|
By:
dodgy photo and i had no interest in the race
|
|
By:
on twitter they saying the mirror/reverse image shows no 10 ahead
|
|
By:
[ This image is no longer available. ]
you can stop that as many times as you like and come to no other conclusion that the far sides won comfy. |
|
By:
[ This image is no longer available. ]
looks nothing like the rtv still. |
|
By:
[ This image is no longer available. ]
a yard before the line the far side is a foot in front..in non of these pics could this side have won..the angle of the camera from the grandstand cannot possibly be as where it looks. |
|
By:
1st picture above can make a case
|
|
By:
get oot while ya can as moos wud say
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5-c79LQ3aM |
|
By:
get oot while ya can as moos wud say
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5-c79LQ3aM |
|
By:
chavman • August 22, 2021 7:40 PM BST
on twitter they saying the mirror/reverse image shows no 10 ahead that's because "they" are thick |
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
just as an aside there are often distortions on "photos" are they are basically a continuous video of an area one pixel wide.
|
|
By:
Right I have just reviewed all the data again to be sure and here are the facts (and all races are freely available to review:)
. https://www.racingtv.com/videos/watch/horse_racing_replays/350695-sky-bet-sunday-series-newcomers-ebf-maiden-stakes-4 3:55 = Clear winner, showed Slow mo on line. (No betting due to result) 4:20 = Clear winner, showed Slow mo on line. (No betting due to result) [This was the second closest finish after the debacle in the 4:50 and the Slow Mo was 'paused'???? before they reached the line?? 4:50 = Contested winner, No Slow Mo (betting available as high as 1/100 in error) (The commentator called it 'wrong', the quiff called it 'wrong' and Franny the ex jock called it 'wrong' Franny said. 'It will be interesting to see the slow mo if we have access to it....' The quiff said, 'It wouldnt be Sandown without a tight photo...' 5:20 = Clear winner, showed Slow mo on line. (No betting due to result) 5:45 = Clear winner, showed Slow mo on line. (No betting due to result) 6:15 = Clear winner, showed Slow mo on line. (No betting due to result) 6:45 = Clear winner, showed Slow mo on line. (No betting due to result) So can somebody explain to me why they have no problems showing the Slow Mo when it isnt needed for anything, but for the one race it was required it scandalously wasnt shown, Fran implied there could be a possibility it wouldnt be shown, and the quiff observed that tight finishes are a constant issue at Sandown. Is it, at best incompetence that the Slow Mo isnt shown when required, or is it something more sinister and purposefully not shown (and the second closest finish was paused before the line...was somebody 'pre-empting' something there?) Who decides whether the Slow Mo is shown? |
|
By:
photo still up.
https://www.britishhorseracing.com/racing/results/fixture-results/result/#!/2021/1428/6472/0/ |
|
By:
that is def a different image, wesdaq, from the one you originally linked. The original showed the mirror with the slight discrepancy of the winner's nostril being on the line in the main, but passed the line in the mirror.
|
|
By:
A still shot two feet before the line does not count
|
|
By:
i missed race as worc was late
and with that any remaining credibility disappeared ... wac |
|
By:
worc 4:45 off time 16:51..winning time 5m 1 sec
sandown 4:50 off time 16:53 hulk once again confirms himself as the forum charlie cairoli.WADFC. |