|
By:
I just don't trust DM in races like this on the follow up Tiger in Hcp hurdles, his record is poor especially when there are other winners in the race.Can't argue with the form though of that penultimate race it does look pretty good.
Henry oliver is strong in these mares hcp hurdles and he is also particularly strong using claimers on his hcp hurdlers, when you pair the two together... Claimers on in mares hcp hurdles races he is 7-12, clearly a type he's placed well. GL with Dons, I'm not playing. |
|
By:
Nice write up and I agree.
Horses aren’t animals but this should go close. I’m backing 2 places only from taking the viewpoint theoretically I’d do well to lose my money as I can’t find 2 things that will beat it. |
|
By:
Bit of a Michael Owen comment that. For it to lose something would have to beat it, basically what I’m saying is, it will be 1st or 2nd. No more fence sitting
|
|
By:
I do think Its All A Lark should improve for the better jockey alone, let alone anything else!
|
|
By:
oliver could get a double up in the first two if the money for them is right.
|
|
By:
Another Theatre for me
|
|
By:
good money the oliver horse, all aboard i reckon ..
|
|
By:
Good stats stride
|
|
By:
Henry Oliver upholds my comments!
shame race lost peters cousin though |
|
By:
he's different gravy in these races.
|
|
By:
hard held, 5/1 in running though - would've been lovely ..
|
|
By:
Place money will do.
|
|
By:
SE good post
|
|
By:
after deductions place on 2nd paying next to nothing
|
|
By:
46.3%.
|
|
By:
4/9 minus commission minus your win bet
|
|
By:
The op backed at 2.2 then place the r/f will take it down to around 1.64
|
|
By:
SP was 1.45 and he just said place bet paid 46.3% ie 1.463
so circa 4/9 minus commission |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Sorry, I was referring to the op TT who place backed it at 2.2
|
|
By:
Forum royalty!!..thanks platinum for all those fantastic "opposable favourites"
![]() |
|
By:
Nice write up and I agree.
|