There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 65 comments are related to the topic:
Stewards Chepstow
Stewards Chepstow
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 65
|
By:
2/1 ish to 2.44 last matched
|
|
By:
STANDS
|
|
By:
rico right again
|
|
By:
nice hoovering
|
|
By:
rwesult stands
wd rico..simply the best ever. |
|
By:
Told ya...how did Kirrane get Happier beat there ffs...
|
|
By:
As a Jockey now just as well try anything and that's anything to win,that's the state of racing now that race there, one I backed did'nt beat the ambulance home so no pocket from me but if i was on 2nd id be livid.
|
|
By:
hulk23 20 Jul 23 16:18
have 2/1 someone thinks rico's called this badly ... poor hulk..was on the verge of a ham shank.. |
|
By:
Winner alright ..Winner alright...
|
|
By:
go 1 over with the whip & its 4 day ban but you can carve 1 up & no problem
|
|
By:
Glad i didnt lay off... phew ... stewards are as consistent as thou eh hahahaha
|
|
By:
lovely shout rico
i layed the 3rd, suspected it might not get promoted 2 places. best ever  |
|
By:
when was the last time something got promoted up 2 places in the UK? and has any horse been promoted more places than that in the UK?
|
|
By:
can sum1 ask hulk to poast hids lay of the 3rd as ricardo sez no sign of the betting slip..
|
|
By:
JPSER, there was a race at Ascot in 1974, The Queen Anne stakes, where they chucked out the 1st 3, a horse named Brook who finished 4th got the race.
|
|
By:
ahh, i just posted a thread about it stewarts. thanks. i dont recall anything in my time
|
|
By:
Didn't have an interest in the race but once again I ask two questions :
The jock got 5 days. What should he have done to avoid causing interference? If he had done what the Stewards have said he didn't what effect would that have had on the momentum of the winner? |
|
By:
Didn't have an interest in the race but once again I ask two questions :
The jock got 5 days. What should he have done to avoid causing interference? If he had done what the Stewards have said he didn't what effect would that have had on the momentum of the winner? |
|
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps 20 Jul 23 16:16
50/50 for me...5 days ban for jock tho. roggrain 20 Jul 23 17:11 The jock got 5 days. wd rico..simply the best. |
|
By:
In The UK there seems to be no consistency in Horse racing, once the stewards get involved.
Football has gone tight buttocked with VAR, and most of the big comps in the world seem to have adopted it. But with Horse racing, in the U.S if a horse so much as kicks dust up, it gets demoted( well a bit of an exaggeration, but you know what I mean), but at least it seems semi consistent. here in the UK, things always seems a little more flaky, they really need to lock up some comprehensive, unwavering rules, for punters, owners and jockeys alike |
|
By:
you can make a lot of money on uk stewards if you know how its going to be called.
you can't in the us. that might explain the inconsistency .... |
|
By:
I thought there was a horse chucked last year for 'intimidation' wasnt there? so didnt even touch the other horse and was still chucked.
|
|
By:
we make a lot less on newmarket stewards since they removed the picture of Nimbus winning the 1949 Guineas with the listening device on the back of it ...
|
|
By:
JPSER 20 Jul 23 17:48
I thought there was a horse chucked last year for 'intimidation' wasnt there? so didnt even touch the other horse and was still chucked. 2 last week |
|
By:
Its a joke... make it up as go along ffs lol
|
|
By:
lots of inqs are likely to go eether way..
|