Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
ronnie rails
18 Jan 23 08:16
Joined:
Date Joined: 25 Oct 09
| Topic/replies: 4,468 | Blogger: ronnie rails's blog
If a punter is barred from a shop for not showing proof of funds and has a good few quid to pick up but can not pick the bet up till he has shown proof of funds , he will not produce proof of funds  so what happens to the cash.
Thank You.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 64
By:
DIFERENT GRAVY 12
When: 18 Jan 23 08:46
Pays your xmas bonus ronnie, same as all the other sleepersWink
By:
Regbutler
When: 18 Jan 23 09:11
I was told by an area manager for baldy shops the answer to the same question, as far as  his firm are concerned...
If the punter either refuses to comply, or his income stream he chooses to show them looks insufficient to support his staking...
Then, he will be banned from any future betting with them but still be given his outstanding winnings
By:
formoftheace
When: 18 Jan 23 09:23
Every punter in the UK should stop punting and going racing for one month…..

Listen to them squeal…
By:
ronnie rails
When: 18 Jan 23 09:26
Reg
with Corals the punter will not be paid till he provides proof of funds. a few quid as well.
By:
formoftheace
When: 18 Jan 23 09:27
Disgusting scenes
By:
Aviboyd
When: 18 Jan 23 09:38
Hello Ronnie, hope you are well?

Surely a threat of the small claims court with all correspondance copied to  paul.scully.mp@parliament.uk should do the trick for the punter.
By:
Regbutler
When: 18 Jan 23 09:39
Ronnie, the area manager told me that all the punter had to do was show a bank statement showing ins and outs totals for a few months
Now, if the customer deals a lot in cash, as I do, and the bank account sums look as though you are betting beyond your means, then they would stop you from future betting but pay you out what you are owed
Don't know what would happen if you just refused on principle to provide any bank info
By:
Movewiththetimes
When: 18 Jan 23 09:42
Ronnie- was it 4 fig payout what tiggered it? TIA.
By:
ronnie rails
When: 18 Jan 23 10:00
mwtt
as sting sang Message in a bottle.
By:
longbridge
When: 18 Jan 23 10:00
@aviboyd

The Small Claims Court per se no longer exists, but there is a process colloqualiy called that.

But IMO all the lawyer for the bookie would do is tell the court they are entirely happy to pay out once the Anti-Money Laundering conditions of their licence are met, and the punter would be sent him minus his fee with egg on his face.
By:
Movewiththetimes
When: 18 Jan 23 10:04
Cheers Ronnie, sad world we live in today Sad
By:
Regbutler
When: 18 Jan 23 10:09
Mwtt and Ronnie
I had a pick up of just over 8k back in December from a multiples bet on venetia Williams horses one Saturday
Got paid out part cash, rest on card in the baldy shop I use, within an hour of the last winner
No income proof asked for, but it later triggered the question I asked the area manager I wrote about above

Ronnie might be able to say whether Koral would have done any different?
By:
Movewiththetimes
When: 18 Jan 23 10:23
Nice bet Reg well done Cool Ronnie will know far better than me these days but I would say a decent drag will be ok with a regular customer. Think these days it's the new customer or problem customer what the computer will say no.
By:
DIFERENT GRAVY 12
When: 18 Jan 23 10:48
Surely if nothing is mentioned when placing the bet, there can legally be no issue when collecting any winnings? You cannot change the terms & conditions half way through the contract!

