give the BHA a bit of slack , they are busy trying to work out how racecourses can communicate with each other to stop race clashes and then they will deal with working out how to look at a photo and mirror image
come back in 2036 and it will be sorted
you lot are going way over the top here . give the BHA a bit of slack , they are busy trying to work out how racecourses can communicate with each other to stop race clashes and then they will deal with working out how to look at a photo and mirror i
Nevisons dead right on RTV - Its fookin diabolical - how can they try and rectify earlier mistake -ok lets call a dh (when its clearly not)
What a shambles -
Nevisons dead right on RTV - Its fookin diabolical - how can they try and rectify earlier mistake -ok lets call a dh (when its clearly not)What a shambles -
whatever how on earth could she get the photo so wrong in the first place even if the mirrors wrong etc. These photos are supposed to be doubly or even triple checked by others arent they?
whatever how on earth could she get the photo so wrong in the first place even if the mirrors wrong etc. These photos are supposed to be doubly or even triple checked by others arent they?
Photo-finish farce at Sandown as wrong winner is called before result is changed Sandown: Rio Ronaldo (near) was wrongly called the winner initially from Vibrant Chords (green) Sandown: Rio Ronaldo (near) was wrongly called the winner initially from Vibrant Chords (green) 1 of 1 By David Baxter UPDATED 6:38PM, JUL 6 2018
Confusion and chaos reigned following the first race at Sandown on Friday when judge Felix Wheeler called the wrong winner in a photo-finish to the 5f handicap.
Initially 13-2 chance Rio Ronaldo was called the winner by a nose, but upon closer examination 6-1 shot Vibrant Chords was instead judged to have passed the post first, with the result revised accordingly.
It is not the first time Wheeler has been at the centre of a photo-finish farce, with a race at Kempton in March subject to a reversal after he had called the photo incorrectly.
While bookmakers were left seething following two payouts, the BHA insisted the new failsafe system, introduced at the start of week to prevent a repeat of the Kempton episode, had worked.
Wheeler's call of Rio Ronaldo was reviewed by the stipendiary stewards on duty at Sandown and they queried his decision, which led to Vibrant Chords being called the winner.
This process was conducted before the weighed-in announcement was made, which is when a result becomes official.
Felix Wheeler was at the centre of the incorrect call Felix Wheeler was at the centre of the incorrect call Getty Images Commenting on the situation, BHA chief regulatory officer Brant Dunshea said: "Clearly the priority is to ensure the result is called correctly first time round. However, a new system was put in place this week which ensures a verification check by the stewards of any photo-finish call that takes place. That procedure has identified that the initial result was not called correctly and therefore the stewards asked the judge to clarify his decision.
Watch a replay of the race here
"This resulted in the decision being amended prior to the 'weighed-in' being announced. The new procedure has therefore worked as intended.
"Under the revised procedure judges will continue to announce the result as they first see it, but then a verification check will take place before the result is made official. The 'weighed-in' announcement is the point at which a result is confirmed and at which point, under the rules of betting, bookmakers are obliged to pay out on the result, and not before.
"We appreciate there is a period whereby those connected with the horse who placed second will have thought they had won. This is not ideal and why we must focus on getting the result correct first time.
"However, ensuring the check takes place before the weighed-in ensures that the correct result is in place ahead of the result being made official."
'It's hard for us to digest yet another error by a judge'
Some bookmakers on course had paid out before the weighed-in notice, and a representative for bookmaker Sid Hooper said: "It's comical and bookmakers need more protection."
Gary Selby, representing another Tattersalls bookmaker, added: "I've just paid out £1,300 on Rio Ronaldo and now have to pay out again on the winner [Vibrant Chords].
"Straight after they went past the post it was evens each of two [on the betting exchanges], then right at end they went 2-5 Vibrant Chords. No sooner had that happened then Rio Ronaldo was announced as the winner."
Betfair Sportsbook, Betway, Sky Bet, Betfred, Ladbrokes, Coral and Paddy Power were among firms who paid out on both results.
Paul Binfield, representing Paddy Power, said: "We love giving punters a bit of value, but a day after congratulating the BHA on their non-runner policy it’s hard for us to digest yet another error by a judge, which in the 21st century shouldn't be occurring and ultimately costs us money every time."
Simon Clare, on behalf of Ladbrokes and Coral, said: “The mistake made by the judge at Sandown today in calling the wrong horse the winner put us in a really awkward position, as that incorrect result was communicated across all channels to our Ladbrokes and Coral customers, including clearly those who backed Rio Ronaldo.
“Once the correction came through we took the decision to pay out on both results, which is clearly unattractive, but in the interests of keeping our customers happy we were effectively left with no choice given the situation we’d been presented with.”
Photo-finish farce at Sandown as wrong winner is called before result is changedSandown: Rio Ronaldo (near) was wrongly called the winner initially from Vibrant Chords (green)Sandown: Rio Ronaldo (near) was wrongly called the winner initially from Vi
imo the problem lies, not with the judges, but with the BHA. Reason - they should be transparent but are trying for damage limitation when things like this happen. The link which WP put up has within it this beauty "While a confidential report has been forwarded to the BHA headquarters in London for further investigation" (and the silence today seems to indicate that they will again try to keep everything in-house)
imo the problem lies, not with the judges, but with the BHA. Reason - they should be transparent but are trying for damage limitation when things like this happen. The link which WP put up has within it this beauty "While a confidential report has be
The BHA want to make the whole thing a clandestine mess.
