Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 65
By:
foxy top
When: 17 Feb 23 15:32
quick, panic, they are taking over the cuntry.
By:
saddo
When: 17 Feb 23 15:33
Someone asked me that a few weeks ago Honcho. Released him at an allotment a few miles away, he kept coming back and landing on my shoulder Cry but took off after a week or two.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 17 Feb 23 17:32

Feb 17, 2023 -- 2:57PM, saddo wrote:


Wokies consistently looking to find things that just might offend someone from somewhere, when they do we are allexpected to change. Not here, they can fro.


I'm afraid you are wrong saddo.  They are not interested in anything that might offend white males.  On the contrary, I think they quite enjoy doing so and think they're fair game.

By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 17 Feb 23 17:35
I should've said heterosexual white males.  If you are a gay, trans, or disabled white male you are a victim and have the right to be offended
By:
stu
When: 17 Feb 23 17:57
TBH I can't think when I would ever actually use the term 'Christian name', I'd always say 'first name' Plain
By:
stu
When: 17 Feb 23 18:06
I'm also trying to ponder another linguistic feature.

When did 'woke' take over from use of 'pc' I wonder....seems like it's used all the time now spouted around as a generalist term.
By:
saddo
When: 17 Feb 23 18:33
Wokies detest the term, that's possibly why more people who dislike them are using it.
Labellers don't like being labelled.
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 17 Feb 23 18:47
Those with the Christian name of Christian going to cause a bit of confusion.!
By:
stu
When: 17 Feb 23 18:57
saddo I can't stand pc campaign rubbish, but I also can't stand the dumb use of the word woke either - both sides are banal and stupid.
By:
sageform
When: 17 Feb 23 19:13
In some countries, the "first" name is the surname as we would know it so more confusion. We are a country with a Christian heritage and most of us over 50 were baptised in a church when our name was made "Christian" Sadly like so much of our culture it is being removed by those whose agenda I can't fathom.
By:
spyker
When: 17 Feb 23 19:58
First off people under 30 (40?) don't really use 'Christian' name - in fact when was the last time someone said it to you and not 'First' name - go on start a survey! 2nd when's the last time the vast maj of those working themselves into a lather went to church apart from a wedding, funeral, Christening - judging by the attendance figs a very long time ago? 3rd how many are Christened these days anyway - I'm not (50 v soon) so its  meaningless to me and many many others. Language is always moving and this is no different No-one really cares either way and who cares what closeted US academics are doing ffs?
What next for the right wing to work themselves up into a lather, oh yeah 15  minute towns - please start off on that one as it's fecking hilarious?
By:
Dotchinite
When: 17 Feb 23 20:02
I just dont think what some crazy acadamics and a few extreme freak shows complain about should be of issue to the rest of us. Just ignore them and carry on with your life. They arent relevant.
By:
spyker
When: 17 Feb 23 20:04
Actually a few years ago 'woke' was a badge of honour as you are awake to the injustice in the world -personally I don't care that your gen pretty much don't give a damn about others (not only the 'woke' nonsese but the mark you have left and are leaving on history). Many still feel the same whatever the right wing do. It is fecking great watching you lot get so worked up about nothing so often - please keep it up fellers!
By:
layemall
When: 17 Feb 23 20:16
I don't think I've ever asked someone what is your christian name......always your first name, as and when, so who gives a fk......on the other hand, it's just another example of those on a mission, who just keep chip chip chipping away at anything they deem to be "offensive" to someone. Sad
By:
sparrow
When: 17 Feb 23 20:24
Kathy Burke got it right about that daft americanism "woke"
By:
saddo
When: 17 Feb 23 20:24
Dotchinite 17 Feb 23 20:02 
I just dont think what some crazy acadamics and a few extreme freak shows complain about should be of issue to the rest of us. Just ignore them and carry on with your life. They arent relevant.

..................... 

Tell Sturgeon that wokie ideas aren't relevant. A wiggy c0ck chap being treated as a woman has possibly just cost her the leadership.
By:
liberator of the oppressed
When: 17 Feb 23 20:31
You have all missed the point it is the location.
By:
Dotchinite
When: 17 Feb 23 20:42
saddo. That just shows what happens if they overstep the mark and the vast majority bite back.  Sturgeon enabled a man with a dress to go into a womens prison. These acadamic types merely talk cobblers that most of us ignore.
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 17 Feb 23 21:06
And therein lies the problem.  We have "ignored" 20-30 years of what was termed pc rubbish and that ignorance has simply allowed it to not only gain a foothold but become mainstream, so much so that it has almost become the agenda of the world.
By:
saddo
When: 17 Feb 23 21:07
Spot on.
By:
layemall
When: 17 Feb 23 21:10
ditto
By:
dustybin
When: 18 Feb 23 06:36
It’s just pandering to an overly entitled mentality that for the most part never had to put food on the table or keep a roof over their heads….they certainly never felt the hardship of having to fight in war.

Self indulgent petulance of the woke generation who think they have all the answers but have zero experience.
By:
dustybin
When: 18 Feb 23 07:04
..and btw, it has nothing to do with the singular practise of arguing against the use of ‘Christian name’.

I was Christened, I had no say in it…a bizarre reality given neither parent is religious but that’s how it was.
It wasn’t the last time I even entered a church but it almost was, and although I have no investment in the term itself I recognise it as being part of the function of communication.
The whole endeavour of dismantling meaning is fraught with stupidity. Language is just a framework.

Yet for all those who simply surrender to those who focus on such matters then you also have to justify all the other words that are being discredited.
I don’t recall them all but there’s a lot of them, some include:

Chief-disrespectful of native minorities in America
Field- has connotations of cotton picking black slaves
The expression, ‘no can do’- an imitation of Chinese immigrant use of English while being used to dynamite mountainous terrain building the railroads.

Can you believe these are the arguments they are making?
By:
swiftynifty
When: 18 Feb 23 11:33
Should racing really allow 'black type' races?
By:
foxy top
When: 18 Feb 23 13:12
Christian Atsu

RIP
By:
mitolo
When: 19 Feb 23 13:26
irrelevant rubbish from poxy

nobody mentioned race-you brought it up

the point is that academics seek offensive and find it where it doesnt exist, on behalf of others-hardly offensive to mention the word christian to anyone-offence exists only in their minds. they should be teaching not ideologising

these same people brought in cultural appropriation safe spaces and content warnings that led to germaine greer and richard dawkins being no-platformed.

and as predicted the term right-wing' was brought in by another twerp. academics come up with nonsense and pointing out thats its a waste of time and creates division where it doesnt exist is always dismissed as right wingers getting worked up about nothing. its only ever one-way. 'left wing' isnt used in a pejorative sense the same way. despite its overwhelming presence in academia.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com