1715 We Still Believe (IRE) 4.3 >> 3.45 1725 Pro Bono 6.4 >> 6.38 1745 King Carney 5.3 >> 6.4
can only presume someone knew what Mulrennan was up to. can't beat that kind of info.
back to lay, see if we get any joy. GL1715 We Still Believe (IRE) 4.3 >> 3.45 1725 Pro Bono 6.4 >> 6.38 1745 King Carney 5.3 >> 6.4 can only presume someone knew what Mulrennan was up to. can't beat that kind of info.
1715 We Still Believe (IRE) 4.3 >> 3.45 1725 Pro Bono 6.4 >> 6.38 1745 King Carney 5.3 >> 6.4 1800 Roman Bull 6.2 >> 5.81
back to lay, see if we get any joy. GL1715 We Still Believe (IRE) 4.3 >> 3.45 1725 Pro Bono 6.4 >> 6.38 1745 King Carney 5.3 >> 6.4 1800 Roman Bull 6.2 >> 5.81
1715 We Still Believe (IRE) 4.3 >> 3.45 1725 Pro Bono 6.4 >> 6.38 1745 King Carney 5.3 >> 6.4 1800 Roman Bull 6.2 >> 5.81 1815 Bobby Joe Leg 7.0 >> 6.47
back to lay, see if we get any joy. GL1715 We Still Believe (IRE) 4.3 >> 3.45 1725 Pro Bono 6.4 >> 6.38 1745 King Carney 5.3 >> 6.4 1800 Roman Bull 6.2 >> 5.81 1815 Bobby Joe Leg 7.0 >> 6.47
1715 We Still Believe (IRE) 4.3 >> 3.45 1725 Pro Bono 6.4 >> 6.38 1745 King Carney 5.3 >> 6.4 1800 Roman Bull 6.2 >> 5.81 1815 Bobby Joe Leg 7.0 >> 6.47 1830 Pulse Of Shanghai 11.5 >> 11.7
more £108's than you can shake a stick at late doors on Pulse of Shanghai. Unbelievable and presumably all from the same source.
1715 We Still Believe (IRE) 4.3 >> 3.45 1725 Pro Bono 6.4 >> 6.38 1745 King Carney 5.3 >> 6.4 1800 Roman Bull 6.2 >> 5.81 1815 Bobby Joe Leg 7.0 >> 6.47 1830 Pulse Of Shanghai 11.5 >> 11.7 more £108's than you can shake a stick at late doors on Puls
question for KPMG at next audit, or anyone interested in the integrity of the site.
who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 10.0 at 18:21 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 11.0 at 18:26 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 12.0 at 18:30 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 11.5 at 18:30 ?
and is whoever behind those bets linked in anyway to the people running this place.
question for KPMG at next audit, or anyone interested in the integrity of the site.who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 10.0 at 18:21 ?who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 11.0 at 18:26 ?who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 12.0 at 18:30 ?who want
hulk23 • March 24, 2023 7:01 PM GMT question for KPMG at next audit, or anyone interested in the integrity of the site.
who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 10.0 at 18:21 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 11.0 at 18:26 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 12.0 at 18:30 ? who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 11.5 at 18:30 ?
and is whoever behind those bets linked in anyway to the people running this place.
David Brent
hulk23 • March 24, 2023 7:01 PM GMTquestion for KPMG at next audit, or anyone interested in the integrity of the site.who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 10.0 at 18:21 ?who wanted £108 Pulse Of Shanghai at 11.0 at 18:26 ?who wanted £108 Pulse O
1715 We Still Believe (IRE) 4.3 >> 3.45 1725 Pro Bono 6.4 >> 6.38 1800 Roman Bull 6.2 >> 5.81 1815 Bobby Joe Leg 7.0 >> 6.47 1945 Gobi Sunset 6.2 >> 4.3
1715 We Still Believe (IRE) 4.3 >> 3.45 1725 Pro Bono 6.4 >> 6.38 1800 Roman Bull 6.2 >> 5.81 1815 Bobby Joe Leg 7.0 >> 6.47 1945 Gobi Sunset 6.2 >> 4.3
you've just witnessed a horse move from 6.2 to 4.3, with £108 bets driving the price down, right after i said its moving in.
you got to try and deal with that.
you've just witnessed a horse move from 6.2 to 4.3, with £108 bets driving the price down, right after i said its moving in. you got to try and deal with that.
He picks a horse and highlights any move claiming all sorts of things. all around that horse in the market , they shorten and lengthen nothing said. So in the 5.25 nothing moved greater than his pro Bono.
Any number with an 8 in it becomes £108, the £108 only appears on the ond HD highlights.
You have to remember though he originally said PP was copying his bets, after all the losers it appears that theory is out the window.
