Picking winners - Beyer Beyer on speed - Beyer The winning horseplayer - Beyer My $50k year at the races - Beyer Mordin on speed - Mordin Blinkers off - Cary Fotias
Handicapping:
braddocks complete guide to horserace section and betting - peter braddock this is the bible of form analysis which is a must for beginners
ainslies complete guide to thoroughbred racing - ainslie . basically the USA version of the above
one hundred hints for better bettting - mark cotton. i recommend that EVERYONE reads this book. it will instantly save you money by cutting out the simple mistakes that we all regularly make!
betting for a living. nick mordin. an old book and before computer formbooks were invented but a brilliant read
How to compile your own handicap - David Dickinson a really old book but brilliant. handicapping 101 always back winners - stewart simpson good for a few laughs throughbred pedigrees simplified - miles napier against the odds - david lee priest the inside track - the professional approach. alan potts
in search of the wiining system . peter may. good intro to systems
the wiining look. nick mordin. really useful to gain an understanding of paddock inspection
value betting - mark coton. already mentioned below. an absolute must read to understand the basics of value and bookmaking
horseracing - a guide to profitable betting. peter may. another really good intro to systems
I hope that this selection helps.
Hi seaside, All these are great:Speed ratings:Picking winners - BeyerBeyer on speed - BeyerThe winning horseplayer - BeyerMy $50k year at the races - BeyerMordin on speed - MordinBlinkers off - Cary FotiasHandicapping:braddocks complete guide to hors
The "Stewart Simpson" book is absolute garbage, might as well be a 1970s sex comedy. Peter May and David Lee Priest carry the flag for over thinking, as does Nick Mordin sometimes, although the Winning Look is interesting. I agree with the rest. It's true to say most are outdated, but the basics are still essential grounding.
The "Stewart Simpson" book is absolute garbage, might as well be a 1970s sex comedy. Peter May and David Lee Priest carry the flag for over thinking, as does Nick Mordin sometimes, although the Winning Look is interesting. I agree with the rest. It's
This book is the bestselling sensation that will change the way you think about business and the world. It is all about luck: more precisely, how we perceive luck in our personal and professional experiences. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the markets - we hear an entrepreneur has 'vision' or a trader is 'talented', but all too often their performance is down to chance rather than skill. It is only because we fail to understand probability that we continue to believe events are non-random, finding reasons where none exist.
'One of the smartest books of all time' Fortune 'An iconoclastic tour de force ... nothing escapes his Exocets' Evening Standard 'Brilliant' John Kay 'Excellent and thought-provoking ... an entertaining book' Financial Times 'Wall Street's principal dissident' Malcolm Gladwell
Nassim Nicholas Taleb is an uncompromising no-nonsense thinker for our times. He has spent his life immersing himself in problems of luck, uncertainty, probability, and knowledge, and he has led three high-profile careers around his ideas, as a man of letters, as a businessman-trader, and as a university professor and researcher. He is currently Distinguished Professor of Risk Engineering at New York University's School of Engineering. He is the author of the 4-volume INCERTO (Antifragile, The Black Swan, Fooled by Randomness, and The Bed of Procrustes). Taleb refuses all awards and honours as they debase knowledge by turning it into competitive sports.
Each to their own though , obviously not for everyone and certainly not for those who refuse to change their methods
Fooled by Randomness by Nassim Nicholas Talib.This book is the bestselling sensation that will change the way you think about business and the world. It is all about luck: more precisely, how we perceive luck in our personal and professional experien
Mordin not fit to write Russ Clarke's betting slips out. I've backed more double figure winners than you can shake a stick at as a result of reading Russ's book.
Mordin not fit to write Russ Clarke's betting slips out. I've backed more double figure winners than you can shake a stick at as a result of reading Russ's book.
Against the crowd strategies should be integrated somehow into all punters heads , why would anyone want to follow a 98% long term losing crowd.
If you're looking in Alan , you're sadly missed by all.
Against the crowd strategies should be integrated somehow into all punters heads , why would anyone want to follow a 98% long term losing crowd.If you're looking in Alan , you're sadly missed by all.
Stew - no, rare as hen's teeth. Saw a copy a couple of years ago on ebay. The seller let it go for twenty five quid, obviously had no idea what it was really worth.
Stew - no, rare as hen's teeth. Saw a copy a couple of years ago on ebay. The seller let it go for twenty five quid, obviously had no idea what it was really worth.
Stew - no, rare as hen's teeth. Saw a copy a couple of years ago on ebay. The seller let it go for twenty five quid, obviously had no idea what it was really worth.
Stew - no, rare as hen's teeth. Saw a copy a couple of years ago on ebay. The seller let it go for twenty five quid, obviously had no idea what it was really worth.
I dispute that Hayden. 99% losing crowd would be more accurate.
Gamblers are dreamers. Fantasists full of hard luck stories.
You need an edge and if you have one, you might win. Nobody can win betting horses pre-race.
I dispute that Hayden. 99% losing crowd would be more accurate.Gamblers are dreamers. Fantasists full of hard luck stories.You need an edge and if you have one, you might win. Nobody can win betting horses pre-race.
... and I include myself in the 99% bracket. Sure you`ll get the occasional big win or profitable week. But no matter how much one wins, we all want more. There is no finishing line. To perhaps win you need Discipline and 99% of gamblers have no discipline. That`s a fact. Why? Because gambling is more addictive than cocaine.
... and I include myself in the 99% bracket. Sure you`ll get the occasional big win or profitable week. But no matter how much one wins, we all want more. There is no finishing line. To perhaps win you need Discipline and 99% of gamblers have no disc