There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
25 Jul 19
15:00
Joined:
Date Joined:
04 Jun 09
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 129
|
By:
chuck it out!
|
|
By:
Nah, that result will stand.
|
|
By:
2/5 bucky
 |
|
By:
places reversed imo
|
|
By:
Second must get it.
|
|
By:
can lay 1.4 slippy..post ya huge lay please
|
|
By:
only thing the winner has in favour as it was only 50 yards from the line
think it will go but wdnt be taking 2's on |
|
By:
I don't think the 2nd was ever going past.
|
|
By:
If the rules say 'could' have won then surely they have to toss that out
he clearly may have won that if the leader had not crashed into him |
|
By:
wd?
|
|
By:
Market says it will go but I wouldn't be with the odds on personally.
|
|
By:
wow - same old debate on the rules - I can't believe the betting - I shouldn't think it will be chucked - hilariously I have £5 rfc - and get £18 more if they reverse it! :D
|
|
By:
I think the winner would have won anyway but more than likely the second will get it
|
|
By:
im not convinced 2nd would have deffo won..but as winner started moving left it made it look like 2nd was joining it...the hd on looks terrible so for that reason it gets disq..but nowt would suprised me.
|
|
By:
I'd rather be a layer of the 6 than a backer tbh. But I have a horrible track record betting in these markets.
|
|
By:
agree with Steve Mellish reckon Just Hubert would have won but they will chuck it out as it looked dramatic.
|
|
By:
stoords will decide after they're fully matched..
 |
|
By:
i,ve backed the 2 so it will probably get chucked out
|
|
By:
whos had a wager
|
|
By:
SlippyBlue 25 Jul 19 15:04
Market says it will go but I wouldn't be with the odds on personally. so you lay it.? |
|
By:
Odds should be closer than 1.4 3.3 whatever happens
|
|
By:
she was just about to draw her whip and coax him home. no doubt in my mind he'd have won and when there's interference to that scale its makes it very easy for stewards to throw it out.
and she deserves it ,great ride by nicola |
|
By:
These stewards have previous, don't they?
|
|
By:
Hubi closing the gap
 |
|
By:
I think the second would have won . The momentum was with the second and I felt sure it was getting up. Just to add, I layed the fav, so no interest other than the outcome of the inquiry!
|
|
By:
you are all supposed to be gamblers..if you cannot judge value then quit the game..if odds are wrong iyo then act on it.
|
|
By:
They firsts say 'if it could have won' is stated in the rules then say they think the fptp will keep it as the 2nd 'may not' have got up ! If the stewards look at it like that why have rules at all !
|
|
By:
Agreed Hushwing.
|
|
By:
she didn't get chance to ride a finish
 |
|
By:
Backed Hubert and layed it off @ 1.1, so quite happy either way.
|
|
By:
It looks so bad if the second doesn't get it, FPP may well have held on but it was a coin flip. Benefit should be given to impeded horse
|
|
By:
Do the rules say "benefit should be given to impeded horse"?
|
|
By:
i concur entirely uber..
|
|
By:
Anyone know how you can find the rules?
|
|
By:
shoodacoodadidnt 25 Jul 19 15:15
Do the rules say "benefit should be given to impeded horse"? has the winner causer interference? yes has it cost the 2nd the race? debatable. |
|
By:
BHA Website
|
|
By:
usually favour the impeded horse in tight calls but think they've got that right..his edging right ff made it look like he was closing faster than was the case...dont think he would have got there in time
|
|
By:
Debatable is enough for the 2nd to egt it if the rules were stated correctly
|
|
By:
https://www.britishhorseracing.com/regulation/rules-guides/
|