stewards Kempers they saying..

fair nudge and very slight winning margin

should have been called a lot earlier imo, this will go

Surely nothing in that.

definite interference of some sort

Don't know, but slightest of distance.

It's marginal but a slight bump and only a nose in it so I think it should go.

jump the last over the 3rd panel end up on the far rail, with nose dist

clearly caused by the fptp

They've thrown some out with 0 contact, so this should go

Might go, 2nd 65 in running!

slight nudge..no momentum lost..2nd was in front 30yds out...did it improve its position?  no imo

has only won inches fair enuff but harsh to disq.

3.8 if you think it should go

wouldnt want to take 1.37 keep race.

Where they ended up on the track was irrelevant because they both pointed that way independently in the last 100 yards. There was a small bump about 50 yards out, that's what the stewards will be looking at.

im not sure it's enough to warrant a dq

If in doubt chuck it out

Contact is almost certain to make some difference - a nose? Yes.

Moore stable hoping, as 1st race big priced 3rd that was well backed for a place late!

wish that was the rule werbie

Who knows with stewards, but before the bump, the 2nd had just taken the lead, but then lost it again after the bump. The jock has a clear case to argue there imo. Should be reversed.

Of course could be another joke one, where they just make up their own rules, as we've seen so many times

elise Joined: 04 Jan 03
Replies: 3699013 Jan 24 13:08 
wish that was the rule werbie


Same

that 3.5 would have been torched

FPTP regained the lead at a different point to where the bump occurred. No obvious momentum lost on the 2nd. Keeps it IMO.

Not got involved just stating my views. Its a 50/50 imo. Ive been stung far to many times on stewards

All depends how much gin & sherry the stewards have had.

Watch market in abit, when someone knows result!!!!!!!!!!!!!

^ tbf that only happens in Oireland

fairweather 13 Jan 24 13:09 
Who knows with stewards, but before the bump, the 2nd had just taken the lead, but then lost it again after the bump. The jock has a clear case to argue there imo. Should be reversed.


2nd was sh hd in front 30 yds out.

winner keep it

Stands

stands

no consistency

Stewards Enquiry - Result Stands

wouldnt have been shocked if they'd booted it, wish they were consistent

I would of thrown out winner, if I was a steward.

wd rico..different gravy son.

Jan 13, 2024 -- 1:18PM, elise wrote:

wouldnt have been shocked if they'd booted it, wish they were consistent

cant even follow their own guidelines laughable

that's why i have sympathy with those taking the alternate view, we keep hitting the same issues and it's a whim sometimes

Jan 13, 2024 -- 1:18PM, Rico-Dangleflaps wrote:

wd rico..different gravy son.

Were you in balls deep on the photo?

Stupid decision, but as so often...

Please do not amend any results in future then...oh no, they will just do the opposite next time with 0 contact like before...etc etc

booting out a kempton,hendo  trained, winning fav on a saturday in a 50/50 call
stewards decided NOT WORTH THE HASSLE OR BRIC BATS

stu 13 Jan 24 13:20 
Stupid decision, but as so often...

stupid decision?  was a slight nudge 1f out..did it improve its position? No...2nd was in front 30yds out..was the correct decision  (imo).

stand by all I've said rico - cant be arsed to post it again...stupid decision.

sorry for your loss..youl gerrit back.

If this wasn't a Henderson horse, been a different result?!!

isnt relevant