probably gauged by watching countries ahead of us right now mainly china , they opened cinemas then closed them again quickly recently
way i see it the situation we are in now stemmed from a few infections , so you need to assume it could again from a few infections so would imagine rate would need to be very low
Unless everyone starts getting tested or a phone app or something would declare who is safe now , that would be the big changer
they asked that tonite at press conf and medic couldn't really answer , also couldn't state a plan for exit
no expert but we got another month of this ahead i think
probably gauged by watching countries ahead of us right now mainly china , they opened cinemas then closed them again quickly recentlyway i see it the situation we are in now stemmed from a few infections , so you need to assume it could again from a
Unfortunately it seems to have gone past infections, and focused on fatalities. It does seem to have similarities to the Spanish flu of the First World War and that was worst the following year!
Unfortunately it seems to have gone past infections, and focused on fatalities.It does seem to have similarities to the Spanish flu of the First World War and that was worst the following year!
watched a docu about Spanish flu recently , horrific
one thing i will always remember is the female scientist
said you could line up a 100,000 of these germs and it wouldn't even stretch across your fingernail , made me think anyway
watched a docu about Spanish flu recently , horrific one thing i will always remember is the female scientist said you could line up a 100,000 of these germs and it wouldn't even stretch across your fingernail , made me think anyway
I think it will take longer than many of us think, specially in England.
I'm in Bavaria and was under a 2 week lock-down initially, but now it's been extended to April 19th as a minimum and expected to be extended again, this from an area with only 370 fatalities and far more testing than UK.
I cant see the guineas meeting in early May going ahead.
I think it will take longer than many of us think, specially in England. I'm in Bavaria and was under a 2 week lock-down initially, but now it's been extended to April 19th as a minimum and expected to be extended again, this from an area with only 3
Chinese walking around with masks on maintaining social distancing. They are 3 months on after intensive lockdown although they must be a poor model to follow for several reasons.
Italy and Spain a fair way away from normality.
Germany appear to have handle on it but not out of the woods.
Sweden doing their own thing but may be proven right as to their approach.
A vaccine against a virus that'll probably mutate into several strains at least 12 months away perhaps.
Just have to wait until Boris has squashed the 'sombrero' with his Hungry Hippo Hammer.
early July with a lowish 'active case' situation.
,,,,and then it all kicks off again in the Winter
3 months minimum at a guess.Chinese walking around with masks on maintaining social distancing. They are 3 months on after intensive lockdown although they must be a poor model to follow for several reasons.Italy and Spain a fair way away from normal
When they lift the ban it`s possible that people, living in isolation for so long, will fall into a false sense of safety and head out in their droves and the country will be hit by a second wave.
When they lift the ban it`s possible that people, living in isolation for so long, will fall into a false sense of safety and head out in their droves and the country will be hit by a second wave.
Apologies,didn't read the op properly,regarding numbers. Personally I don't believe the present numbers given by governments to be accurate. And I don't think we'll ever know. I hope there isn't many more.
Apologies,didn't read the op properly,regarding numbers.Personally I don't believe the present numbers given by governments to be accurate. And I don't think we'll ever know. I hope there isn't many more.
This goes on till it either dies out or a vaccine is found imo. BTW if a vaccine is found and 20000 people a day were given it,it would take 3000 days to vaccinate the population
This goes on till it either dies out or a vaccine is found imo. BTW if a vaccine is found and 20000 people a day were given it,it would take 3000 days to vaccinate the population
Personally I don't believe the present numbers given by governments to be accurate
That is indeed correct but of no fault of any government. I'ts literally impossible to tell. ie: In this country alone there are tens of thousands who have it....but don't know it yet.
Personally I don't believe the present numbers given by governments to be accurateThat is indeed correct but of no fault of any government. I'ts literally impossible to tell. ie: In this country alone there are tens of thousands who have it....but do
Reaching the peak is just the start, once you get to that point there then needs to be a further period of time with the lock down in place in order to let the virus starve itself today so to speak. If we all come out to play again too soon before it's fizzled out it will just breathe new life into it, because of this concern they will err on the side of caution.
Also, the notion of "partial" lifting of restrictions and such like is unworkable, you can't give mixed messages, it's all or nothing and it won't be soon IMO.
