|
By:
dothey get their dough back ?
|
|
By:
After only one race. Should the 1st race have gone ahead? It can only happen in Ireland!
|
|
By:
I'm sure workrider will be on to you for that,impossible123....if he manages not to get lost in the fog...
|
|
By:
Whilst in England they don't make much effort at all and call it off too early.
They give it every chance and rightly so , as presenter said it was clear a mile away so every chance it would clear up. |
|
By:
The meeting should not have gone on, period! I think the start time (if so) ought to have been delayed for 30mins or 1hr, and reassessed. But....
|
|
By:
At 13:28 you were asking should they have raced the first and stating anyway it could only happen in Ireland then at 13:39 you were a critic of racing at all.
Either you haven't given it much thought but in a few mins had made you mind up who's to blame anyway or .....can't think of an alternative. |
|
By:
unbearable, as well as being awesomely tedious, is one of the biggest nobheads even aboard this ship of fools so anything he posts is to disregarded
|
|
By:
^
Correct mitolo. |
|
By:
could be he done his dough on the fav and the pocket is screaming!
|
|
By:
I was only interested in the Lawlors (2pm); checked-in at 1.25pm and found the 1st had taken place - not 2nd (I wondered why). Clearly then, a valid question to ask if 1st should have gone ahead. No!
The reference to Ireland was made tongue-in-cheek. Then again why did the course not postpone start time until visibility was better? |
|
By:
On the other thread at 13:25 you posted abandoned ? no more racing on card.
An awful lot went through your head maybe between 13:25 and 13:39 but the vast majority was how best to target criticism rather than think through any process. With respect impossible it seems all you've posted is an agenda with a disregard for any consideration of the facts. Good luck today ![]() |
|
By:
Irish Racing rarely interests me only for future pointers ie Cheltenham (today). My 1.25pm on another thread was genuinely unsure what'd happened. However, as I was refreshing I saw another thread that indicated Naas abandoned.
To be frank I do not give much thought to others nit-picking (negatively) for my genuine but at times contradicting or non-conducive posts to others. This is a public forum, and as such, anyone is free to post one's opinion - considered or not. If non-conducive the ignore button is there for a specific reason. But, would anyone not agree why proceed with race 1 at Naas today? Why professional prudence not exercised and deferred 1st race to a later time to gauge possible visibility improvement? |
|
By:
the fog had lifted slightly before they jumped off, you could see the last fence from the winning line OK. It worsened during the race. I expect it's all clear there now.
|
|
By:
qed
a veritable titan of tedium |