why would you expect the fav and 2nd fav to win a race as competitive as that ?.....no value whatsoever no I didn't have a bet in the race but backing favs in those sort of races leads one way ..........the poorhouse !
why would you expect the fav and 2nd fav to win a race as competitive as that ?.....no value whatsoever no I didn't have a bet in the race but backing favs in those sort of races leads one way ..........the poorhouse !
I find that very believable Clarke. Pundits were highlighting high drawn horses as the place to be on the near rail 1st and 2nd drawn in the highest boxes. With these things you have to ignore the form of the nags and just trust the draw.
I find that very believable Clarke. Pundits were highlighting high drawn horses as the place to be on the near rail1st and 2nd drawn in the highest boxes.With these things you have to ignore the form of the nags and just trust the draw.
It's the age of guesswork for punters who actually think they're using a criteria by picking one in the top handful odds thinking the rest have no chance as their odds reflect....
Around 2.5% would probably have backed the winner based on its 40/1 at the local bookies.
If the horse was 9/1 at the bookies then it's unbelievably feasible to assume 10% would have backed it.
Oblivious to the fact it's the same horse with obviously the same credentials.
I'd be as certain as i can be that at least 80% of the 98% that historically lose use odds as the selection criteria and consequently have never not only looked " outside the box " they don't even know the box exists.
Good luck today guys
It's the age of guesswork for punters who actually think they're using a criteria by picking one in the top handful odds thinking the rest have no chance as their odds reflect....Around 2.5% would probably have backed the winner based on its 40/1 at
Get It was 66/1 with Hills when I posted it as my selection in Div 2 of the Naps comp on Saturday morning.
I was so excited at the prospect of a big winner that I even forgot to remove the dart!
Get It was 66/1 with Hills when I posted it as my selection in Div 2 of the Naps comp on Saturday morning.I was so excited at the prospect of a big winner that I even forgot to remove the dart!
Never mind Goodwood, I have had a tough run with the flat so far this year.
Not sure if the constant watering of courses has some effect, the form does not seem to transfer from course to course like it used to. Just an observation on my part, no stats to back it up. The draw very often does not pan out as advertised and can vary from day to day at courses like, Ascot, Haydock,York and Doncaster, again just a perception on my part.
The bigger yards seem to throw in a few stinking favourites as well. Not a Saturday goes by without at least one mutiple bet buster for the bookies. No sugggestion they are in collision to help fund the levy, but at times I do wonder.
Fewer offers from bookies too, and how often can you get a quarter odds a place these days? Since sp from the course's stopped, the top three in the market seem shorter, again just a feeling, no stats.
Too many low grade meetings of class 6 handicaps is of no help. Niether is synthetic racing all through the summer, simply no need for it. Prize money is so bad you might as well run a few times to get the handicap mark down and a better price when it is off. Hardly a decent handicap is won these days except by the horses specfically targeted for it. Always gone on I know, just seems more of it.
I try to to factor these things into my betting. You can if you wish watch the market just before the off and follow the money.if you want, but I bet for a bet of fun, like to pick the winner myself. I do an ew multiple every day and a few singles on here. Used to do well on bf multiples, that has gone now, many firms wont lay a decent bet, only wanting the smaller punters.
All in all, with restrictions and the worry of account closure combined with my comments above, I have found my turnover over and size of bets is reducing and would not be at all surprised if there others feeling a bit the same way.
Not about to pack up but it just the seems the value has been squeezed everywhere, a couple of the big three reduced their maximum payouts recently. It reminds me of the days when they started reducing the forecast odds on the wall chart and the introduced computor forecasts instead.
Never mind Goodwood, I have had a tough run with the flat so far this year.Not sure if the constant watering of courses has some effect, the form does not seem to transfer from course to course like it used to. Just an observation on my part, no stat
"33% won by fav..." What sort of fav? 1/10, 1/5, 1/3, 1/2, 4/6, 1/1, 3/1, 5/1, 7/1, 9/1 or 12/1? If the fav are shorties then I'll tend to agree with you.
Royal Ascot and Goodwood were brutal in terms of betting. Luckily I only had 6 bets at the most; 4 winners, 2 losers. It would have been a calamity if I'd anymore. And, Irish racing is a no-go for me 95% of the time.
"33% won by fav..."What sort of fav? 1/10, 1/5, 1/3, 1/2, 4/6, 1/1, 3/1, 5/1, 7/1, 9/1 or 12/1? If the fav are shorties then I'll tend to agree with you.Royal Ascot and Goodwood were brutal in terms of betting. Luckily I only had 6 bets at the most;
What difference does it make impossible, a fav is a fav regardless of price which is what the percentage is about, in answer to barstool though the answer is no an LSP would not be possible backing them.
What difference does it make impossible, a fav is a fav regardless of price which is what the percentage is about, in answer to barstool though the answer is no an LSP would not be possible backing them.