I place 90% of bets in shops(av £120 per day) and have never been asked for anything yet.
By:
longbridge
When: 18 Jan 23 10:53
No-one mentioned anything when you paid your salary to the bank, but if you wander in and ask for £10k in cash they will ask questions before they let you have it.
By:
DIFERENT GRAVY 12
When: 18 Jan 23 11:01
Yes but you will get it after answering a few security questions! The bookies are asking for certain things after the bet has been placed. It will all blow up in their faces at some point.
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 18 Jan 23 11:58
Agree 100% with DG, they should of asked for info BEFORE bet was struck, I would be straight to solicitor as it doesn't  even sound legal to me.
By:
longbridge
When: 18 Jan 23 12:38
I suspect the reason they don't askon deposit / before bet is struck is that they are not legally required to (as in they can satisfy their AML conditions by just checking withdrawals) and while it is not a legal requirement, no-one wants to be the first to demand it, knowing that it will deter new signups and send them to rivals without such checks.
By:
stu
When: 18 Jan 23 13:15
Should just add this to the long document of 'reasons not to bet with bookies' file.
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 18 Jan 23 13:44
Longbridge you are muddying  the water, we are talking about a shop transaction, as in the thread title.!!!!
By:
second again
When: 18 Jan 23 13:51
I can understand(though do'nt agree with) for maybe wanting info for example £1,000 on a 3/1 shot.But if you copped a small stakes multiple would they want to see your documents Ronnie?
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 18 Jan 23 14:21
so,was allowed to plaice the bet but not collect winnings?...just glad it wasnt me or shop no more.
By:
Hayden
When: 18 Jan 23 14:26
Give the slip to someone else to pick up , if it's £500 say coming back tell the shop he's bought the slip for £480 , so a score for his trouble.
By:
Hayden
When: 18 Jan 23 14:27
Give the slip to someone else to pick up , if it's £500 say coming back tell the shop he's bought the slip for £480 , so a score for his trouble.
By:
penzance
When: 18 Jan 23 14:30
Took the bet so should payout.Weren't worried about
the paperwork beforehand.
By:
sludge
When: 18 Jan 23 14:39
Spot on Rico .....my sentiments exactly . You have put your dosh on , and they better pay up poste haste when you come to collect . Nothing wrong with that .
By:
sludge
When: 18 Jan 23 14:41
Tbf i would be camping in the shop until i got the reddies.
By:
geoff m
When: 18 Jan 23 15:01
anyone been asked for proof of income for Betfair deposit or withdrawal??
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 18 Jan 23 15:01
By:
longbridge
When: 18 Jan 23 15:07
@GC

"Longbridge you are muddying  the water, we are talking about a shop transaction, as in the thread title.!!!!"

I do not see how the same does not apply to shops as to online - if you went to a Lads shop to place a 1p EW Goliath and they told you that you couldn't place it unless you did full background checks in case you won £1m, you would walk over the road to Hills and place the bet there, surely?
By:
formoftheace
When: 18 Jan 23 15:12
One word for this lot

Filth…..imv…
By:
stu
When: 18 Jan 23 15:18
Holding on to money, that belongs to another is borderline criminal IMO.

Though that's not exactly a new view I have of the bookies industry.
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 18 Jan 23 15:22
Longbridge, If a man walks in off the street and places a bet without being asked about providing any documents ( must happen a million times a day ) how the feck can you ask for documents after the bet has lapsed ???   I find it incredible, 95% of shop punters wont even had heard of Accountability checks and that this practice actually goes on is beyond me.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 18 Jan 23 15:30
Surely the time to request proof of funds is to plaice
the bet not as a device to prevent payout.

I can't produce proof of funds as Billy mountains
won't pay oot!
By:
s.kenbo
When: 18 Jan 23 15:37
Disgusting that Korals won’t pay out until after the event.

All shop staff know which of their regulars can and cannot afford to be betting. The latter are usually shouting at the screen and blaming the jockey!
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 18 Jan 23 15:45
surely the original steak cudnt have been enuff to not be able to proof funds origin?
By:
Hayden
When: 18 Jan 23 15:58
Be interesting if everyone having a losing shop bet today went back to the counter and produced proof that they shouldn't have been allowed to place the bet , so refunds all round.


Far fetched yes but i've always thought neither bookmakers nor punters can have it both ways.
By:
stu
When: 18 Jan 23 16:00
That's the problem Hayden, they do have it both ways, as shown by filth like this...
By:
formoftheace
When: 18 Jan 23 16:10
Stinking mess this industry….imv
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com