There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Racing Post Results
Kelso 7:05
6. Minella Youngy 3/1J
7. Getaway Jewel 11/100
Kelso 7:05
6. Minella Youngy 3/1J
7. Getaway Jewel 11/100
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 35
|
By:
Fractional odds. Why do the bookies persist with them? There is no way I can see that they are easier to understand than decimal.
|
|
By:
6.05 KelsoFull Result
1stMinella Youngy (6)3/1Jfav 2nd3LGetaway Jewel (7)11/1 3rd5.5LRestandbethankful (GB) (4)11/2 4th6LFusain (FR) (1)5/1 |
|
By:
I had been hoping that onlooker was giving us the winner of the 7.05 race
 |
|
By:
They corrected it - when the published the Full Result.
|
|
By:
Central European Time - sparrow.
Just flew over to Paris - For a Jambon Butty for my Tea. |
|
By:
I believe you, onlooker
 |
|
By:
Skybet use 17/8.
I kid ye not. |
|
By:
Hello sparrow
Just reading about a game in 1976 East Ham against West Ham playing for East Ham David Webb and the greatest of them all George best playing for West Ham Bobby Moore ,Malcom Allison,Jimmy greaves,terry venables and harry rednapp, Entrance 45 pence |
|
By:
sparrow/jimnast
went to Upton park on a Wednesday night with Darlo in 1975; it was a cup match; Darlo had 2 special trains don't know if you remember them? All the Darlo fans met up at whitechapel what a place. some players from the west ham squad, Mervin Day, Billy Bonds, Frank Lampard and Clive Best, Darlo got beat 3 nil:( |
|
By:
Can't recall that game ronnie but that would be Clyde Best and Whitechapel I knew very well but not a place to be at night.
Jimnast, Would that have been some sort of Charity match? |
|
By:
Hello Ronnie who beat Darlington in the 1999/2000 fa cup ?
Hope your well |
|
By:
sparrow , it was Frank Lampard's testimonial.
|
|
By:
Jimnast.
Another team who played in claret and blue. Getting there thank you looking forward to a week in the lakes next week. |
|
By:
I can still see old Frank dancing round that corner flag at Elland Road after scoring against Everton in the 1980 FA Cup so surely not his testimonial 4 years earlier, swifty!
|
|
By:
Who else ronnie
|
|
By:
sparrow, it was, i guess testimonials worked a bit differently in those days, obv now it's 10 years etc.
|
|
By:
I wouldn't have known that but it's ridiculous with so many years left to play and with Lampard's finest hour amongst them.
|
|
By:
maybe he played for both sides he was born in East Ham!
|
|
By:
Jimnast.
Did Darlo go further than your team. |
|
By:
Of course they did Ronnie which is why you got beat twice
|
|
By:
Born in East Ham so played on the home ground at Upton Park presumably.
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Sparrow who were West Ham playing when pop robson scored that great goal I don’t remember the opposition.
|
|
By:
longbridge -- "Fractional odds. Why do the bookies persist with them? There is no way I can see that they are easier to understand than decimal."
Fractional odds are far easier to understand than decimals, provided you realise they are completely misnamed; they are not fractions at all, they are ratios. |
|
By:
He scored so many jimnast but maybe against Derby in the 1970s.
|
|
By:
@ramruma
I'm not bad at mental arithmetic, but surely it is easier to know that if I back a horse for £10 at 1.73 I get £17.30 back than working out £10 times (1 + 8/11) in your head? Let alone working out if 11/8 is better than 7/5 etc. |
|
By:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKRB9VJp-24
|
|
By:
The one that won goal of the season it was always on the start of match of the day
|
|
By:
Gillingham as well as villa beat Darlington in that seasons fa cup ronnie.
|
|
By:
longbridge -- yes, but otoh it is easier to see that if you stake £4 at 11/4 you stand to win £11 than multiply £4 by 2.75. It must be admitted the traditional odds used to make more sense with old money.
|
|
By:
Conversely - Looking it at the other angle of Punting - which is primarilaly far more important than just 'how much do you stand to win' ...
Seasoned Punters KNOW instantly the ASSET Value of 11/8 - set against the adjoining odds of 5/4 and 6/4 - Whereas ... I just had to do a somewhat long-winded Mathematical calculation of ... - multiply 8 by 5 = 40 (for 11/8) - and 8 times 5 (for 7/5) ... THEN - 5 times 11 (for 11/8) - and 8 times 7 (for 7/5) - in order to determine whether ... 11/8 (= 55/40) is better or worse than 7/5 (= 56/40)  I'll stick with 11/10 - 13/8 - 9/4 and 100/30 - Thank you. |
|
By:
ramruma "It must be admitted the traditional odds used to make more sense with old money." - like thinking of 21/20 as betting a pound to win a guinea?
|
|
By:
We grew up with the fractions and somehow managed but no bookmaker these days will want to lay 100/8 rather than 12/1.
|
|
By:
Plenty on course will sparrow
|
|
By:
I expect they will, jimnast.
|