Reaching the peak is just the start, once you get to that point there then needs to be a further period of time with the lock down in place in order to let the virus starve itself today so to speak. If we all come out to play again too soon before it
The other thing to consider is that we are all on a lockdown together but we are not all at the same point together regarding infection, this thing is going to improve in some parts as it takes hold in other parts, if you start opening up some parts of the country it will just allow people to travel into and out of infected areas once again.
The other thing to consider is that we are all on a lockdown together but we are not all at the same point together regarding infection, this thing is going to improve in some parts as it takes hold in other parts, if you start opening up some parts
only someone who has access to the current situation would know when it's safe to go about your usual business, the rest is just speculation Willie and no-one can give you a definitive answer.
only someone who has access to the current situation would know when it's safe to go about your usual business, the rest is just speculation Willie and no-one can give you a definitive answer.
so,if the authorities got the number of people infected down to 50,then advised everyone to go back to normal,what potentially could be a likely scenario?
so,if the authorities got the number of people infected down to 50,then advised everyone to go back to normal,what potentially could be a likely scenario?
china were first to have it , and tbh they got themselves incredibly well organised
they are still getting new cases , i think its assumed either vaccine or everyone getting it is only way back to normal tho no one is going to admit that to public
if you thot you would be like this months would you be able to mentally handle it ? esp if your in city
the only reason we are allowed out a bit is they know its only way folk will accept a lot more
china were first to have it , and tbh they got themselves incredibly well organised they are still getting new cases , i think its assumed either vaccine or everyone getting it is only way back to normal tho no one is going to admit that to publicif
Exit strategy Also on the BBC's Andrew Marr show, Prof Neil Ferguson, of Imperial College London, said he could not predict when the lockdown would be lifted.
He said there was "no point" in releasing the lockdown "at a point where case numbers are still high and will resurge even faster than we have seen before."
Prof Ferguson added: "We want case numbers to get to a low point where we can start substituting other measures for the most intrusive and economically costly aspects of the current lockdown.
"Almost certainly those additional measures will involve massively ramped-up testing, going back to trying to identify contacts of cases and stopping chains of transmission.
"That can only feasibly be done when we have many fewer cases per day than we have at the moment."
that's the latest on exit , long way to go i think sadly
Exit strategyAlso on the BBC's Andrew Marr show, Prof Neil Ferguson, of Imperial College London, said he could not predict when the lockdown would be lifted.He said there was "no point" in releasing the lockdown "at a point where case numbers are sti
Willie Shafter. Date Joined: 15 Jul 04 Add contact | Send message 05 Apr 20 12:08Joined: 15 Jul 04 | Topic/replies: 35,631 | Blogger: Willie Shafter.'s blog coming from a tatey who still cant grasp what an av price is on a site he's used for yrs..cringe#.
Bearing in mind you had to ask the question in the first place proves your ignorance. btw your brain transplant has been cancelled. The hamster died.
Willie Shafter.Date Joined: 15 Jul 04Add contact | Send message05 Apr 20 12:08Joined: 15 Jul 04 | Topic/replies: 35,631 | Blogger: Willie Shafter.'s blogcoming from a tatey who still cant grasp what an av price is on a site he's used for yrs..cringe#
It's not down to us. How long are they prepared to let the lockdown go on. The economy will come 1st, so I have no idea of the numbers But it won't be 0, that's a fact.
It's not down to us. How long are they prepared to let the lockdown go on.The economy will come 1st, so I have no idea of the numbersBut it won't be 0, that's a fact.
This lock down is not about eradicating the virus. There will not be a point where there is zero infection and we can all get back to "normal". Even if we had a vaccine would take many years to get everyone immunised and the country would be bankrupt.
This lock down is not about eradicating the virus. There will not be a point where there is zero infection and we can all get back to "normal". Even if we had a vaccine would take many years to get everyone immunised and the country would be bankrupt
will need a vaccine , testing or app that increases safety by identifying those who had it
nothing will change until above is available en mass
you also have herd immunity as time passes, a long time under current circumstances , but who wants to go down that route right now ?
that's the question that will divide us eventually , whether loss of life is worth return to normal
it has to end sometime that's a given will need a vaccine , testing or app that increases safety by identifying those who had it nothing will change until above is available en mass you also have herd immunity as time passes, a long time under curren
I went around and got the Sunday paper and never realised until I read a piece about it that when I was 3 years old Asian Flu was claiming many lives, glad I wasn't aware of it at the time, my Mum and Dad must have been quite worried.
I went around and got the Sunday paper and never realised until I read a piece about it that when I was 3 years old Asian Flu was claiming many lives, glad I wasn't aware of it at the time, my Mum and Dad must have been quite worried.
