|
By:
quick, panic, they are taking over the cuntry.
|
|
By:
Someone asked me that a few weeks ago Honcho. Released him at an allotment a few miles away, he kept coming back and landing on my shoulder
but took off after a week or two. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
I should've said heterosexual white males. If you are a gay, trans, or disabled white male you are a victim and have the right to be offended
|
|
By:
TBH I can't think when I would ever actually use the term 'Christian name', I'd always say 'first name'
![]() |
|
By:
I'm also trying to ponder another linguistic feature.
When did 'woke' take over from use of 'pc' I wonder....seems like it's used all the time now spouted around as a generalist term. |
|
By:
Wokies detest the term, that's possibly why more people who dislike them are using it.
Labellers don't like being labelled. |
|
By:
Those with the Christian name of Christian going to cause a bit of confusion.!
|
|
By:
saddo I can't stand pc campaign rubbish, but I also can't stand the dumb use of the word woke either - both sides are banal and stupid.
|
|
By:
In some countries, the "first" name is the surname as we would know it so more confusion. We are a country with a Christian heritage and most of us over 50 were baptised in a church when our name was made "Christian" Sadly like so much of our culture it is being removed by those whose agenda I can't fathom.
|
|
By:
First off people under 30 (40?) don't really use 'Christian' name - in fact when was the last time someone said it to you and not 'First' name - go on start a survey! 2nd when's the last time the vast maj of those working themselves into a lather went to church apart from a wedding, funeral, Christening - judging by the attendance figs a very long time ago? 3rd how many are Christened these days anyway - I'm not (50 v soon) so its meaningless to me and many many others. Language is always moving and this is no different No-one really cares either way and who cares what closeted US academics are doing ffs?
What next for the right wing to work themselves up into a lather, oh yeah 15 minute towns - please start off on that one as it's fecking hilarious? |
|
By:
I just dont think what some crazy acadamics and a few extreme freak shows complain about should be of issue to the rest of us. Just ignore them and carry on with your life. They arent relevant.
|
|
By:
Actually a few years ago 'woke' was a badge of honour as you are awake to the injustice in the world -personally I don't care that your gen pretty much don't give a damn about others (not only the 'woke' nonsese but the mark you have left and are leaving on history). Many still feel the same whatever the right wing do. It is fecking great watching you lot get so worked up about nothing so often - please keep it up fellers!
|
|
By:
I don't think I've ever asked someone what is your christian name......always your first name, as and when, so who gives a fk......on the other hand, it's just another example of those on a mission, who just keep chip chip chipping away at anything they deem to be "offensive" to someone.
![]() |
|
By:
Kathy Burke got it right about that daft americanism "woke"
|
|
By:
Dotchinite 17 Feb 23 20:02
I just dont think what some crazy acadamics and a few extreme freak shows complain about should be of issue to the rest of us. Just ignore them and carry on with your life. They arent relevant. ..................... Tell Sturgeon that wokie ideas aren't relevant. A wiggy c0ck chap being treated as a woman has possibly just cost her the leadership. |
|
By:
You have all missed the point it is the location.
|
|
By:
saddo. That just shows what happens if they overstep the mark and the vast majority bite back. Sturgeon enabled a man with a dress to go into a womens prison. These acadamic types merely talk cobblers that most of us ignore.
|
|
By:
And therein lies the problem. We have "ignored" 20-30 years of what was termed pc rubbish and that ignorance has simply allowed it to not only gain a foothold but become mainstream, so much so that it has almost become the agenda of the world.
|
|
By:
Spot on.
|
|
By:
ditto
|
|
By:
It’s just pandering to an overly entitled mentality that for the most part never had to put food on the table or keep a roof over their heads….they certainly never felt the hardship of having to fight in war.
Self indulgent petulance of the woke generation who think they have all the answers but have zero experience. |
|
By:
..and btw, it has nothing to do with the singular practise of arguing against the use of ‘Christian name’.
I was Christened, I had no say in it…a bizarre reality given neither parent is religious but that’s how it was. It wasn’t the last time I even entered a church but it almost was, and although I have no investment in the term itself I recognise it as being part of the function of communication. The whole endeavour of dismantling meaning is fraught with stupidity. Language is just a framework. Yet for all those who simply surrender to those who focus on such matters then you also have to justify all the other words that are being discredited. I don’t recall them all but there’s a lot of them, some include: Chief-disrespectful of native minorities in America Field- has connotations of cotton picking black slaves The expression, ‘no can do’- an imitation of Chinese immigrant use of English while being used to dynamite mountainous terrain building the railroads. Can you believe these are the arguments they are making? |
|
By:
Should racing really allow 'black type' races?
|
|
By:
Christian Atsu
RIP |
|
By:
irrelevant rubbish from poxy
nobody mentioned race-you brought it up the point is that academics seek offensive and find it where it doesnt exist, on behalf of others-hardly offensive to mention the word christian to anyone-offence exists only in their minds. they should be teaching not ideologising these same people brought in cultural appropriation safe spaces and content warnings that led to germaine greer and richard dawkins being no-platformed. and as predicted the term right-wing' was brought in by another twerp. academics come up with nonsense and pointing out thats its a waste of time and creates division where it doesnt exist is always dismissed as right wingers getting worked up about nothing. its only ever one-way. 'left wing' isnt used in a pejorative sense the same way. despite its overwhelming presence in academia. |