Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 69 comments are related to the topic:
What would you change to improve British racing?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 69
By:
foxy
When: 27 Sep 18 09:23
thats correct wasnot and it seems to have worked very well,market rasen family enclosure is very good in fact its better than the main enclosures.
By:
Gordon63
When: 27 Sep 18 09:35
less racing
much less AW racing
significant bans for stopping rides
By:
sparrow
When: 27 Sep 18 10:00
Gordon63    27 Sep 18 09:35 
less racing
much less AW racing
significant bans for stopping rides



Some of us like AW racing but don't you worry about anyone else.
By:
differentdrum
When: 27 Sep 18 10:13
These are individual views, nothing to do with worrying about what anyone else thinks.
By:
Johnny_Mustang
When: 27 Sep 18 10:16
Morning to you too Foxy, hope all's well.
By:
foxy
When: 27 Sep 18 10:25
i am well jm looking forward to the winter and spring with all the great racing that comes with it,hope things are good with you.
By:
sparrow
When: 27 Sep 18 10:38
differentdrum    27 Sep 18 10:13 
These are individual views, nothing to do with worrying about what anyone else thinks.






Yes that seems a good idea to improve British racing.
By:
foxy
When: 27 Sep 18 10:46
good morning sparrow

i thought todays card at newmarket was the poorest i have seen on the opening day of the cambridgeshire meeting.
By:
sparrow
When: 27 Sep 18 10:51
Good morning foxy. To be honest it's not a meeting I take a lot of notice of these days but I didn't think it was too bad. That Newmarket Whip race is getting popular now with 5 runners today as it used to be a match most years I remember.
By:
Gordon63
When: 27 Sep 18 11:07
sparrow - I was unaware I wasn't allowed a different opinion to yours!

AW racing was introduced to cover for turf cancellations, particularly winter saturdays, this laudable idea has now morphed into Saturday 1st September - 3 AW meetings, surely overkill.

I'm 100% in favour of the race programme at Chelmsford (and to a lesser extent Kempton & Newcastle) where they're putting up really great prize money for horses which prefer or at least act on the surface and where they can race into the evenings in autumn/spring, but whilst day after day of tedium at the other tracks might be doing you a favour, the reality is it's diluting the pool of horses for turf racing, hence lower field sizes, less betting, lower levy, less competition etc etc.  I also believe a knock on effect of an increased quantity of lower level racing (and most AW races are below Class 3) has played into the hands of those who are prepared to bend/break the rules of racing for their own gain.

But I don't have to take any interest in the Kempton 5.40, each to their own
By:
sparrow
When: 27 Sep 18 12:05
gordon- My point is that we all have likes and dislikes but we should not be arguing for getting rid of meetings we personally don't like. As you say each to their own but just remember that your opinion is not necessarily shared by others and racing needs all the friends it can get. And since you mention field sizes you surely know that Class 6 races attract the biggest fields overall.
By:
differentdrum
When: 27 Sep 18 13:04
No opinion is going to be shared by everyone. How does effectively lauding mediocrity equate to the idea that 'racing needs all the friends it can get'? Surely part of racing is improving the breed. How is that achieved by putting on loads of rubbish races for rubbish horses? It just encourages more and more rubbish.

