Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 132 comments are related to the topic:
stewards chelmsford

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 132
By:
wisewords
When: 26 Sep 19 18:25
when does the official explanation get published?
By:
Wesdag
When: 26 Sep 19 18:28
shortly...
By:
postmannick
When: 26 Sep 19 18:29
wisewords- that should be interesting because they must have seen something we did"dt
By:
jamesdean
When: 26 Sep 19 18:30
typo dusty

her train ticket!*
By:
HappyHibby
When: 26 Sep 19 18:31
will be interesting to see if Beckie Smith gets a ban....

considering what Luke Morris did was 10 times worse and he got away with a caution (somehow)....
By:
HappyHibby
When: 26 Sep 19 18:52
taken them an hour so far to update the stewards report...

must be some nice dinner and drinks on the go in Essex tonight...

either that or someone has been on the phone telling them they best get their story straight coz there will be an appeal coming their way...
By:
Wesdag
When: 26 Sep 19 18:52
An enquiry was held to consider the placings in this race following interference in the final furlong when the
winner, WILD FLOWER (IRE), ridden by Miss Becky Smith, interfered with ISLAY MIST, placed second,
ridden by Miss Suzannah Stevens. Being a 7lb amateur rider, Miss Stevenson was accompanied in the
enquiry by her employer. The Stewards considered that the interference had improved WILD FLOWER
(IRE)’s placing as ISLAY MIST had been intimidated off its intended line over a sustained period and, on
the run to the line, the filly had rallied to be beaten by diminishing neck. The placings were revised as
follows: First, ISLAY MIST, second, WILD FLOWER (IRE). Miss Smith was suspended for 3 days for
allowing her mount to drift right-handed for a number of strides and without correction, on dates to be
notified to her.
By:
Wesdag
When: 26 Sep 19 18:53
intimidated my arse
By:
Wesdag
When: 26 Sep 19 18:53
just being eyeballed is enough to get chucked now - pathetic
By:
HappyHibby
When: 26 Sep 19 18:54
becky smith gets 3 days...

luke morris gets none...

dear god.
By:
elise
When: 26 Sep 19 18:55
see in there the 7lb claimer bit is bollx, two experienced riders do the same thing it usually stands yet they should know better, 2 kids do it the stewards hit her with a ban, jobsworths
By:
elise
When: 26 Sep 19 18:56
sry hibby posting same time, same thing
By:
HappyHibby
When: 26 Sep 19 18:57
your point is 100% correct elise so no problem...
By:
elise
When: 26 Sep 19 18:58
Stewards: Sam Angell (Chief Steward), Simon Marriage (Stewards' Panel Chair), Sally Lyons (Steward), Kate Smith (Assistant Steward), Jennifer Dewhurst (Raceday Assistant)
By:
elise
When: 26 Sep 19 18:59
im sure one or two of those were recently involved in another feck up of a dq which ended in a reversal at appeal
By:
roggrain
When: 26 Sep 19 18:59
Since when does 'intimidation' warrant a disqualification? I don't believe the word exists in the rules.
By:
Willie Shafter.
When: 26 Sep 19 19:03
be beaten by diminishing neck.

they should all be sacked for that comment alone.
By:
tomhunt
When: 26 Sep 19 19:04
rallied to be beat a diminishing neck......what are they watching, was always holding the other, in fact kept straight would have won further
By:
Wesdag
When: 26 Sep 19 19:05
really is a ridiculous explanation & opens a massive can of worms

anytime a horse doesn't run straight when upsides, they can now just say it was "intimidated" & amend
By:
HappyHibby
When: 26 Sep 19 19:07
i'm sure the  Info@britishhorseracing.com inbox will be full in the morning...
By:
elise
When: 26 Sep 19 19:08
the word intimidation does appear in the rules in the context of what's happened, but the interpretation and common sense angle of applying the law and the lack of consistency are a huge missing
By:
Wesdag
When: 26 Sep 19 19:08
https://twitter.com/BHAStewards/status/1177265073666043904

you leave a comment here as well
By:
Wesdag
When: 26 Sep 19 19:09
* can
By:
elise
When: 26 Sep 19 19:11
what they've done is taken the view that because it came off a line and she didn't act to correct that they have to chuck it, but the "has it improved it's placing" seems to have gone a bit skewy
By:
dave1357
When: 26 Sep 19 19:12

Sep 26, 2019 -- 7:07PM, HappyHibby wrote:


i'm sure the  Info@britishhorseracing.com inbox will be full in the morning...


and every mail will be deleted without a response

By:
HappyHibby
When: 26 Sep 19 19:14
you are probably correct there dave...

we're just the mugs who play a major part in keeping the sport going don't forget...
By:
dave1357
When: 26 Sep 19 19:16
they don't even acknowledge that far less forget it.  Same as the UKGC, no interest at all in the people who pay for it all.
By:
HappyHibby
When: 26 Sep 19 19:21
public relations and customer service in general is dispicable from most organisations and companies if you ask me dave...

been saying it for years...
By:
howard
When: 27 Sep 19 11:43
Just seen my  recording of all this.  One of the worst decisions I have seen in Britain in 40 years watching racing. Must appeal. Willie correct fpp holding the runner up comfy.
By:
dave1357
When: 27 Sep 19 13:01
and the irony is that the present rules were brought it because it was thought that stricter rules were annoying punters.  In just one week we have had an clear winner disqualified and a horse that should have been awarded the race left in second.
By:
tips
When: 27 Sep 19 13:44
didnt have a bet but can not believe that was amended I never bet on stewards and after that I will never bet on one
By:
commander
When: 27 Sep 19 14:10
"the filly had rallied to be beaten by diminishing neck" BIZARRE.... Looked like the winner was pulling away to win by a neck to me?
By:
howard
When: 27 Sep 19 14:25
Someone should name a horse Diminishing Neck and run it plenty at Chelmsford.
By:
Willie Shafter.
When: 27 Sep 19 15:09
yet to see anyone who thought the winner was in danger...

apart from the 4 incompetent people who were employed to oversee these things.
By:
commander
When: 27 Sep 19 15:42
If that was at Sandown, I'm not sure they would have even held an enquiry!
By:
howard
When: 27 Sep 19 15:57
All RUK pundit  said was jock had given fpp a great ride.....then she gets a ban.
By:
jamesdean
When: 28 Sep 19 18:32
That one was worse between the two godolphin horses than the one that got flung other night and they aint even called one
By:
Keefter
When: 28 Sep 19 18:41
^^^^^^^^^Agreed
By:
HappyHibby
When: 28 Sep 19 19:14
double agreed...
By:
Deltâ
When: 08 Oct 19 21:46
how did the appeal go?
Page 3 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com