The Scottish chief medic's position is totally untenable and should resign/be sacked immediately. Love it when people talk about a minimum of 50 new cases a day..that will occur sometime on the 2030s so normality will return sooner rather than later( a bit vague) but if you don't fancy your chances stay indoors for ever
The Scottish chief medic's position is totally untenable and should resign/be sacked immediately.Love it when people talk about a minimum of 50 new cases a day..that will occur sometime on the 2030s so normality will return sooner rather than later(
pandemics are likely to happen from time to time because of hygiene in certain countries isnt that strict, china started this pandemic tried to cover up the guy that blew the whistle then he dies and they are still covering up the numbers, china population 1.4 billion only 82k cases USA population 328 million , 311k cases even the uk has more deaths than china but only half the cases
pandemics are likely to happen from time to time because of hygiene in certain countries isnt that strict, china started this pandemic tried to cover up the guy that blew the whistle then he dies and they are still covering up the numbers, china popu
The government of China is a pathological liar. Not much come out of their mouthpiece is not sh1t. And now they are financially rewarded - what a perverse world we are living in?
The government of China is a pathological liar. Not much come out of their mouthpiece is not sh1t. And now they are financially rewarded - what a perverse world we are living in?
A..A lockdown is necessary to limit the spread of the virus and save lives, but it is not feasible or practical to prolong it for too long. A long lockdown will wipe out large swathes of the economy. There will be a negative impact both financially and mentally on too many people.
v
B..Some say the lockdown must not end until no-one can infect anyone again and thus ensure no-one dies.
i understand the implications of both..but,surely B takes priority.
A..A lockdown is necessary to limit the spread of the virus and save lives, but it isnot feasible or practical to prolong it for too long. A long lockdown will wipeout large swathes of the economy. There will be a negative impact bothfinancially and
And no one in world has an exit strategy yet , I read china opened cinemas recently but almost immediately closed them , no reason but obviously infection fears
attendance while open was very low seemingly , so possibly even after exit fear could linger for most anyway in uk
economy v human life tough one And no one in world has an exit strategy yet , I read china opened cinemas recently but almost immediately closed them , no reason but obviously infection fears attendance while open was very low seemingly , so possibly
if you believe B will be the answer than you really dont understand this mainly capitalistic world we live in
and Shafter it was only a couple days ago you were posting china as the source of the virus was not proven make your mind up
if you believe B will be the answerthan you really dont understand this mainly capitalistic world we live inand Shafter it was only a couple days ago you were posting china as the source of the virus was not provenmake your mind up
A..A lockdown is necessary to limit the spread of the virus and save lives, but it is not feasible or practical to prolong it for too long. A long lockdown will wipe out large swathes of the economy. There will be a negative impact both financially and mentally on too many people.
v
B..Some say the lockdown must not end until no-one can infect anyone again and thus ensure no-one dies.
i understand the implications of both..but,surely B takes priority.
Morally B, but I think A more likely to sway the decision, there is a point where the failure of the economy totally, deaths through isolation (old people, suicides etc) and civil unrest, mean that the economy has to be started again, certain other groups returning to work (manufacturing first I imagine) and an easing of lockdown measures (which may get more severe first).
A..A lockdown is necessary to limit the spread of the virus and save lives, but it isnot feasible or practical to prolong it for too long. A long lockdown will wipeout large swathes of the economy. There will be a negative impact bothfinancially and
wet markets a possibility but also reports virus started far earlier but logged as pneumonia , also possible bat to animal transfer originally
most of early cases had no connection to Wuhan market , as with everything related to virus we don't yet know everything its only been 3/4 months
isleham virus started in china , source isn't 100% proved wet markets a possibility but also reports virus started far earlier but logged as pneumonia , also possible bat to animal transfer originally most of early cases had no connection to Wuhan ma
Trump already thinking of getting the people back to work as he knows if they don't America might never recover, 95% recover I guess it's not long before country v dead wood will come in force.
