any stewards ireland?

in major trouble imo

lose 90 or win 700

good shout tf

what was winning distance, a nose?

not sure but was tight obvs yes mate

no way will they change that ,, lump on STANDS

is that u bob cooper?

2nd caught winners back end and pushed it onto a new line

1.01     £931         £5,047        
1.02     £500         £9,848        
1.03             £7,663        
1.04     £422         £23,360        
1.05     £4         £21,973        
1.06     £4         £25,614        
1.07     £4         £17,230        
1.08     £8         £11,506        
1.09     £8         £2,919        
1.10     £7         £987        
1.11     £6         £1,231

win dist seems to be a secret

NOSE

they put the photo up on atr

1.01 boys in a lot of trouble here ...

hope its shafter

sh head winning dist

sh hd

thanks jd

11/2 to keep the races

nervy times

wouldnt be going in at that price on the 2nd after this long

wd TF - i hope you have a secured a nice green book

not decided yet

Mental didnt even know there was a stewards or that there would be and now it looks like its getting amended

chucked out, no brainer ...

300 or 450 wicklow thanks. prefer go

good spot by braodsword

wd good to get a couple of results like that, with the end of the evening action.

WD TheFear i wasnt expecting this result either


Horse Racing > List 11th Sep : 2m Hcap Hrd    Showing 1 - 5 of 5 Selections
Selection    Odds    Stake(£)    Bid type    Placed    Profit/loss(£)
Gold Seal    28.63    3.00    Back    11-Sep-18 15:44    82.88
Gold Seal    *    1.38    62.24    Lay         -23.64
Kuiper Belt    6.40    2.00    Back    11-Sep-18 15:38    -2.00
Kuiper Belt    6.40    2.00    Lay    11-Sep-18 15:38    2.00
Randalls Ur Poet    *    111.79    10.14    Lay         10.14
*Average odds: On  Off    Back subtotal:    80.88
Lay subtotal:    -11.50
Market subtotal:    69.38
Commission @ 4.4%:    3.05
Net Market Total:    66.33

yeah lost yesterday so pleased thks wicklow

money goes to money RL ;)

hulk23    11 Sep 18 16:05 
chucked out, no brainer ...

and odd against,wd,must have copped the lot.

very odd reverse in my book

opens up a big can of worms moving forwards, you will have horses bumping 3 out beaten a nose and getting it in the stewards room, some may think it should of been kicked out, however i don't

i think jocks lucky he didnt get done for dangerous riding,forced his way through and caused a concertina effect,i thought was sure to be disq.

the other horse bumped the first past the post 2 out

that was pure accidental as they jumped...but app last regan has steered his horse right hampering the 2nd and forcing 2 horses right.

Can of worms only applies in Ireland - would not have lost it over here.

was a cert to lose it anywhere in uk. imo

regan caused it,he deliberately steered his horse right causing a concertina effect.

Horse at Worcester got barged into the rails on the run-in a few seasons ago.  Winner kept it and only lost it on appeal a week later!

well we know the results are consistent,but thats expected when its a majority decision.

Give me an example of a horse that has been disqualified in Britain for interference at the second last hurdle?

Ironically he would have got away with it if his infringement was confined to the runner up but coupled with the move across the other front runners cooked his goose.

andy tell me how many other races to your memory, has a winner been chucked for what happened between the last 2 flights in a race? i can't remember one, yes o'regan manouvre 2 out when trying to find space wasn't great riding but i cannot recollect a reversal like this before, add to which every race round that bend today into the straight at listowel i saw some interference

the interference wasnt 2 out,it was approaching the last,and i agree with punch,the manouvrve was borderline dangerous,i was suprised it took so long tbh.

tis no fiff to the same manoeuvre happening 1.5f out on the flat.

The incident took place after jumping the second last hurdle.

after jumping 2 out isnt 2 out.

It certainly isn't approaching the last either!

If you watch it again DOR's horse is slightly awkward at the second last which kind of nudged him towards the eventual winner,DOR then decided he was going directly right irrespective of who or what was there already causing the well described concertina effect.

regan made no manoeuvre till midway between 2 and 1 out,that imo is classed as approaching the last.  is it not?

He would have got away with the initial slight bump but not part 2.

correct.

There was a similar disqualification a good few years back in Ireland. I can't remember the track or the name of the horse that I backed but he jumped across the runner up at the 2nd last hurdle causing the runner up to make a mistake. My horse was disqualified as the stewards decided if the 2nd hadn't made the mistake he would have won, the winning margin was much greater than the short head margin today.

The Stewards enquired into possible interference between the last two hurdles involving Torcello, ridden by B.J. Cooper, placed fifth, Gold Seal, ridden by E.T. Daly, placed second, Kuiper Belt (USA), ridden by D.F. O'Regan, placed first and Galtymore, ridden by S.A. Mulcahy, placed sixth, where it appeared that Kuiper Belt (USA) in manoeuvering outwards caused a concertina effect of interference. Evidence was heard from the riders concerned. Having viewed the recording of the race and considered the evidence, the Stewards were satisfied that Kuiper Belt (USA) had improved his placing in relation to Gold Seal by causing interference and consequently reversed the placings of those horses with the result now to read; First - Gold Seal, Second - Kuiper Belt (USA), Third - Randalls Ur Poet, Fourth - Lucky Icon, Fifth - Torcello, Sixth - Galtymore and Seventh - Masterstonemason. Furthermore the Stewards were of the opinion that D.F. O'Regan was in breach of Rule 214 by riding carelessly and suspended him for 2 racedays having taken his previous record into consideration.

i think I remember a race at Chester where interference occurred very early in the race and got chucked. Think Cunningham spotted it on RUK.

hulk23    11 Sep 18 16:05
chucked out, no brainer ...

and odd against,wd,must have copped the lot.


wasnt it 1.3 to get it at the suspend :/

Lucky only 2 get 2 days imo.

it was odds against when the betting opened.

only 2 people in britain would have noticed that dangleflaps .... maybe that should be 3

hulk23    11 Sep 18 16:00 
11/2 to keep the races

impossible,the 2nd never went below 1.28 in the stewards.

ok.  how high did the original winner go ?

winner was around 1.6 when it opened,so 2nd must of been 2.5 ish.

shaftoflaps bet the winner when he saw no interference on the run-in, first thing he looks for.  probably had some of the photo as well given that it wasn't even close (1.02 - 1.04 free money) ... he wouldn't look that far back for interference and 99.9% of the time he'd be right not to ...

hes stated many times he doesnt bet away from the track,but probably did his money in the photo agreed.