Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
11 Jul 23
22:51
Joined:
Date Joined:
27 Aug 07
39 of the last 300 threads (13%) on this forum were started by one poster.
Show More
.. Needs some lead in his ear, a bigger woolly vest would be hard to find.
Given the fact this place is a shadow of it's former self in terms of traffic and posting, I'd reluctantly have to answer 'no' - despite the fact that there's plenty garbage posted on here.
If we restricted the heavier posters, there would be barely anything left on here.
If we restricted the heavier posters, there would be barely anything left on here.
just posted on the footie forum, let's hope he is well received and finds a new home there.
Funny how everyone seems to have been annoyed for years, yet nobody has blocked me. Proppa clowns innit.
... Blocking you wouldnt stop you making umpteen pointless threads, out of curiosity why did you leave ( probably banned ) the Tipster site you were promoting. ?? What about all your poor subscribers hanging on your every selection. ??
Irrespective of limited, i think a few should be sectioned 
He got a bad review on the tipstrr site so reckon the subscription must have dipped , providing his subscribers can actually read of course.
Conclusion for Gaze/Racing King
If you ask me, Racing King is a fantastic example of a cautionary tale and why you can’t just blindly take the words of tipsters. Betfan have every right to advertise this the way that they have. After all, this is a service that has seen more than 800 points of profit in a year. But that is only a very narrow way of looking at it.
You see, when I look at Racing King, the things that I think simply aren’t in line with this idea of an immensely profitable tipster service. After all, this is a service that over the course of most of a year, saw about 70 points. Except, that is using the inflated 5 point stakes. If you were betting just 1 point per bet, that would be just 14 points. For a service that would have cost you some £405 in that period.
But for now, let’s stick to those advised stakes. So, over 9 months, Racing King made 70 points of profit. Then a single day in January lost 40 points. The numbers just don’t seem to add up in my opinion. There certainly isn’t any obvious way that I can reconcile them. All that I keep thinking is that you are paying a lot of money for a service that in real terms, has performed really rather moderately.
The real consideration with me here isn’t just the amount that you can (or can’t) make with Racing King (depending on how you want to look at it). It is the incredible amount of work that you have to put into it. I can’t ever recall looking at a tipster service that just takes so much commitment.
When you bring all of this together, I just find myself really questioning what the worth of Racing King is. It is incredibly expensive, the results aren’t bad but they are very hard won, and your investment is really quite significant. That might be alright for a service that boasts consistency (something Betfan claim for this, interestingly enough), but I don’t really see that. Where there was consistency, it was effectively one massive plateau.
Honestly, I don’t really think that I would look to recommend Racing King. I can definitely see why Betfan are keen to push this, but for me, I just don’t see why you’d really want to put your time into this. There are other services that if you scaled up their results, would do just as well. They’d also cost less, take up less time, and require a smaller betting bank. And I don’t really think I can be much clearer than that.
Conclusion for Gaze/Racing King
If you ask me, Racing King is a fantastic example of a cautionary tale and why you can’t just blindly take the words of tipsters. Betfan have every right to advertise this the way that they have. After all, this is a service that has seen more than 800 points of profit in a year. But that is only a very narrow way of looking at it.
You see, when I look at Racing King, the things that I think simply aren’t in line with this idea of an immensely profitable tipster service. After all, this is a service that over the course of most of a year, saw about 70 points. Except, that is using the inflated 5 point stakes. If you were betting just 1 point per bet, that would be just 14 points. For a service that would have cost you some £405 in that period.
But for now, let’s stick to those advised stakes. So, over 9 months, Racing King made 70 points of profit. Then a single day in January lost 40 points. The numbers just don’t seem to add up in my opinion. There certainly isn’t any obvious way that I can reconcile them. All that I keep thinking is that you are paying a lot of money for a service that in real terms, has performed really rather moderately.
The real consideration with me here isn’t just the amount that you can (or can’t) make with Racing King (depending on how you want to look at it). It is the incredible amount of work that you have to put into it. I can’t ever recall looking at a tipster service that just takes so much commitment.
When you bring all of this together, I just find myself really questioning what the worth of Racing King is. It is incredibly expensive, the results aren’t bad but they are very hard won, and your investment is really quite significant. That might be alright for a service that boasts consistency (something Betfan claim for this, interestingly enough), but I don’t really see that. Where there was consistency, it was effectively one massive plateau.
Honestly, I don’t really think that I would look to recommend Racing King. I can definitely see why Betfan are keen to push this, but for me, I just don’t see why you’d really want to put your time into this. There are other services that if you scaled up their results, would do just as well. They’d also cost less, take up less time, and require a smaller betting bank. And I don’t really think I can be much clearer than that.
At least MFordy/WindsorBoy/AscotLad/Veritas1/LaraBrown (and others I've forgotten) has stopped the Thankyou Sir posts - for the moment anyway.
yes hayden keep spamming the review of the profitable service I discontinued a year ago
Anyone who starts a thread on a subject that there's already a thread about should be restricted or suspended.
Gaze is the same person as another on this thread..
yew will cause rico mental health issues if he cant be on here daily.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539