It is pretty obvious that in any sport far more people will be interested in the best that sport has to offer, not the worst. You can't sell the sport off the back of a mass of Class 6's. The fact that they might fill just confirms how many poor horses are in training. Too many.
By:
pablo-fanque
When: 27 Sep 18 13:49
every time a jockey is being interviewed and they say "listen" , they should lose their share of prize money , or riding fee . trainers should pay £500 per "listen" , AOB can afford it so he's alright
By:
sparrow
When: 27 Sep 18 13:54
The sport will just be for the super rich if you have your way differentdrum. Owners spend tens of thousands keeping this "rubbish" as you call it in training and many people in work. Your thoughts on racing are simply a recipe for the demise of the industry.
By:
sageform
When: 27 Sep 18 14:25
"rubbish" horses are the ones that never manage to get within 50 lengths of the winner. They are usually retired after a few runs anyway. I would make some more changes to the entry conditions and declaration system to reduce the variability in field size. Too many races are restricted to a small % of the horse population and don't attract enough entries.
By:
jackboo
When: 27 Sep 18 15:01
2 year old can not race over 7 fulongs / and 3 year old not over 1/5 fullongs .and 4 year old 2miles and more
By:
EastLower Gooner
When: 27 Sep 18 15:02
Only British bred horses can enter our classics #Brexit
By:
Oldgit1
When: 27 Sep 18 17:40
Get more people going with much reduced admission and sponsored free days.
I always quote some old Guys on the bus going to Suffolk Downs, It's cheaper than going to a movie and you might win a few bucks. They also had a lot of free days there.
Meeting we went to in Norway was free admission but the beer was expensive :-)
By:
Gordon63
When: 27 Sep 18 17:41
sparrow - i'm proud partial owner of a 69 rated 2yo and a 60 rated 3yo, hopefully not rubbish but if there was any indication that they would be more suited for AW racing then I'd try to sell my share as personally for me that's a one way street I don't want to go down...trainers like scott dixon and others who succeed on AW have my admiration for winning regularly with 45-60 horses and for sure they have their place but the 'pyramid' structure has far too many class 5 and class 6 races and there are possibly too many horses being bred/trained
By:
differentdrum
When: 27 Sep 18 18:04
I think you need to be relatively rich to own a horse full stop.

One of my reasons for preferring jumps to flat is the chance it offers the smaller owner to occasionally dine at the top table. You are not going to get the equivalent of Norton's Coin, Lady Rebecca, Earth Sunmmit etc. winning a Derby. Unfortunately, the fairytale stories are diminishing with the increasing dominance of the likes of Gigginstown, Ricci, JP and co.
By:
brassneck
When: 27 Sep 18 18:24
if every course in the country got a new clock at the starting post it would helpLaugh
By:
cardenden
When: 27 Sep 18 18:46
all racing should be free to watch,,after all its not only trainers and owners that keep this game on its feet,, its the punters.
By:
Oldgit1
When: 27 Sep 18 19:26
Without punters racing might well go back to it origins with aristocrats and rich owners running their horses against each others. Although it would make betting tame for the majority of us an off course Tote monopoly would put a massive amount of money into racing and to the State. With on course bookies only it might get punters off their backsides and on to the course.
By:
sageform
When: 27 Sep 18 20:05
Everyone in racing is interconnected. Owners need breeders, racecourse managers, horse transporters, trainers and their staff and if they want some prize money, punters. There is no doubt that the current product is easier to access from home than on a racecourse or in a betting shop. Racecourse entry should be cheaper but it can only happen if courses get a higher percentage of betting turnover. Towcester made a brave attempt at free racing but it has now gone bust.
By:
Charlton2005
When: 27 Sep 18 20:15
get rid of bookmakers
By:
Charlton2005
When: 27 Sep 18 20:22
three biggest racing markets in the world (HK, France, USA) all tote monopolies

you do the math
By:
Oldgit1
When: 28 Sep 18 16:42
France has plenty of Tote/Pari Mutual outlets as do Australia and Hong Kong.
Despite the number of times I've been to America I did not see much off course betting and the New York OTB even went out of business in 2010. I suppose most of it now is online.
By:
kevo
When: 28 Sep 18 18:04
Tend to agree with everything in differentdrum post 26 Sep 18 23:27.
By:
sewter lives again
When: 28 Sep 18 18:29
i agree as well kevo

also i know it wont happen but..

...draw a line in the sand and say to owners, trainers and jockeys this is how it's going to be in the future regarding

the way horses are ridden
By:
roggrain
When: 29 Sep 18 11:08
The American race tracks all offer betting on other tracks, and open for that purpose on 'dark' days, Oldgit.


A substantial percentage of the pools come from off track betting in this way.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com