He picks a horse and highlights any move claiming all sorts of things. all around that horse in the market , they shorten and lengthen nothing said. So in the 5.25 nothing moved greater than his pro Bono. Any number with an 8 in it becomes £108, the
the £108 appeared one tick under a bet i placed at the start of a chase, with nothing else over a tenner looking to back anything else. its not any old thing with an 8. and the only person that knew that was my bet he was placing it in front of was paddy.
hth.
the £108 appeared one tick under a bet i placed at the start of a chase, with nothing else over a tenner looking to back anything else. its not any old thing with an 8. and the only person that knew that was my bet he was placing it in front of wa
6.2 gobi dealer the image is there showing one of many £108 bets that started to appear as it made its merry old way down to 4.3
i didn't see any £108 bets before i posted.
the same £108 player who was mad keen backing the one in Ireland at 10, 10.5, 12 and 11.5 the same one that's been backing everything i've stuck up on here tonight. except the one i said would go the other way and suddenly he's laying £108.
think that's all above board ? good luck to you.
6.2 gobi dealer the image is there showing one of many £108 bets that started to appear as it made its merry old way down to 4.3i didn't see any £108 bets before i posted. the same £108 player who was mad keen backing the one in Ireland at 10, 10
Rico if you were Paddy and you were throwing £108 bets in the market pre race, would you pick hulk as the person to follow?
On all my years on here I've never heard anyone else mention £108
Rico if you were Paddy and you were throwing £108 bets in the market pre race, would you pick hulk as the person to follow? On all my years on here I've never heard anyone else mention £108
this isn't about a winning system freddie, this is about site integrity. and it impacts everyone that comes on here and has done since the day pp took over the reins.
so if someone can run along and tell me who owns those 4 £108 bets that appeared looking to get on the one in Ireland, i'd be most grateful. house of cards ?
this isn't about a winning system freddie, this is about site integrity. and it impacts everyone that comes on here and has done since the day pp took over the reins. so if someone can run along and tell me who owns those 4 £108 bets that appeared
dealer. there's a chance more people have been selected, possibly a lot more. maybe it's just me that's noticed it. maybe you've been selected, who knows what their criteria is ?
dealer. there's a chance more people have been selected, possibly a lot more. maybe it's just me that's noticed it. maybe you've been selected, who knows what their criteria is ?
by the way, i agree with you and freddie. it looks like BS. and i always thought it was. until the day the £108 appeared in front of mine at the start of that race. hardly a bean for anything, i put money up at 11 and £108 appears wanting 10.5
that's when it goes from something doesn't feel right here, to that's absolute BS. and it has to be a bot. because a person wouldn't place that bet b'cos they'd know for sure i'd fkn notice it. which i most certainly did
by the way, i agree with you and freddie. it looks like BS. and i always thought it was. until the day the £108 appeared in front of mine at the start of that race. hardly a bean for anything, i put money up at 11 and £108 appears wanting 10.5t
Bookmakers have controlled the on course markets for years to affect SP's, no reason why they couldn't on an exchange but I can't have they are deliberately following you or anyone else's bets. Why would they need too?
I don't think your daft, although you do make me question my sanity !!!
Bookmakers have controlled the on course markets for years to affect SP's, no reason why they couldn't on an exchange but I can't have they are deliberately following you or anyone else's bets. Why would they need too? I don't think your daft, althou
and if its a bot. it has to belong to someone who can target individual accounts / trades / bets.
and the only person that has a bot with that capability, is the owner of the site.
you don't know if a bet is mine, or Ricos, or tame the tigers. paddy does.
you can't see both sides of a trade. paddy can.
and if its a bot. it has to belong to someone who can target individual accounts / trades / bets. and the only person that has a bot with that capability, is the owner of the site. you don't know if a bet is mine, or Ricos, or tame the tigers. pa
can't have they are deliberately following you or anyone else's bets. Why would they need too?
there is a reason. once you've worked that out it'll maybe make a bit more sense.
it's not all madness
can't have they are deliberately following you or anyone else's bets. Why would they need too?there is a reason. once you've worked that out it'll maybe make a bit more sense.it's not all madness
everything is simply based on % and overides....every requested transaction is dealt with accordingly to suit the house for their best return..its savage.
everything is simply based on % and overides....every requested transaction is dealt with accordingly to suit the house for their best return..its savage.
it's so far removed from what Andrew Black and Edward Wray had in mind it's not true. i'm still trying to work out who thought it was a good idea to allow a bookie to run an exchange.
i wouldn't trust them to run a bath.
it's so far removed from what Andrew Black and Edward Wray had in mind it's not true. i'm still trying to work out who thought it was a good idea to allow a bookie to run an exchange.i wouldn't trust them to run a bath.