|
By:
lost.
|
|
By:
Close but no cigar.
|
|
By:
has anyone got the exact rule where it says 8 and under?
|
|
By:
8 lengths is 8 lengths, so not over. it's pretty clear I would say.
|
|
By:
I played it to NOT win by OVER 8 lengths. Settled as a LOSER. I thought it means by OVER 8 lengths... anyone got a clue?
|
|
By:
There has to be a market for exactly
|
|
By:
8 lengths is 8 lengths, so not over. it's pretty clear I would say.
nor is it under, like to see the exact wording. |
|
By:
Sportsbook or exchange ?
2 way or 3 way market ? Best post your actual bet OP with wording and odds to avoid any misunderstanding. Good luck ![]() |
|
By:
04-Feb-23
15:17:04 15:05 Leopardstown Yes - Galopin Des Champs To Win By Over 8 Lengths Betfair |
|
By:
If the market is will it win by over 8 lengths, then the answer is unequivocally NO.
|
|
By:
15:05 Leopardstown
No - Galopin Des Champs To Win By Over 8 Lengths Betfair Bet ID 1:295086538083## | Placed: 04-Feb-23 15:05:11 |
|
By:
Thanks for your thoughts on this bet guys
|
|
By:
Didn't see the market but posting your bet makes it clear as long as it was a two-way market.
As long as there's no exactly 8 lengths price quoted you're fine. Well done ![]() |
|
By:
Both cant be a loser as no market for exactly 8
|
|
By:
if done on the exchange, there is yes/no but you can back/lay both which can get confusing
![]() |
|
By:
Still saying it's a loser. They are looking into it
|
|
By:
Your bet should be a winner. It never won by more than 8 lengths. BF don't make things easy for themselves
|
|
By:
If you want to explode the chat-bot - tell them you think it's a dead-heat!
![]() |
|
By:
Haha I like the dead heat one
|
|
By:
bets a winner never won by more than 8 lengths
|
|
By:
15:05 Leopardstown
No - Galopin Des Champs To Win By Over 8 Lengths Betfair Bet ID 1:295086538083## | Placed: 04-Feb-23 15:05:11 nose >> 8L = winner over 8.5L loser. |
|
By:
Thanks rico
|
|
By:
Guess what! still not sorted!!!!!! Still on the case
|
|
By:
nowt suprises
|
|
By:
Laying over 8 lengths is a winner as it didn't win by OVER 8 lengths ! IMHO of course..
|
|
By:
To win by over 8l means 8l+ eg 8 1/4 (at least), if 1/4 is the next after 8l. A bet of up to 8l is a loser by my interpretation. However, I think the morons at betfair always take longer to come to a definitive on this to frustrate any winning bet merely to boost their profit unscrupulously, if necessary.
|
|
By:
It's a winning bet,can't see the problem or the reason for the faffing,it didn't break the 8 Lengths so pay the man.
|
|
By:
I did this bet on the exchange yesterday.
I backed it to win by OVER 8 lengths. Race was 3:05 - off 3:06 - finished 3:12 - settled as a loser at 3:17 (Knew it had lost - looked about 7 lengths in real time on TV) |
|
By:
Up until the dumbing down of Distance markets last year, there were often 3 options and you were never left in doubt,
which sector of distance you were betting in. It was clear cut. Betfair, after a thorough investigation according to them, punters wanted a basic YES/NO scenario. Saw about 50 posts that didn't like the new format and only one who did like it. |
|
By:
gallopin du champs to win by OVER 8L ...NO ! BETS A WINNER HE DINT WIN BY OVER 8 L
|
|
By:
The new look aligns closely with line markets available for other sports, and we hope that customers find them more accessible. Any feedback can be left in the thread below.
In fact in some (big) races with smaller fields you used to get FOUR option for distance betting. You could do quite well occasionally knowing how horses historically ran, jockey style and ground. Quite skillful and interesting occasionally. But now dumbed down to an either YES or NO. That's it. |
|
By:
Really cant see how you expect that to be a winner.
You backed it to WIN OVER 8 LENGTHS which is different to 8 lengths & OVER |
|
By:
He backed it not to win by over 8L^^^
|
|
By:
my apologies. misunderstood. Should be a winner then.
|
|
By:
,all day long. |
|
By:
inrunning has backed no and poppydog has backed yes and both are losers!!!!!
Betfair take the lot - good work if you can get it - what a bunch of see you next tuesdays they are |
|
By:
indeed.
|