride on Thorntonledale Max and got 18 days for that split-second.

Callum Shepherd: the Royal Ascot-winning rider has had a rollercoaster season
Callum Shepherd: 18-day ban after being caught napping at Kempton
Credit: Alan Crowhurst
To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure that split-second made any difference to the outcome as surely the momentum of the previous stride carried Thorntonledale Max to the line. The subsequently much-debated photo-finish revealed a dead-heat and you wonder whether Shepherd would have been suspended at all had the furore not unfolded at Windsor earlier in the week.

Harsh as it seems, the only way to stop this recent scourge on the sport is to issue lengthy bans for incidents like Shepherd's. That's the only way to curb this disturbing new trend.

Don't forget it was only April of last year when Pat Cosgrave's smooth flight on Concorde turned into the bumpiest landing of his life when he tried to showboat on George Boughey's gelding at Chelmsford and was made to look a right pillock by My Roxanne, who sneaked up his inner to score by a nose.

Four similar incidents in 16 months is four too many, never mind three in three weeks. It's gone beyond a joke. We need to create a culture where riding out to the line is one of the most fundamental aspects of being a jockey. And, by that, I don't mean hitting a horse when he or she is 20 lengths clear. It is merely a case of pushing every horse out until a stride past the line. Simple.

Talk to any young pony rider and they will tell you the two things that are instilled in them from day one is that the start is your problem and you ride out to the line. It is like five-year-old kids learning the alphabet in their first few weeks in school. It's A, B, C stuff and yet here we are with seasoned pros not getting the simplest things right.

It’s funny, there are all these recent cases in Britain of horses not winning when they should have because of showboating in the saddle, but it is hard to remember any incidents in Ireland. The only one that springs to mind was Davy Russell on Rebel Fitz in the 2012 Galway Hurdle. He began celebrating a stride or two before the line and was almost caught by Cause Of Causes. He held on by a head, and I’d say he still gets cold shivers down his spine when he thinks about it.

There was, of course, Roger Loughran on Central House in a Grade 1 chase at Leopardstown back in 2005, but that was different. He mistook the winning post for the end of the rail. That wasn’t showboating.

It makes you wonder whether this is a British problem rather than an Irish one. That said, there are a lot more races so it is only natural that it happens more often over there.

But, the thing is, it shouldn’t happen at all. This is one area of the sport where we should be adopting a zero-tolerance approach. It is hard enough to win races for an owner, a trainer, and a punter, and to throw victories away in the final few strides is unacceptable and should be treated as such.

My proposal would be to introduce a 40-day ban for any jockey who eases up in the closing stages and loses a race he or she should have won from the start of 2025. That would surely be a suitable deterrent. We need to do something drastic, that's for sure. It's becoming an all too common occurrence.
By:
leif
When: 23 Aug 24 21:55
fo0kin nonsense.

a 40 day ban for Shepherd would be grossly unfair.

Human beings make errors of judgement with more than a split second worth of consideration afforded to jockeys.

Need to be careful the sport doesn't hang the individuals from the nearest lamp post just to placate the media/screaming skulls on a forum.

Jennings is a media puppet.
By:
penzance
When: 23 Aug 24 22:00
Some people just make mistakes.40 days loss of earnings with
prize money percentage,bit over the top to me.The D/Heaters
never actually lost their races.
By:
leif
When: 23 Aug 24 22:04
Jockeys are up before the sun rises riding out, travelling to courses up and down the country attempting to cover afternoon and evening meetings sustained with just a water biscuit and a sip of water to keep their weight in check.

'Working' 7 days a week (how many hours do these guys put in ffs) and having to keep their critical faculties at 100% optimum level.

Then some fat barsteward like Jennings (who look like he's not skipped breakfast this millenium) to advocate they lose 40 days income because he says it happens too often

WACCry
By:
leif
When: 23 Aug 24 22:09
Jennings should be made to apologise to those that keep him gainfully employed iso that his waistline is amply nourished while they are often suffering all kinds of problems least of which is often psychological issues that lead to all sorts of self imposed abuse.

absolute melt that ****
By:
Cider
When: 23 Aug 24 22:35
Jockeys make a lot of sacrifices but they wilfully opt for that life as opposed to a regular joe job. That's kind of irrelevant.

None of the recent ones were showboating however. Coincidence that we had three in short succession, but it's only really a story as Doyle bizarrely escaped sanction.
By:
differentdrum
When: 23 Aug 24 22:35
No great fan of Jennings, but at least he has tried to address the situation. If you put a number on something there's always someone who is going to get upset. It's either too harsh, or too lenient. It has to be strong enough to mean something.

Not banning Doyle was a clear mistake, and I'm not sure why that couldn't have been put right. The Stewards on that night clearly didn't know what they were doing and should be stood down themselves until they have a clear grasp of what is expected.

The Stewards in general just haven't been doing their job properly over many years, in fact have they ever done it properly? That's why it may seem like a sea change. All jocks should be riding through the line to the maximum number of places being offered. That shouldn't be impossible, but if it takes long bans to encourage them to do this then so be it, and all jocks should be treated equally with no get outs for the top dogs.
By:
leif
When: 23 Aug 24 22:46
Train drivers have driven through red lights, bus/lorry drivers have driven into bridges lower than their vehicle height, pilots have crashed into mountains, jockeys have lapsed concentration yards before the jamstick.


Do they all do it purposely?

Unless it's crooked, a suicide mission we have to make allowances for human frailties.
By:
Cider
When: 23 Aug 24 23:03
In my industry you get severe fines for an error. The only professional area where miscreants get away scot free (often promoted) is the public sector.
By:
the dealer
When: 23 Aug 24 23:04
40 days, 50 days, 100 days, even a life ban won't stop it. In all levels of life people have and people will, make horrendous mistakes.
By:
leif
When: 23 Aug 24 23:14
The only professional area where miscreants get away scot free (often promoted) is the public sector.

making an honest mistake definitely doesn't make you a miscreant [an unlawful, deliberate action]

The worst case for me this year of those victims of miscreancy was the Dill** pulling of a hoss that should have won IMO.


worlds apart from instances that fatboy Jennings wants classing as hanging offences.
By:
Cider
When: 23 Aug 24 23:31
A miscreant is:
Someone who behaves badly or does not obey rules
A person who has done something wrong or illegal
One who behaves criminally or viciously


No point in getting bogged down in semantics. Jockeys know they have to ride out to the line and achieve the best possible placing. Some of them don't and then face sanctions for breaking the rules. Well, most of them!
Page 4 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com