There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 54 comments are related to the topic:
Daytona Lady-not in picture!
Daytona Lady-not in picture!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 54
|
By:
playing devils advocate, would you rather have £500 on a horse at 13 that (potentially) rears up, veers and is last, or £1000 on at 7 on one that's completey relaxed in the stalls, breaks on terms and settles nicely in rear?
|
|
By:
Be interesting to see what Highest IR price Timeform give Lastofthecosmics, as on the graph BF high is about 240 but a tripes supper over 21.
|
|
By:
robbie was chucking pennies away..bit like a hoy out at a wedding.
|
|
By:
Be interesting to see what Highest IR price Timeform give Lastofthecosmics, as on the graph BF high is about 240 but a tripes supper over 21.
graph 240 timeform 42 ouch ....  |
|
By:
if stew's right tho , what's the point of 42?
It's like the 1.01 stats, how relevant are they when you're always £10k back in the queue? |
|
By:
so was 7.4 the high, or was there much higher that they don't report to Timeform. same as they've reported 42 as the high here but we have someone saying they saw 240.
highs the high isn't it, or maybe it isn't. |
|
By:
IPMAX Maximum price placed in-play (only bets of a payout of more than GBP100 included)
IPMIN Minimum price placed in-play (only bets of a payout of more than GBP100 included) So calculated by Purple method, rather than BF method of 100 matched. |
|
By:
So at least £2.39 was staked at 42.0
|
|
By:
so £1 matched at 95 isn't the high, £2.39 at 42 is the high.
except it isn't, 95 is. |
|
By:
I had a £20 bet the other day that won and I got 1000 max.
Trouble is I got £0.03p at 1000, £0.04p. at 980 , £0.10p at 880 etc, I think I ended up at 20 for £20 average. I don't really want to see historical data stating it hit 1000, for 99.9% of punters that's utter b0ll0x. |
|
By:
£1 matched at 95: £1 matched = 50p staked ; payout=£0.50+£47, which is less than 100, so not shown; even £1 staked at 95 is less than 100 and wouldn't show.
The high is =>2.39 staked at 42 |
|
By:
i must be old skool. matched at 42 and 85, the high's 85. because that's higher than 42.
unless you put an asterisk next to the 42 and explain at the bottom of the page which algorithms you've used to work out your own 'high' because you've personally deemed it's only official if it meets the some weird minimum payment criteria you've dreamt up. |
|
By:
do you really want to know that a horse hit 1000 for 1p. behave yourself hulk.
|
|
By:
could have 10p matched at every price from 44 to 990, resulting in a total payout of almost 5 grand. but because none of them constitute a payout of over £100 the in-running high is reported as 42.
|
|
By:
fair point but unlikely scenario in the current climate, there's bugger all traded at most prices.
|