|
By:
Can't copy & paste either.
|
|
By:
Don't worry Penzance, Lay can't google.
|
|
By:
Thanks Mr C but that article is 5 and a half years old. I still can't "google" the numbers tested at this years festival. and have no idea that that policy still exists given the changes within the BHA since then.
|
|
By:
penzance 25 Mar 24 21:19
Sorry can't do links.It's a Guardian piece. From Sept 1st year of article. What was the story headline as I can't find the guardian story so far and I'm a subscriber. |
|
By:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2018/nov/27/horse-racing-news-tips
|
|
By:
Only article found in September 2023 was regarding Luke Comer.
|
|
By:
Does anyone seriously think that Mullins and co are doping horses? One slip up, one set of loose lips and the whole thing would be blown apart. Remember when Martin Pipe was dominating racing -it was down to training not doping.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Newland is right about a few things even if the article sounds like some ramblings. The idea of banning Irish runners would utterly destroy and finish the sport. Its a bizarre opinion.
Its great the likes of Cheveley Park, Munir and Souede are called out. The onus needs to be on British owners to support domestic trainers rather than just following success. How egotistical and superficial is that? It goes without saying that the BHA should be able to randomnly test Irish horses in Ireland if these horses are partaking in races under the umbrella of the BHA. If they cannot (I'm not sure if this is being done currently) it brings the races into disrepute. |
|
By:
It is not in the BHA's interest to find any major doping. They are there to promote racing as squeaky clean.
|
|
By:
absolutely correct ^ but even for optics alone it should be done imho
|
|
By:
Loved the last 30min reading this fred and the brain dead posts from those thinking of skullduggery
![]() |
|
By:
And love Racing queen last post,I'll have another Bushmills
|
|
By:
Call me naive but I couldn't entertain Mullins having anything to do with underhanded practices, he strikes me as the nicest man in the sport, always comes across as a perfect gentleman and probably what keeps his owners happy is that he is VERY likeable, I love listening to his interviews.
And when he does get his statue it should be one with him doffing his hat as he always does at the end of an interview. ![]() |
|
By:
Newland is a doctor. What would he do if another doctor set up in his area and took away a load of his patients? Write to the General Medical Council and try to ban the other doc. He's a total prat!
|
|
By:
Newland is a Jealous loser, a trainer of mediocre horses running in mediocre races who wants to drag the successful trainers down to his level which all people jealous of sucess try to do to cover their own inadequacies.
. |
|
By:
Duffy
It’s amazing how often he will hold doors open for other racegoers gives the a smile or touches his hat if it’s a female. |
|
By:
Mullins was no gentleman towards Lavinia Taylor, trainer of the 2002 Hennessy winner Gingembre. She had to wait 21 months to receive the prize money, because of Mullins' incessant, whining appeals against Be My Royal's disqualification, his horse having failed a dope test. The connections of Gingembre never, ever had the satisfaction of receiving the trophy to display.
Mullins was still pursuing the matter through the High Court (unsuccessfully) three years after the race. |
|
By:
Age may have changed him screaming.
|
|
By:
The race just run at Southwell was titled bet £10 and get £40 with bet mgm the powers that be don’t seem to concerned about the way they operate.
Subject was brought up earlier on the thread. |
|
By:
"ts great the likes of Cheveley Park, Munir and Souede are called out. The onus needs to be on British owners to support domestic trainers rather than just following success. How egotistical and superficial is that?"
The above owners do not have a problem using British trainers for their flat horses. Munir did have horses with Newland in the past |
|
By:
Maybe they don't have a problem because they believe there is no real difference between Britsh and Irish flat trainers at the highest level. However, strangely enough the same owners and others, seem to believe that there actually is where jump trainers are concerned.
I personally cannot bring myself to believe that there is such a disparity between the training abilities of Nicholls, Henderson, Skelton etc and the top Irish trainers. Or is it just that the scouts for these top British trainers have faded away and the current bunch are on a par with the scouts employed by Chelsea nowadays for example?! Btw, Richard Newland has Dr in front of his name, a title(or similar), that those on here slagging him off could only have a wet dream about having. There is no smoke without fire and people have to be very careful about what they say and how they get their point of view across without being sued for libel. |
|
By:
Are you the good doctor?
|
|
By:
He doesn't come across as an educated man.
