|
By:
LOL Penz I was hooked
|
|
By:
Dylan Dawes
Charges brought against the former BBC Wales producer Children and Animals involved on this occasion Released on conditional bail and Judge Richard Kember set the trial date for April 7 in Cardiff. he did not enter a plea You want people to pay towards this IMP Its never ending |
|
By:
I sugest you Tune into channel 5 for a bit of BBC history you must have missed , Kicks off at 10.30 Savile Harris Glittle and Itsa knock out Stu
Edwards not on there but 5 are running a drama staring tuesday About Huw paying towards these types is not for me , but each to their own |
|
By:
agree wi nanny, foo kem
|
|
By:
If the prisons are full consider housing them in poly-tunnels or barracks which the inmates will have to pay for themselves. I honestly believe some prisons ought to be charged eg benefit and financial fraudsters and traffic offenders.
Next consider charging the repeat and self-inflicted users of the NHS eg smokers / heavy drinkers (cancer-related cases); fatties (non-hereditary but greedy and convenient food abusers). UK Plc and taxpayers cannot afford to continue to fund these categories of health and food abusers. |
|
By:
What the BBC gravy-trainers / individuals are doing / have done in the past should not be used to define the legitimacy and legality of possessing a TV Licence. There are so many householders I've come across without a TV Licence. Some are benefit recipients.
Road Tax - Vehicles (for using the roads). VAT - Goods Import / Custom & Excise - Vehicles Income / Corporation Tax - Individual / Company As such, why exclude a TV Licence tax for users? Pay-per view eg SKY / NOW / Disney / etc. Pay to use it, simple! |