|
By:
Thank you for posting this.
|
|
By:
Thanks Andriy, thoroughly enjoyed that.
|
|
By:
Cheers, good viewing
|
|
By:
Best jockey ever 20:06 in.
If only he was riding now, if only. |
|
By:
Thanks
|
|
By:
An interesting trip down memory lane. Re a thread on here in the last week : it was interesting to see the size of the crowd at the St.Leger in the days when the silver ring was still operating and the funfair in action.
|
|
By:
Thanks for that.
Love to know what he'd make of racing 40 years on. |
|
By:
Really enjoyed that. Why does Hamdan always look miserable after Wassl bolting up.
|
|
By:
Great watch thanks again loved his motto at the racecourse 'Keep your eyes open and your ears closed'
![]() |
|
By:
Brilliant,recognised many faces but never expected to see my Mum walk past him near the rails at Newmarket!
|
|
By:
Wow that's awesome
![]() |
|
By:
Yes parents never went abroad but went racing for their holidays and were members at Newmarket.
|
|
By:
Just finished watching this. Highly recommended.
|
|
By:
Thought he would have piled on Golden Fleece after Sangster told him what they thought of the horse.
|
|
By:
Guess he followed his motto open your eyes and close your ears seems to had paid over the years, hindsight greatest thing in horse racing.
|
|
By:
He was happy to back Wassl on Colonel Dick's recommendation though,remember Dick Warden well,he used to bet with Laddies and i was pals with the lads in the north and he was a fair lead,had his own horses with Peter Easterby,his colours are now the Habton farm colours.
|
|
By:
ribero1 09 Aug 20 21:16
Brilliant,recognised many faces but never expected to see my Mum walk past him near the rails at Newmarket! ----------- Love it ![]() |
|
By:
Maybe he thought Sangster was only hyping Golden Fleece's stallion value, a suspicion that still hangs around Ballydoyle and Coolmore. As Bull said in the film, Golden Fleece was unbeaten but had beaten nothing.
|
|
By:
Hindsight great in racing, truth on the day drifted from 2/1 to 11/4, where was Sangster's money that day?
|
|
By:
In his pocket
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Thanks onlooker,she had a good innings got to 94 and died 2 years ago,its on at 14.26,she looks as though she's on a bit of a mission to get her fiver on!
|
|
By:
Nothing to see here other than Ribero's mum. Great stuff, well spotted.
Other than that, man tells us he wins money backing horses, that's new. Man picks several in the same race sometimes he wins others not, that's new. Man tells us how much he won after the race, that is also new. Man backs a tip he has been give. Great! Man has no problem putting bets on, that's new. Man has gripes about the way racing is run and the results of stewards enquiries. Big surprise. He spent most of his time talking garbage. Nothing I saw made me think he was shrewd or wise or I would want to be anything like him. What I would have liked to see is him explaining how he set up Timeform. How he worked out the ratings and put the business together and built it up to what it was when he sold it and what gave him the money to bet. How one person can make so many mistakes but end up wealthy I suppose it could only happen in racing. He had an idea and ran with. Now that would be worth watching. Not, look at me I back winners, sometimes. |
|
By:
Excellent post, brigust1, you've articulated what I was thinking but thought I'd better not say!
|
|
By:
Tbf to Bull, it was a snapshot in time of an ageing gentleman, maybe under a bit of pressure to come up with bets for the camera, and not at all reflective of his 'golden' years.
If someone on here, for example, said he thought the 6 runner Jockey Club Cup was between the first 3 in the betting including the 5-4 fav, said he thought the Derby was between the first four in the betting and then proceeded to get it badly wrong financially as he effectively laid the fav who won comfortably, he'd be ridiculed, and that's before after-timing a £5K win. As Brigust1 says, there would have been more interest in hearing about Timeform. |
|
By:
The confusion over FPTP bets suggested Bull had not been a regular in the ring for years if not decades, but that film of Bull placing bets was demanded by the television company in return for Bull banging on about getting one over on the toffs who ran the Jockey Club.
