|
By:
Not for me Tom , knew he was beaten then reason for snatch was thinking 2nd place was under threat for a split second so rode to the line after snatch.
All about interpretation though. |
|
By:
Only saw it once so your probably right, it didn't make any difference, it was just such a pronounced action that looked really odd.
|
|
By:
Second place never under threat. He was going faster than that one. Stopped riding too early. Made no difference whatsoever, but an odd one. Couldn't see any markers/lines which could have caused him to do it, and winner well in his line of sight, so no way could he have thought he was in front.
|
|
By:
My biggest bet of the day, placed at least, but thought was coming to win. Winner was nothing if not game though.
|
|
By:
Clifford Lee, the rider of KORKER (IRE), placed second, had appeared to stop riding shortly before the winning post, before being beaten ½ a length. After being interviewed and shown recordings of the incident, Lee’s explanation that the gelding had momentarily become unbalanced causing him to briefly stop riding for two strides, as a precautionary measure was noted. Being satisfied that KORKER (IRE) had achieved the best possible placing, no further action was taken.
|
|
By:
Common sense decision , who'd have thought.
|
|
By:
Yes, made no difference
![]() |
|
By:
Lee’s explanation that the gelding had momentarily become unbalanced causing him to briefly stop riding for two strides
garbage. up there with Rachels nonsense ... |
|
By:
Did a Canadian today for the first time in years, all races at York. Four winners and Korker
![]() |