Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
https://snipboard.io/phHTzl.jpg
If only he would realize he can lay his own tips to get rich.
If only he would realize he can lay his own tips to get rich.
Show More
You dont half post some shyte Gays, WTF is that ?? just a load of numbers, meaning pheck all to anyone. !!
What part do you not understand you imbecile? This tipster has a -49% roi and 9% strike rate. Is that too hard to understand?
Backed 4 odds on-shots at average odds 1.37 and 3 of them lost, just incredible.
... And ? The point being ?? Why not keep it to yourself and just lay his selections. ??
Because you can't subscribe to him, this is his proofing period which didn't go as planned. I can't imagine someone with years of experience applying to become a tipster and these are his results. How could his systems show there's value on those horses? He must have confused backing with laying.
Similar conclusion maybe..
Conclusion for Gaze / Racing King on Betfan
If you ask me, Racing King is a fantastic example of a cautionary tale and why you can’t just blindly take the words of tipsters. Betfan have every right to advertise this the way that they have. After all, this is a service that has seen more than 800 points of profit in a year. But that is only a very narrow way of looking at it.
You see, when I look at Racing King, the things that I think simply aren’t in line with this idea of an immensely profitable tipster service. After all, this is a service that over the course of most of a year, saw about 70 points. Except, that is using the inflated 5 point stakes. If you were betting just 1 point per bet, that would be just 14 points. For a service that would have cost you some £405 in that period.
But for now, let’s stick to those advised stakes. So, over 9 months, Racing King made 70 points of profit. Then a single day in January lost 40 points. The numbers just don’t seem to add up in my opinion. There certainly isn’t any obvious way that I can reconcile them. All that I keep thinking is that you are paying a lot of money for a service that in real terms, has performed really rather moderately.
The real consideration with me here isn’t just the amount that you can (or can’t) make with Racing King (depending on how you want to look at it). It is the incredible amount of work that you have to put into it. I can’t ever recall looking at a tipster service that just takes so much commitment.
When you bring all of this together, I just find myself really questioning what the worth of Racing King is. It is incredibly expensive, the results aren’t bad but they are very hard won, and your investment is really quite significant. That might be alright for a service that boasts consistency (something Betfan claim for this, interestingly enough), but I don’t really see that. Where there was consistency, it was effectively one massive plateau.
Honestly, I don’t really think that I would look to recommend Racing King. I can definitely see why Betfan are keen to push this, but for me, I just don’t see why you’d really want to put your time into this. There are other services that if you scaled up their results, would do just as well. They’d also cost less, take up less time, and require a smaller betting bank. And I don’t really think I can be much clearer than that.
Conclusion for Gaze / Racing King on Betfan
If you ask me, Racing King is a fantastic example of a cautionary tale and why you can’t just blindly take the words of tipsters. Betfan have every right to advertise this the way that they have. After all, this is a service that has seen more than 800 points of profit in a year. But that is only a very narrow way of looking at it.
You see, when I look at Racing King, the things that I think simply aren’t in line with this idea of an immensely profitable tipster service. After all, this is a service that over the course of most of a year, saw about 70 points. Except, that is using the inflated 5 point stakes. If you were betting just 1 point per bet, that would be just 14 points. For a service that would have cost you some £405 in that period.
But for now, let’s stick to those advised stakes. So, over 9 months, Racing King made 70 points of profit. Then a single day in January lost 40 points. The numbers just don’t seem to add up in my opinion. There certainly isn’t any obvious way that I can reconcile them. All that I keep thinking is that you are paying a lot of money for a service that in real terms, has performed really rather moderately.
The real consideration with me here isn’t just the amount that you can (or can’t) make with Racing King (depending on how you want to look at it). It is the incredible amount of work that you have to put into it. I can’t ever recall looking at a tipster service that just takes so much commitment.
When you bring all of this together, I just find myself really questioning what the worth of Racing King is. It is incredibly expensive, the results aren’t bad but they are very hard won, and your investment is really quite significant. That might be alright for a service that boasts consistency (something Betfan claim for this, interestingly enough), but I don’t really see that. Where there was consistency, it was effectively one massive plateau.
Honestly, I don’t really think that I would look to recommend Racing King. I can definitely see why Betfan are keen to push this, but for me, I just don’t see why you’d really want to put your time into this. There are other services that if you scaled up their results, would do just as well. They’d also cost less, take up less time, and require a smaller betting bank. And I don’t really think I can be much clearer than that.
This is a bad service according to hayden: https://snipboard.io/2iIJ63.jpg
If Gaze wants to see the worst tipster I've ever seen, he just needs to look in a mirror.
https://snipboard.io/2MXOg7.jpg
This is me, Bet365 only, no BOG. Is this the worst tipping you've ever seen you imbecile?
This is me, Bet365 only, no BOG. Is this the worst tipping you've ever seen you imbecile?
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539