|
|
By:
Tom Segal RP
--------------- Paul Nicholls' cornflakes must be strewn all over his kitchen. Since the Cheltenham Festival and even before it, there has been more than the odd article about how British trainers have got complacent and have allowed Willie Mullins to take over, but if ever there was a man who would never rest on his laurels, it's Nicholls. The truth of the matter is that jump racing has become a race to the top financially and he and most of the other British trainers simply cannot compete with Mullins. That is no different from any other sport where those with the most money take over – Manchester City are the most obvious example – and the thought of Nicholls, Dan Skelton, Ben Pauling or Nicky Henderson being complacent is just plain wrong. Let's not forget that Henderson would have trained the favourites for the Champion Hurdle and the Triumph, and the second favourites for the Champion Chase and Gold Cup if his string hadn't gone down with the lurgy. One of my favourite films is The Untouchables which is about the downfall of Al Capone and one of the famous Sean Connery delivered lines in it is that you can't bring a knife to a gunfight, but that is exactly what British trainers did at this Cheltenham and many before. Personally, I think the British trainers overachieved this year and Mullins underachieved. Given their respective firepower, Mullins should really have had more winners than Britain put together, but he didn't. The question is what British trainers can do to get their hands on the top-class horses who end up going to Closutton and the answer is not an easy one. The perceived wisdom is that British trainers have to get better in their sourcing of the young horses, but it's not like the Flat where the young horses have never run. Everyone knows which of the French horses are good and who the best point-to-pointers are, and they are all going to be sold to the owners with the deepest pockets and then end up with Mullins. Did Willie Mullins underachieve at Cheltenham? Did Willie Mullins underachieve at Cheltenham? Credit: John Grossick (racingpost.com/photos) I hear it said that the British trainers have to get to these horses before Mullins, but imagine if you're a French trainer with a good horse and a Nicholls or a Skelton come knocking. What's the first thing you're going to do? You are going to offer it to the Mullins team, who will pay more. That's simply market forces and, consequently, everyone else ends up with the horses Mullins doesn't want. Would Man City be the team they are if all they got was Liverpool or Arsenal cast-offs? The only answer is for the British owners to stop sending all their horses to Mullins and take a leaf out of the Robcour book, who don't have a single horse at Closutton but had two winners and the second in the Champion Hurdle and Gold Cup. If the double greens, Cheveley Park or Rich Ricci, who are all based in Britain, were to spread their horses out more and have a load more trained in Britain, the whole sport would be transformed instantly and be so much more competitive. You can change as many races as you want at the Cheltenham Festival but until the racing becomes more competitive, it will continue to see the number of racing fans who attend decline. |
|
By:
Tom Segal confirmed himself an idiot there
|
|
By:
Hear that British owners, Sir Tom advises you to send your horses to British trainers and of course he will help out with the costs etc.
|
|
By:
i wish one of these owners would come out and tell all these grifters who put absolutley nothing in to British racing to mind their own buisness when it comes to who they put their horses with.
|
|
By:
what was hendo,s 2nd fav for gold ?
surely not saying.thinking shisken would have been 2nd fav for gold cup |
|
By:
as no one else no,s how does segal no how much mullins pays for his horses ?
|
|
By:
mullins has plenty lapped,pulled up,out with the washing,beaten miles never make track etc,etc is segal saying mullins pays £500,000 + for lots of those ?, its easy to concentrate on winners thinking those are ones he spent most on,how does segal/we no
as talked about before i believe mullins buyers are on a retainer to purchase so many horses a yr with no individual price tags attached, maybe 25 horse for £10 million every year as an example |
|
By:
Say a breeder or a breeder's agent sold Mullins ,just saying, Quevega, Annie Powers, Vroom Vroom Mags, or a host of others. Let's say the following year's stock are ready for sale, do you offer your 3rd foal to Nichols or Skelton or Dr.Richard Newland for £200,000/£220,000 or to Mr. Mullins for £180.000 ? I know what I would do.
|
|
By:
CROPSICK 27 Mar 24 13:26
i wish one of these owners would come out and tell all these grifters who put absolutley nothing in to British racing to mind their own buisness when it comes to who they put their horses with. Their money and their choice and nothing to do with anyone else. |
|
By:
Exactly sparrow that is what i am saying.
|
|
By:
Haven't read through all of this but do recall one of the presenters at the Cheltenham festival whilst commenting on Mullins dominance, said that some of these graded winners that Mullins had acquired at the sales, had Nicholls as the under bidder. Saying that if the potential owners had pushed the boat out a little more then they would have been in Nicholls yard not Mullins, food for thought.
Similarly you could say the same on the flat with the best bred horses going to Coolmore and Godolphin because they pay the most for the best horses. |
|
By:
Nice bit of training by the good doctor
![]() |
|
By:
Yes there was.
|
|
By:
Showed a lot of patients with that.
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
nichols was the under bidder
wasnt what i heard from chelt,what i heard on tv from numerous presenters/pundits was that no one else gets the chance to bid for these horses, peter scu on lucky said he,d been round all these selleres yards in france,ire etc and those showing him round would point to horse after horse,mullins bought that one,that one,that one,wasnt offering scu anything to buy, if you dont no what mullins is paying how can you be an under bidder ? |