There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Is there much difference in speed? I'm on sky and possibly looking to switch to virgin, so long as I can carry on my subs at £10 per month with Racing TV.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 43
|
By:
Cable is faster than satellite…..
|
|
By:
Well you won't get Racing TV Extra, or any offers on tickets etc. You wouldn't recognised as a subscriber. As far as I aware Virgin don't offer any reductions in price.
|
|
By:
formoftheace • January 30, 2024 11:29 AM GMT
Cable is faster than satellite….. can you elaborate? |
|
By:
Well known to most cable is faster….
I’ve had both in the past and found cable faster,regarding in running purposes I don’t entertain in running… Browsing etc cable is best imv |
|
By:
Although,most engineers will say it works faster if you are close to the exchange…..
|
|
By:
sky ( SSR and RTV) via internet cable is faster than via satellite?
|
|
By:
I make RTV 7 seconds behind on-line v. satellite.
|
|
By:
where does Virgin cable fit in?
|
|
By:
Just got email RTV going up to £30 a month, a lot more mouths to feed, some may say about 50% too many mouths.
|
|
By:
On the subject of club day tickets has anyone else been only receiving 1 emailed ticket, depsite having applied for two?
|
|
By:
swiftynifty 31 Jan 24 10:38
Just got email RTV going up to £30 a month, a lot more mouths to feed, some may say about 50% too many mouths. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- oh dear... that's me out then.. i'm not paying £1 a day to feed Kevin O'Ryan / Lisa O'Neil / Donald Maclean / that Bull bloke / the bloke who says 'fascinating' 1000 times per meeting / Martin Dwyer / Paul Mulrennan / and virtually every other RTV presenter/pundit who adopts a see no evil hear no evil policy. thanx for the memories tho. |
|
By:
I got two for Cheltenham last Saturday, despite only asking for one!
|
|
By:
I might just cancel racing TV if its gone up in price. I'm only gambling now and again at the big meetings. I've already cancelled racingpost subs as its far too expensive for the already-acted-upon content. In addition, the betfair site is awful now with the bots controlling direction of moves. I can't get a good bet on in a shop and I've been banned from every bookie online. Greed has destroyed the industry.
|
|
By:
Greed is a terrible thing revs...
shedloads of it about unfortunately. |
|
By:
Greed has certainly played a huge part in in running liquidity being so utterly dire now imv.
|
|
By:
screamingbtw, it sounds like you got mine!!
|
|
By:
if ive just agreed a one year contract with them at a cheaper price (£12.49 per month) can they move that up mid term?
Or as im guessing that was half price , can they move it up pro rata to £14.99 ? |
|
By:
The price was already ridiculous for a single stand alone channel, but £30? Same with the Racing Post being the price of a glossy magazine.
The increase beggars belief when you consider they have lost Newbury. Shame they can't lose a few more. It just relies on the racing audience having more money than sense. I am on a fixed term contract with Virgin so will see if that changes. If it does I will cancel at the end of the jumps season. Couldn't give two hoots about paying to watch Flat racing. It's a yawnfest. |
|
By:
RTV generally faster over sat than cable, think there’s some miscommunication going on here, there’s always been politics involved and there was a period pics over cable were actually faster than sat but that’s the exception to the rule mainly.
Think people got mixed up with cable internet that’s generally faster. Either way, if you are worried about speed then LV is as fast as you’ll get, the tv pics are paid for excess and slower whichever way you receive em. On the subject of price, anyone daft enough to pay full price need their bumps feeling. RTV want their cake and eat it. They sell the rights to bookies and want to sell them to punters. If all you want em for is IR then pay em nowt or next to nowt on the knowledge you can break their balls and not care if they don’t offer you a constant deal. It’s like owt in life, fools subsidise the shrewd, and in RTVs case they want to sell you other people’s opinions on what you can determine yourself, just as with tipping lines. |
|
By:
and in RTVs case they want to sell you other people’s opinions on what you can determine yourself
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- absolutely... other people's opinions i personally couldn't give a t0$$ about... as i've said many a time on here... if these folk are so good they wouldn't be pundits on the telly imv. |
|
By:
I wouldn’t pay for RTV even with a few million in the coffers…
Same old same old day in day out…..ground,handicap mark Bla Bla …..not for me anymore |
|
By:
forgot to mention that Dan Barber bloke above tbh...
awful. |
|
By:
happy, does this mean you like all the others?
I think it's a real shame that you don't get a cheaper option minus any pundits. |
|
By:
it does not tbh defferentdrum...
i'm not saying they are bad people... just not interested in what they think tbh... and the fact none of them ever spot anything iffy going on is quite hideous imv... well in fact they might well spot it... but never say so... which isn't good enough for me. |
|
By:
They have jobs which many people would struggle to consider to be work. They keep those jobs by ignoring anything negative. Keeping the job is more important to them than being honest with the viewer. I don't think there is any other sport that provides anything like so much unchallenged cheerleading.
|
|
By:
presenters/pundits/commentators in all sports these days are pretty much the same imv differentdrum...
totally avoid anything negative... concentrate / accentuate anything positive they can cling on to... and generally make out everyone and everything in the sport is utterly utterly wonderful... it's not just horse racing imv... my mate says IPL cricket is hideously bad for it... i just can't listen to it no longer... ends up winding me up. |
|
By:
Just got an email saying they're putting the price up to 30 quid. Not a cat in hell's chance I'll be paying that.
|
|
By:
strontium 31 Jan 24 15:48
Just got an email saying they're putting the price up to 30 quid. Not a cat in hell's chance I'll be paying that. £30 for what and to whom? |
|
By:
Racing TV subscription on Sky, monthly. From March.
|
|
By:
I have Sky and RTV paying £18 a month and have now discovered this on the website.....
We value your continued support, and it’s important to us that you understand the reasons behind the forthcoming adjustment to your membership fee – the first in eight years. Starting from March 2024, the new monthly fee for Racing TV will be £29.98 - still less than £1 a day. Your monthly payments will not be affected until after your promotional period ends, when you will be billed the new monthly subscription price. You don’t have to do anything, but if you would like to discuss your account you can call us on 0344 855 2977. |
|
By:
We value your continued support...but we have endless pundits/presenters to pay for (who have absolutely now to say) and we want you mugs to fund their lifestyle...
thank you for being so kind. |
|
By:
Crazy price.
|
|
By:
4 pundits / presenters on a wednesday night at Kempton...
no i don't think i'll be funding that tbh. |
|
By:
No chance of me paying £30 after March.
|
|
By:
well said sparrow.
|
|
By:
Cable ought to be faster than satellite unless the feeds are deliberately manipulated.
The journey up and down to geostationary orbit adds about half a second due to speed of light constraints. |
|
By:
whenever I've timed a virgin cable RTV viewer v. my SKY satellite RTV, relayed on the phone, satellite was ahead. So has that changed?
|
|
By:
and what did i say...
4 of them for a wednesday night at kempton... you think i'm paying for that ? forget it. |
|
By:
All that is needed tonight is Rachel Candelora, the rest add nothing at all.
|