And he was no in-running punter as we saw in Ardross's race. Come to think of it though, in-running is (or was) dominated by on-track punters relying on a time advantage to cover up their lack of race-reading skills. @brigust1 -- What I would have liked to see is him explaining how he set up Timeform. How he worked out the ratings and put the business together Phil Bull was the Time half of Timeform. The form ratings came from Dick Whitford who'd taken up private handicapping to while away his time onboard ships. It was mentioned in the film that Bull started by selling speed figures under the name William Temple (to avoid the wrath of his employers; he was a maths teacher). |
|
By:
As well as time (or speed) figures, Bull also started the annuals with their assessments of horses and essays on the leading performers.
|
|
By:
Used to see him in the ring a lot,he obviously had accounts with plenty of bookmakers,by the time of the film he will have no doubt amassed his fortune and maybe he did have an edge many years before but like everything that eventually may have been eroded. For me it was good to get a reminder of "the good old days" and he certainly mixed in the right company,the Charles st George party looked a nice jolly up,no surprise to see Charles Benson at the forefront there! Also spotted Lord Porchester/Caernarvon the queens racing manager following him in at the Hills joint.
|
|
By:
It was a good watch. Thanks for posting.
A slim John McCririck. Tommo asking Sangster stupid questions after Golden Fleece's win. Spotted Gerry Gallagher (Vincent's travelling head lad) with Golden Fleece |
|
By:
Haven't watched this video but recall it being aired at the time, my vague recollections of it were that it showed that his money wasn't made from his gambling but from his Timeform empire, didn't think he came over as shrewd at all, but do agree that the pressure of picking horses to back for the camera makes things harder. I remember John Goughs' documentary as well and he could hardly back a winner in front of the cameras either.
His documentary i felt was much more interesting for the average punter than filming this old codger with his elite cronies. Will watch later to see if my views have changed. |
|
By:
That's him rubbished then, so who's next Alec Bird as another right mug?
And don't forget those idiots at Druids Lodge either. |
|
By:
Howard Wright's biography of Phil Bull includes his betting accounts showing he did indeed make a fortune.
Trouble is, it too devotes a lot of space to Bull's struggles to drag the Jockey Club into the 20th Century which are very important but not necessarily entertaining. |
|
By:
Just an opinion of the documentary sparrow, but it's from a time long ago. A rich man with loads of contacts in stables living in a castle doesn't have much relevance to most keen horse race punters i wouldn't have thought. Incidentally 1982 was the only year i bought the Timeform Hurdlers and Chasers new, nearly 40 years ago, £82! Was interesting to read the essays on the top horses of the season but i can't say i found it much use in picking horses for the following season, £82 what would that equate to now about £500, no wonder he lived in a castle.![]() |
|
By:
You were robbed Stewart. Even the 85/86 edition was just under £50.
|
|
By:
£82 in 1982 = £291 average inflation 3.5% per year.
|
|
By:
My edition of Chasers and Hurdlers 1981/82 has an official price of £38 printed on page five.
|
|
By:
I'm not convinced. Didn't see him doing any studying or checking the form just wandering around smoking cigars. He never made any attempt to impress everyone which was the reason for the film. Unless that was him trying to impress. I don't believe anyone who won that kind of money wouldn't be getting bets on that easily unless he had another source.
I had accounts closed with Ladbrokes and the Tote in the early 70's and I was only betting in 10s and 20s and the very occasional ton. I rang up Lads one Saturday evening to back Fort Marcy in the Washington International they halved the bet and told me no more. As I said I would have been really interested in the machinations and setting up of Timeform The rest is just not interesting. |
|
By:
He was 72 in this documentary don't think I would be to bothered if I backed a winner or not with his money at his age, if it was 1952 be different story, still enjoyed it alot thanks for posting.
|
|
By:
My bad memory Anorak was £42 for 82/83 season, sorry but still dear enough, would imagine half to a weeks pick up pay to most people at the time, so probably about £250 now i'd guess. Then the racecards, the black books, the phone services, didn't need to bet at all.
|
|
By:
By the way Stewarts, your rich man in the castle was a miners son from Hemsworth in Yorkshire.
|