|
By:
question for KPMG at next audit, or anyone interested in the integrity of the site.
who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 10.0 at 18:21 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 11.0 at 18:26 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 12.0 at 18:30 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 11.5 at 18:30 ? and is whoever behind those bets linked in anyway to the people running this place. |
|
By:
19:45 Gobi Sunset 6.2
|
|
By:
Absolute shat
|
|
By:
hulk23 • March 24, 2023 7:01 PM GMT
question for KPMG at next audit, or anyone interested in the integrity of the site. who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 10.0 at 18:21 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 11.0 at 18:26 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 12.0 at 18:30 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 11.5 at 18:30 ? and is whoever behind those bets linked in anyway to the people running this place. David Brent ![]() |
|
By:
![]() £108 Gobi 6.2 to 4.6 |
|
By:
1715 We Still Believe (IRE) 4.3 >> 3.45
![]() 1725 Pro Bono 6.4 >> 6.38 ![]() 1800 Roman Bull 6.2 >> 5.81 ![]() 1815 Bobby Joe Leg 7.0 >> 6.47 ![]() 1945 Gobi Sunset 6.2 >> 4.3 ![]() |
|
By:
lets change it around. how about a lay to back lads ??
2000 Macadams Rock 8.2 |
|
By:
8.4
|
|
By:
8.6
|
|
By:
£108 laying 8.4
that's strange. he's been backing all night ??? |
|
By:
Youre claiming 6.4 >> 6.38 as a success ? How fkin desperate are you ?
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
you're struggling now tiger. you can see what paddy's up to.
sorry to break it to you big man. |
|
By:
8.2 >> 8.4 SP. Fabulous stuff, well done again !
|
|
By:
you've just witnessed a horse move from 6.2 to 4.3, with £108 bets driving the price down, right after i said its moving in.
you got to try and deal with that. |
|
By:
watch Kraken Power here. went in at 8.2
|
|
By:
He picks a horse and highlights any move claiming all sorts of things. all around that horse in the market , they shorten and lengthen nothing said. So in the 5.25 nothing moved greater than his pro Bono.
Any number with an 8 in it becomes £108, the £108 only appears on the ond HD highlights. You have to remember though he originally said PP was copying his bets, after all the losers it appears that theory is out the window. |
|
By:
On the one
|
|
By:
Same old shat just different year .
|
|
By:
Lucky he has a day job
|
|
By:
Cause he ain't make jack with this green or red up
|
|
By:
i thought Hulk had had a dodgy curry reading the thread title...
|
|
By:
the £108 appeared one tick under a bet i placed at the start of a chase, with nothing else over a tenner looking to back anything else. its not any old thing with an 8. and the only person that knew that was my bet he was placing it in front of was paddy.
hth. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Is it ?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
6.2 gobi dealer
the image is there showing one of many £108 bets that started to appear as it made its merry old way down to 4.3 i didn't see any £108 bets before i posted. the same £108 player who was mad keen backing the one in Ireland at 10, 10.5, 12 and 11.5 the same one that's been backing everything i've stuck up on here tonight. except the one i said would go the other way and suddenly he's laying £108. think that's all above board ? good luck to you. |
|
By:
hulk is correct..the markets are 1million % state controlled...more so ir.
|
|
By:
U need help peddling this p1sh
For years. How much u made from this quarantee winning cistern |
|
By:
Will just have to disagree then
Good luck to you also. |
|
By:
Rico if you were Paddy and you were throwing £108 bets in the market pre race, would you pick hulk as the person to follow?
On all my years on here I've never heard anyone else mention £108 |
|
By:
this isn't about a winning system freddie, this is about site integrity. and it impacts everyone that comes on here and has done since the day pp took over the reins.
so if someone can run along and tell me who owns those 4 £108 bets that appeared looking to get on the one in Ireland, i'd be most grateful. house of cards ? |
|
By:
I've sat and watched the markets and hardly saw any £108 lumps, maybe I'm just watching the wrong markets.
|
|
By:
Hulk you are talking about £432 in a final market of what ??
|
|
By:
dealer. there's a chance more people have been selected, possibly a lot more. maybe it's just me that's noticed it. maybe you've been selected, who knows what their criteria is ?
|
|
By:
I find it strange if its that obvious, no one else has seen it.
|
|
By:
by the way, i agree with you and freddie. it looks like BS. and i always thought it was. until the day the £108 appeared in front of mine at the start of that race. hardly a bean for anything, i put money up at 11 and £108 appears wanting 10.5
that's when it goes from something doesn't feel right here, to that's absolute BS. and it has to be a bot. because a person wouldn't place that bet b'cos they'd know for sure i'd fkn notice it. which i most certainly did ![]() |
|
By:
Bookmakers have controlled the on course markets for years to affect SP's, no reason why they couldn't on an exchange but I can't have they are deliberately following you or anyone else's bets. Why would they need too?
I don't think your daft, although you do make me question my sanity !!! ![]() |
|
By:
and if its a bot. it has to belong to someone who can target individual accounts / trades / bets.
and the only person that has a bot with that capability, is the owner of the site. you don't know if a bet is mine, or Ricos, or tame the tigers. paddy does. you can't see both sides of a trade. paddy can. |
|
By:
can't have they are deliberately following you or anyone else's bets. Why would they need too?
there is a reason. once you've worked that out it'll maybe make a bit more sense. it's not all madness ![]() |
|
By:
everything is simply based on % and overides....every requested transaction is dealt with accordingly to suit the house for their best return..its savage.
|