Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
dyno-layer
09 Sep 18 10:52
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Jun 03
| Topic/replies: 858 | Blogger: dyno-layer's blog
NINE ELEVEN TWO THOUSAND & ONE.

As we approach the 17th Anniversary of that most tragic of days,  I decided to open up a thread and leave a couple of links which may be useful to anyone who wants to revisit the event and to consider some relatively new ( and some not so new but hidden from mainstream media ) information which casts an enormous shadow over the official narrative which is still,almost unbelievably, in the history books. I wonder what the modern day history classes of the latest generation are being taught by their tutors in respect of the vanishing WTC towers ???

I am not going to offer my own opinion as it matters not and will give added reason for trolls to descend upon the thread although i expect the " keyboard experts with no evidence to back up their spurious input " will arrive any time soon. i will simply list links which i found informative and helpful which I invite you to view objectively and run your own chain of thought through the presentations.

Here is the link for a recent documentary/ Investigation carried out by a young guy called Chris Hampton. In respect of copyright infringement his original presentation was taken down by Youtube but as i type the updated version is still available.

911 ALCHEMY = FACING REALITY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Zz04_-f0GE


This is also available to view on his own website WOLF CLAN MEDIA

This presentation predominantly deals with the four reported plane crashes in relation to the 911 attack and is approximately 3 hours in duration. It is compulsive viewing.

I would also recommend you consider viewing the following.

IRREFUTABLE  - 911

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgyWhdSe0Yc


Evidence based documentary regarding the WTC towers.

In addition .

CHECKtheEVIDENCE.COM is a comprehensive research hub which has many points of interest.

http://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/

RICHPLANET.TV has various interviews contained on his platform which are enlightening

https://www.richplanet.net/

9/11 TRILLIONS : FOLLOW THE MONEY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3xgjxJwedA


Interesting analysis from James Corbett who covers the events leading up the attack.

Corbett has also produced documentaries covering potential suspects for the crime which are well worth looking up.

There are 3 books which are well worth reading,

FINDING THE TRUTH and HOLDING THE TRUTH both written by Andrew Johnson and available as FOC PDF downloads from his website Checktheevidence.com

Last but not least probably the most informative book ever written about the subject

WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO ? written by Dr Judy Wood.

There is a fabulous array of information documented above and early this coming week the racing is extremely poor. Take a day off, keep an open mind and consider the evidence.

Frankly I am not sure if there is anything the common man can do in order to stand up against this type of perpetrator but being armed with the knowledge presented may help. There are some pretty determined truth seeking baton carriers listed above who have pure and simply put their lives on the line over this and is some cases ruined their careers in the name of the justice.

Thank you for reading.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 55
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 09 Sep 18 10:55
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 09 Sep 18 10:55
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 09 Sep 18 11:14
chit - chat .
By:
grappler
When: 09 Sep 18 11:17
you have to hand it to the u.s. perpetrators. they have pulled of a mind-boggling feat of mass slaughter of their own people in the most gruesome way, a act of staggering logistical complexity and expense, in total secrecy for all of the several hundred people involved planning and executing it. the greatest, most brutally cynical false flag operation of all time was accomplished without of the conspirators breaking rank, cracking under the pressure, accidentally letting it slip, or turning whistle-blower.

nor have any enemies of the u.s. like russia or iran or china who, of course, know the truth, bothered to advertise it. on top of that, they managed to frame 20 innocent saudi islmao-loons for the crime. a work of genius. the only comparable rival is putins blowing up russian apartment blocks to bolster support for his destruction of chechnya. a few holes in that caper's storyline, but still a good effort
By:
grappler
When: 09 Sep 18 11:19
^*any of the conspirators
By:
Zsa_Zsa_Gabors_Leg
When: 09 Sep 18 11:25
Well put Grappler
By:
lead on
When: 09 Sep 18 11:49
belongs on chit chat although there may be no room there...apparently been overrun by mice
By:
DenzilPenberthy
When: 09 Sep 18 12:39
Should've waited til Tuesday.
By:
mouse muldoon
When: 09 Sep 18 12:43
I'm bringing the wine
By:
Charlton2005
When: 09 Sep 18 14:57
walofs

well said zsa zsa
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 09 Sep 18 15:10
i would rather listen to marts " garbled diatribe " than listen to any of the above. !!  Laugh
By:
dyno-layer
When: 10 Sep 18 10:46
Yes . Fair play. I should have posted the thread tomorrow and also put it on chit chat rather than the HR forum.  Apologies if i upset anyone.

Grappler. Thanks for that. You nailed it. An incredible act of secrecy to hide one of the worst criminal acts in recent history if not all time,

For many a day i had pondered what really happened and i could never actually grasp it. I stumbled across much of this during bland racing days and i just thought i would share as it is a topic that carries such a weight of interest among many.

There are still gaps as it is hard for us at this time to comprehend the type of technology which could have been developed  / weaponised and used at this atrocity and in truth we probably wont get to know during our lifetime.
By:
Charlton2005
When: 10 Sep 18 21:19
you're a difficult read dino

rico, this guy for real?
By:
Virgin
When: 11 Sep 18 08:14
27.30 in the first video .... the moon-walking bear was an eye-opener Shocked
By:
saddo
When: 11 Sep 18 09:05
Lmao, it was indeed.
By:
Charlton2005
When: 11 Sep 18 09:53
gotta love it when these theorists say "the plane could not have done that to the building. there is no debate"

jesus christ
By:
Davros
When: 11 Sep 18 11:35
Clearly the towers were vaporised by Emperor Ming's death ray - if only Flash Gordon were still alive, he'd have dome something.

