Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Trident
01 Feb 23 09:23
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 May 07
| Topic/replies: 5,270 | Blogger: Trident's blog
Months away from being published! Dont hold on it even appearing this year. A shambles just like this current goverment.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 10
By:
formoftheace
When: 01 Feb 23 09:51
Breathing space
By:
dave1357
When: 01 Feb 23 09:55
The existing law allows the present drastic affordability restrictions, big fines for licencees etc, so the embarrasment for the government is that there really isn't much in terms of reforms that they can put forward despite their hot air.

They could make changes to protect consumers: ombudsman, requirement to ring fence funds, british based office, betting offers/bonuses to be available to all customers and not just used to target vulnerable. But tory governments have never been big on consumer protection.
By:
dustybin
When: 01 Feb 23 10:00
How can it possibly be going backwards?
It’s apparently been ready and available within a week a couple of times, when boris’ government collapsed it was ready, now it ain’t?

The reality is it’s the climate of never ably saying ‘no’ to minorities that has put the government in this pickle.
When MPs cry in HoP they are controlled by emotion and not fit to do the job objectively.
All this because of the arrogance of those who need help but won’t seek it and the GC who were caught not regulating properly and now tasked with even greater and much more contrived responsibilities.
By:
dave1357
When: 01 Feb 23 10:18
Protecting vulnerable gamblers is in the original legislation. Unless the government wants to introduce criminal offences around that area there are no law changes required.
By:
Trident
When: 01 Feb 23 10:33
Here is a question im wondering. "Who regulates the Goverment?" What I mean is like an "auditer" going into a bank for example to see all funds are legit. Sorry if this is a stupid question. Cheers
By:
dustybin
When: 01 Feb 23 10:35
You can take the government to the Supreme Court, some have and won.
By:
Trident
When: 01 Feb 23 10:44

Feb 1, 2023 -- 10:35AM, dustybin wrote:


You can take the government to the Supreme Court, some have and won.


Thank you, I wasn't aware of that. Cheers

By:
dave1357
When: 01 Feb 23 10:52
its called judicial review, but of course this government has now restricted that.
By:
formoftheace
When: 01 Feb 23 11:13
Always wondered the definition of vulnerable regarding luxury and hobbies in life…..

Pint or two…a dram or a nice glass of wine

A smoke at the pipe cig cigar

A punt at the weekend

Bingo…..a few quid on the golf,football,fishing and all other hobbies…all cost a few quid to join and clubs rods etc

Vulnerable…..ffs….
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 01 Feb 23 12:21
“The vulnerable” is a clever inverse-psyop term to leverage sympathy & group think compliance for rest of population.

^ Nailed it.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com