We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
Professional as ever
![]() |
|
By:
1 job to do
|
|
By:
gubbing eitherway
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
You just cant get the staff these days people who can wave a flag and have good eyesight are hard to find
![]() |
|
By:
what happened to the double checking process?? who's the judge
![]() |
|
By:
Mr S. Wonder
![]() |
|
By:
Dead heat, you couldn't make this up if you tried.
|
|
By:
now called a dh..more punters absolutely raped to the hilt...a total and utter farce.
|
|
By:
dead heat to save face
![]() centralised stewards just got a lot closer |
|
By:
This is unfathomable
|
|
By:
The integrity of racing there for all to see ffs
|
|
By:
so now they make a second mistake to try to cover up the first
|
|
By:
I backed Hurricane Ivor and now lost half my winnings because of those stupid c**ts
|
|
By:
Judge is Jane Green
|
|
By:
Didn't this happen in jumps race at the course or the wrong winning post was used? I remember something like this happening at Sandown.
|
|
By:
Don't worry Hurricane will get it outright on appeal
![]() |
|
By:
you lot are going way over the top here .
give the BHA a bit of slack , they are busy trying to work out how racecourses can communicate with each other to stop race clashes and then they will deal with working out how to look at a photo and mirror image come back in 2036 and it will be sorted |
|
By:
btw , any one involved should be sacked ASAP
|
|
By:
cheating,unless they have a different photo
|
|
By:
The mirror is not working , FFS what next ?
|
|
By:
faulty equipment now what a joke racing is
|
|
By:
faulty mirror
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
martin dixon looks absolutely fuming
they now say the mirror is faulty , shouldn't this be tested before the start of each meeting at the very least ? |
|
By:
Nevisons dead right on RTV - Its fookin diabolical - how can they try and rectify earlier mistake -ok lets call a dh (when its clearly not)
What a shambles - ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
hubble
|
|
By:
Well I have to do the lottery later, backed Phoenix and been paid, waiting on e mail fom 365!!
|
|
By:
Come racing to be replaced with keep digging
|
|
By:
Did Lucky look in the Mirror and put it out of kilter.
|
|
By:
wow we have fooked up here wi that foto ,never mind call a dead heat everyones happy!
![]() |
|
By:
stewards
mirror out ITV pan in on mirror ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
now just blame racetech , what nonsense the mirrors out
|
|
By:
Well here's a nice mess you've gotten us into.
|
|
By:
Using the mirror line up their bit of sniff
|
|
By:
chief judge clearly backed wrong un in photo.
|
|
By:
If the mirror doesn't work how could they call a winner in the first place ?
|
|
By:
whatever how on earth could she get the photo so wrong in the first place even if the mirrors wrong etc. These photos are supposed to be doubly or even triple checked by others arent they?
|
|
By:
Too many questions Hushwing & too few answers. Best thing for the BHA to do is just to keep shtum & hang fire on the Stewards report
|
|
By:
Photo-finish farce at Sandown as wrong winner is called before result is changed
Sandown: Rio Ronaldo (near) was wrongly called the winner initially from Vibrant Chords (green) Sandown: Rio Ronaldo (near) was wrongly called the winner initially from Vibrant Chords (green) 1 of 1 By David Baxter UPDATED 6:38PM, JUL 6 2018 Confusion and chaos reigned following the first race at Sandown on Friday when judge Felix Wheeler called the wrong winner in a photo-finish to the 5f handicap. Initially 13-2 chance Rio Ronaldo was called the winner by a nose, but upon closer examination 6-1 shot Vibrant Chords was instead judged to have passed the post first, with the result revised accordingly. It is not the first time Wheeler has been at the centre of a photo-finish farce, with a race at Kempton in March subject to a reversal after he had called the photo incorrectly. While bookmakers were left seething following two payouts, the BHA insisted the new failsafe system, introduced at the start of week to prevent a repeat of the Kempton episode, had worked. Wheeler's call of Rio Ronaldo was reviewed by the stipendiary stewards on duty at Sandown and they queried his decision, which led to Vibrant Chords being called the winner. This process was conducted before the weighed-in announcement was made, which is when a result becomes official. Felix Wheeler was at the centre of the incorrect call Felix Wheeler was at the centre of the incorrect call Getty Images Commenting on the situation, BHA chief regulatory officer Brant Dunshea said: "Clearly the priority is to ensure the result is called correctly first time round. However, a new system was put in place this week which ensures a verification check by the stewards of any photo-finish call that takes place. That procedure has identified that the initial result was not called correctly and therefore the stewards asked the judge to clarify his decision. Watch a replay of the race here "This resulted in the decision being amended prior to the 'weighed-in' being announced. The new procedure has therefore worked as intended. "Under the revised procedure judges will continue to announce the result as they first see it, but then a verification check will take place before the result is made official. The 'weighed-in' announcement is the point at which a result is confirmed and at which point, under the rules of betting, bookmakers are obliged to pay out on the result, and not before. "We appreciate there is a period whereby those connected with the horse who placed second will have thought they had won. This is not ideal and why we must focus on getting the result correct first time. "However, ensuring the check takes place before the weighed-in ensures that the correct result is in place ahead of the result being made official." 'It's hard for us to digest yet another error by a judge' Some bookmakers on course had paid out before the weighed-in notice, and a representative for bookmaker Sid Hooper said: "It's comical and bookmakers need more protection." Gary Selby, representing another Tattersalls bookmaker, added: "I've just paid out £1,300 on Rio Ronaldo and now have to pay out again on the winner [Vibrant Chords]. "Straight after they went past the post it was evens each of two [on the betting exchanges], then right at end they went 2-5 Vibrant Chords. No sooner had that happened then Rio Ronaldo was announced as the winner." Betfair Sportsbook, Betway, Sky Bet, Betfred, Ladbrokes, Coral and Paddy Power were among firms who paid out on both results. Paul Binfield, representing Paddy Power, said: "We love giving punters a bit of value, but a day after congratulating the BHA on their non-runner policy it’s hard for us to digest yet another error by a judge, which in the 21st century shouldn't be occurring and ultimately costs us money every time." Simon Clare, on behalf of Ladbrokes and Coral, said: “The mistake made by the judge at Sandown today in calling the wrong horse the winner put us in a really awkward position, as that incorrect result was communicated across all channels to our Ladbrokes and Coral customers, including clearly those who backed Rio Ronaldo. “Once the correction came through we took the decision to pay out on both results, which is clearly unattractive, but in the interests of keeping our customers happy we were effectively left with no choice given the situation we’d been presented with.” |