But lets have another whip debate to bring more people in to racing,what about the people that are already here ?
LOOK AFTER YOUR EXISTING CUSTOMERS.
Outdated system.Hong Kong racing have it sussed.The BHA want to make the whole thing a clandestine mess.But lets have another whip debate to bring more people in to racing,what about the people that are already here ?LOOK AFTER YOUR EXISTING CUSTOME
I don't really understand why Sandown aren't liable in law ,for making easily avoidable errors that have a negative financial impact on people. They ,their staff, or their contractors have been negligent. Why try bothering to get things right ,when it costs you nothing when you get it wrong !
I don't really understand why Sandown aren't liable in law ,for making easily avoidable errors that have a negative financial impact on people.They ,their staff, or their contractors have been negligent. Why try bothering to get things right ,when it
So this geezer Felix Wheeler has called it wrong before? Could well be risking it for the biscuit (retirement fund), dead cert when you're the one calling it. And picked a good day for liquidity...
So this geezer Felix Wheeler has called it wrong before?Could well be risking it for the biscuit (retirement fund), dead cert when you're the one calling it. And picked a good day for liquidity...
Raceday Officials Assistant Steward: Josie Brown. Clerk of Scales: Graham Ford. Equine Welfare Integrity Officer: Carol Broodbank, John Bramhill, Kelly McSorley, Louise Sheridan, Peter Double. Judge: Jane Green. Raceday Assistant: Cody Watkins. Social Distancing Officer: Cathy OMeara. Starter: James Stenning, Sophia Upton. Steward: Richard Westropp, Sam Angell, Shaun Parker. Stewards’ Panel Chair: John Paxman. Veterinary Officer: Howard Robinson
This taken from the BHA site Raceday OfficialsAssistant Steward: Josie Brown.Clerk of Scales: Graham Ford.Equine Welfare Integrity Officer: Carol Broodbank, John Bramhill, Kelly McSorley, Louise Sheridan, Peter Double.Judge: Jane Green.Raceday Assist
One job to do,sort photo's out and call the reult..so see drags 2 lines across her screen to each nose of the 2 horses..quite clear who's won
yet still calls the wrong horse..if she had called it correctly the inventation of the wrong mirror placement would never have come to light.
wafdsc you are Jane
Judge: Jane Green.One job to do,sort photo's out and call the reult..so see drags 2 lines across her screen to each nose of the 2 horses..quite clear who's wonyet still calls the wrong horse..if she had called it correctly the inventation of the wron
nick luck asks the chief steward..'how far was the mirror misaligned by'?
he reply ..'a good nose'
ffs walofs..how would the mirror being moved an inch either way have effected the result?
nick luck asks the chief steward..'how far was the mirror misaligned by'?he reply ..'a good nose'ffs walofs..how would the mirror being moved an inch either way have effected the result?
Obviously they can't detect it from 300m away but they can realise that it's gone out of alignment between when they checked it just before the day's racing & the first race - I mean it happens all the time doesn't it?
Obviously they can't detect it from 300m away but they can realise that it's gone out of alignment between when they checked it just before the day's racing & the first race - I mean it happens all the time doesn't it?
reason why...because the detail with the tails is perfectly vertically aligned
everything including the lines drawn on the initial print is done perfectly, far side has clearly won
the problem is the result has been interpreted incorrectly, for whatever reason and the mirror "issue" has been made up to cover up the initial c0ck up
the mirror being misaligned is nonsensereason why...because the detail with the tails is perfectly vertically alignedeverything including the lines drawn on the initial print is done perfectly, far side has clearly wonthe problem is the result has be
doesnt make any sense they called a stewards seconds after result,already admitted the original result was a mistake what have they gained by inventing a conspiracy based on phto,s /stats everyone can check/investigate
doesnt make any sense they called a stewards seconds after result,already admitted the original result was a mistakewhat have they gained by inventing a conspiracy based on phto,s /stats everyone can check/investigate
Rico-Dangleflaps 03 Jul 21 19:36 Judge: Jane Green.
One job to do,sort photo's out and call the reult..so see drags 2 lines across her screen to each nose of the 2 horses..quite clear who's won
yet still calls the wrong horse..if she had called it correctly the inventation of the wrong mirror placement would never have come to light.
above
Rico-Dangleflaps 03 Jul 21 19:36 Judge: Jane Green.One job to do,sort photo's out and call the reult..so see drags 2 lines across her screen to each nose of the 2 horses..quite clear who's wonyet still calls the wrong horse..if she had called it cor
Sandown local B&Q and Wilkes - sold out of Spades ... bought by Sandown Stewards ....
No doubt paid for by the BHA Stipendiary Steward, who oversees the Photo Finish Operation ...
Expenses Chit going in on Monday.
Stewards - Still digging holes for themselves after racing.
Sandown local B&Q and Wilkes - sold out of Spades ... bought by Sandown Stewards ....No doubt paid for by the BHA Stipendiary Steward, who oversees the Photo Finish Operation ... Expenses Chit going in on Monday.Stewards - Still digging holes for t