Trump already thinking of getting the people back to work as he knows if they don't America might never recover, 95% recover I guess it's not long before country v dead wood will come in force.
trump just doing his bit to boost markets a little tbh
who would really risk the deaths of god knows how many , I think most now know this is a dangerous enemy and not one to ignore lightly
I can believe that trump just doing his bit to boost markets a little tbhwho would really risk the deaths of god knows how many , I think most now know this is a dangerous enemy and not one to ignore lightly
hello just because you hate trump you cant disagree with everything he says/does thats a totally subjective viewpoint..ofc not saying hes right but.. a broken clock will be right twice a day
hellojust because you hate trump you cant disagree with everything he says/doesthats a totally subjective viewpoint..ofc not saying hes right but..a broken clock will be right twice a day
and a few days ago i mentioned australia were managing to stage horse racing and was told forcibly perhaps they were not taking the virus seriously. well looking at their graph of new cases,at the moment,they look to have got their approach very right
and a few days ago i mentioned australia were managing to stage horse racingand was told forcibly perhaps they were not taking the virus seriously.well looking at their graph of new cases,at the moment,they look to have got their approach very right
I don't hate trump mate i just think he is dangerous and led by vanity also
For the leader of America to encourage severe xenophobia is plain crazy , not what you want or expect from a leader
whatever your view of virus origins you just cant label an entire nation for the actions of a few , theres enough hate in the world already
America is messed up enough without alienating a further 4 million people
I don't hate trump mate i just think he is dangerous and led by vanity alsoFor the leader of America to encourage severe xenophobia is plain crazy , not what you want or expect from a leader whatever your view of virus origins you just cant label an
isleham 06 Apr 20 10:14 if you believe B will be the answer than you really dont understand this mainly capitalistic world we live in
and Shafter it was only a couple days ago you were posting china as the source of the virus was not proven make your mind up
show me where i posted this?
isleham 06 Apr 20 10:14 if you believe B will be the answerthan you really dont understand this mainly capitalistic world we live inand Shafter it was only a couple days ago you were posting china as the source of the virus was not provenmake your m
DOUBLED 06 Apr 20 10:19 B..Some say the lockdown must not end until no-one can infect anyone again and thus ensure no-one dies.
comedy gold
you make plenty criticism dave..whats your solution?
DOUBLED 06 Apr 20 10:19 B..Some say the lockdown must not end until no-one can infect anyone again andthus ensure no-one dies.comedy goldyou make plenty criticism dave..whats your solution?
population density could play a major part in the australian profile in that it has a poulation of just under half of hours with a land mass over 30 times bigger and as such it is much easier to contain the spread.
uk average 710 people per sq m aus average 3 people per sq m
population density could play a major part in the australian profile in that it has a poulation of just under half of hours with a land mass over 30 times bigger and as such it is much easier to contain the spread.uk average 710 people per sq maus av
sorry didnt know we couldnt go off piste on a thread (shafter laying down the forum rules now!!!) and in answer to your aboriginal question my experience would be if alcohol is a deterrant to the virus they will be ok allegedly
sorry didnt know we couldnt go off piste on a thread (shafter laying down the forum rules now!!!)and in answer to your aboriginal question my experience would be if alcohol is a deterrant to thevirus they will be ok allegedly
Maybe most animals can catch it. Tigers lions Apes certainly. Domestic cats you would think so. At the moment they are saying we can't catch it from them. Sounds like BS to me.
Maybe most animals can catch it. Tigers lions Apes certainly. Domestic cats you would think so. At the moment they are saying we can't catch it from them. Sounds like BS to me.
isleham 06 Apr 20 10:14 if you believe B will be the answer than you really dont understand this mainly capitalistic world we live in and Shafter it was only a couple days ago you were posting china as the source of the virus was not proven make your mind up show me where i posted this?
isleham 06 Apr 20 10:14 if you believe B will be the answerthan you really dont understand this mainly capitalistic world we live inand Shafter it was only a couple days ago you were posting china as the source of the virus was not provenmake your mi
i see you post on average 6000 times a month and at the moment you are probably x10 that number so sorry im not spending my days searching through the topics but you know you did or very close to that effect
i see you post on average 6000 times a month and at the moment you are probably x10 that number so sorry im not spending my dayssearching through the topics but you know you did or very close tothat effect
A few of these countries had mass gatherings or completely stupid ideas that has warped the figures
Germany - Smurf invasion (you read that right) Spain - women’s right March Italy - had a hug a Chinese person day (you also read that right) England - Cheltenham, Football, Tube
So let’s see how the lock down goes...infections could start coming down just as fast as they went up.
A few of these countries had mass gatherings or completely stupid ideas that has warped the figuresGermany - Smurf invasion (you read that right)Spain - women’s right March Italy - had a hug a Chinese person day (you also read that right)England -