Idiotic nonsense from people monetising tragedy.  Pathetic and infantile.
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 11 Sep 18 11:57
I have not watched all of the information yet but i cannot believe that i fell for the original bull and believed it for so many years. Just trying to get my head around the perishing towers as i hadnt ever seen anything quite like that before ?? Unreal. I suppose everyone will see it differently hence why the massive cover up has been able to stay in place for such a long time ?
By:
sageform
When: 11 Sep 18 11:59
I am not really interested in alternative theories but one thing is for sure. The world changed that day in a fundamental way and all of our lives have been changed as a result.
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 11 Sep 18 12:03
The dancing bear clip was enlightening. Very few would have noticed that at all. Perception management. seeing what they want you to see and not what is really happening
By:
Mat22
When: 11 Sep 18 12:32
What a Horrific choice for those poor people who ended up jumping or falling out of those towers, The Visual casualties.
A very Sad Day Regardless of who the perpetrators were!
By:
wondersobright
When: 11 Sep 18 12:48
there are as many inconsistencies in the alternative theories as there are in the official story imo but 1 thing that is incontrovertably complete and utter bollox is that commercial aeroplanes can be flown at speeds in excess of over 500mph at low altitude, let alone be directed manually into tall buildingz at the 1st attempt by inexperienced pilots
By:
wondersobright
When: 11 Sep 18 12:49
*buildings
By:
Charlton2005
When: 11 Sep 18 12:51
incontrovertably complete and utter bollox is that commercial aeroplanes can be flown at speeds in excess of over 500mph at low altitude, let alone be directed manually into tall buildingz at the 1st attempt by inexperienced pilots

is there a proof for this?
By:
dustybin
When: 11 Sep 18 12:57
I personally dont honestly care who did it, it was a mighty spectacle either way and one had you learned of it happening 100 years ago you would never have believed it.
By:
wondersobright
When: 11 Sep 18 13:01

Sep 11, 2018 -- 7:51AM, Charlton2005 wrote:


incontrovertably complete and utter bollox is that commercial aeroplanes can be flown at speeds in excess of over 500mph at low altitude, let alone be directed manually into tall buildingz at the 1st attempt by inexperienced pilotsis there a proof for this?


just read about commercial aeroplane maximum speeds at low altitude...circa 300mph at the most

the official report has the aeroplanes hitting with speeds in excess of 500mph

By:
Charlton2005
When: 11 Sep 18 13:07
absolute garbage which even very simple google will establish

in any event, are you claiming the plane did not hit the tower or was not going that fast?
By:
dustybin
When: 11 Sep 18 13:08
Im still trying to see what happened on 9th of November?
By:
womenandthosewithnointerestinracing
When: 11 Sep 18 13:09
Wheres Shafter's p&l for 30th March?
By:
wondersobright
When: 11 Sep 18 13:20

Sep 11, 2018 -- 8:07AM, Charlton2005 wrote:


absolute garbage which even very simple google will establishin any event, are you claiming the plane did not hit the tower or was not going that fast?


no I don't dispute the speed, its the speed that makes me incredibly suspicious of the official story

we will never know but my view is that it was some kind of modified aircraft which was remotely directed as I do not believe even an experienced pilot could pull off what happened

By:
wondersobright
When: 11 Sep 18 13:22
the flight paths (of the tower planes) crossing over the privately owned air base is a big clue imo
By:
Charlton2005
When: 11 Sep 18 13:26
ok, so you said "incontrovertably complete and utter bollox"

i said, "is there a proof for this"

then you said "i do not believe"



if anyone ever needs an example of churchills explanation as to why democracy doesnt work...see the above
By:
wondersobright
When: 11 Sep 18 13:32
then you said "i do not believe"
Laugh where ffs
By:
Charlton2005
When: 11 Sep 18 13:34
wondersobright 11 Sep 18 14:20 Joined: 13 Jun 06 | Topic/replies: 54,170 | Blogger: wondersobright's blog
Sep 11, 2018 -- 2:07PM, Charlton2005 wrote:

absolute garbage which even very simple google will establishin any event, are you claiming the plane did not hit the tower or was not going that fast?


no I don't dispute the speed, its the speed that makes me incredibly suspicious of the official story

we will never know but my view is that it was some kind of modified aircraft which was remotely directed as I do not believe even an experienced pilot could pull off what happened
By:
wondersobright
When: 11 Sep 18 13:40
that wasn't directly in reply to you asking for proof, hence the my view is that
there is plenty out there online (not even related to 9/11) about the capability of commercial airlines so do your research and believe what you want to believe
By:
Charlton2005
When: 11 Sep 18 13:43
of course it is in response

you implied it was impossible

i asked for a proof of the impossibility

you then watered it down to effectively "in my opinion"

i.e. i am 100% certain...er no i'm not... i just believe
By:
Charlton2005
When: 11 Sep 18 13:44
"a 5 minute conversation with the average voter"
By:
wondersobright
When: 11 Sep 18 13:56
Charlton2005 • September 11, 2018 2:43 PM BST
of course it is in response


as I've already said, no it wasn't

I'm not engaging in these petty circular arguments so you are blocked now
By:
womenandthosewithnointerestinracing
When: 11 Sep 18 14:00
Andrew will know what speed they can do at that altitude.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com