From the BHA Stewards' Reports: The apparent improvement in form of the winner, LANGER DAN (IRE) compared with its previous run at Cheltenham on 1 January 2023, where the gelding finished eighth of nine runners beaten by 34 ¾ lengths, was considered. The representative of Dan Skelton explained that the gelding was suited by a return to Cheltenham where the gelding has run well previously, was noted; his explanation was noted and LANGER DAN (IRE) was routine tested. I think the representative needs to have rehearsed a more coherent explanation. Of course, " We laid it out for this race." is never the explanation.
Where's the logic in holding a Steward's in the first place?
"Timeform top-rated horse wins 26-runner handicap, having been in the top 5 in the betting" doesn't exactly scream "rancid" does it?
Where's the logic in holding a Steward's in the first place?"Timeform top-rated horse wins 26-runner handicap, having been in the top 5 in the betting" doesn't exactly scream "rancid" does it?