There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 129 comments are related to the topic:
stewards sandown
stewards sandown
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 129
|
By:
result stands
|
|
By:
initially I thought fptp goes, but i'm not now convinced
|
|
By:
really?
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Must assume the pundits got the rules completely wrong.
|
|
By:
is that true, it stands?
|
|
By:
How can that possibly stand?
|
|
By:
Yes - I think that was the right call by the rules - but don't know why they take SO long
|
|
By:
if it stands my only thought was distance from line
|
|
By:
BHA website shooda. In any event the stewards are only to DQ if they think the horse causing the interference 'improved it's placing'
So the culprit gets the benefit of the doubt. Absurd! |
|
By:
|
|
By:
result stands
 |
|
By:
ta steve
|
|
By:
I'm not complaining, i'd already given up on £1600 there
A shocking decision imo, even tho i'm grateful |
|
By:
I think that was the correct decision.
|
|
By:
the stews got a nice holiday out that 1 no wonder theres a waiting list to got on the roster
|
|
By:
well I really must say I have seen it all now. I looked at the race as if I had backed the FPTP. When the otherranged up I would have expected to lose. Little doubt in my mind the second was getting up.
|
|
By:
enpassant 25 Jul 19 15:19
Must assume the pundits got the rules completely wrong. mellish had doubts whether 2nd would have won. |
|
By:
well you called it early slippy so wd
|
|
By:
Well that is quite extraordinary. Well done the pundits who got it right but no other country would have upheld the result and I suspect that most UK stewards would have changed it as well.
|
|
By:
Didn't see the stewards enquiry but did the 2nd not bump the winner into the rail 1st which caused it to lose balance and swerve off the rail.
Or was I seeing things |
|
By:
JUstice for Just Hubert.
My faith in stewards of making the right decision has risen exponentially. |
|
By:
I mean; it really is a farce trying to double guess these stewards.
|
|
By:
It was a jink not an usual occurance, I think its the correct result personally.
|
|
By:
w muir, other horse bumped us.
|
|
By:
muir is lying through his back teeth here
there is no bump from the 2nd to the winner |
|
By:
MillionaireMaker 25 Jul 19 15:21
Didn't see the stewards enquiry but did the 2nd not bump the winner into the rail 1st which caused it to lose balance and swerve off the rail. Or was I seeing things |
|
By:
2nd did come over a few strides before but not sure that would be classed as interference lol
|
|
By:
I agree 100% Sageform!
|
|
By:
Joined: 10 Oct 02 | Topic/replies: 813 | Blogger: shoodacoodadidnt's blog
Yes - I think that was the right call by the rules - but don't know why they take SO long Rate reply:  your pocket rules??there is no doubt its the wrong decision based on 'their' rules |
|
By:
stewards decision hasnt suprised me..i along with plenty wasnt convince 2nd would have deffo won.
|
|
By:
Anywhere else in the world placing reversed. Our rules almost encourage win at all cost interference..One day someone is getting to get seriously hurt or worse...
|
|
By:
Shafty you wrote it would get disq yfdc
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
a jockey cant help it if a horse veers alladin.
|
|
By:
a jockey cant help it if a horse veers aladin.
|
|
By:
Don't blame the stewards, blame the BHA for such ridiculous interference rules.
|
|
By:
The commentators or the stewards..................have not got a scooby about the rules ? Either way, one side is incompetentt
|
|
By:
on this occasion no blame to marquand imo...horse should have been placed 2nd though
|
|
By:
eat more spinnach
|