|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
chit - chat .
|
|
By:
you have to hand it to the u.s. perpetrators. they have pulled of a mind-boggling feat of mass slaughter of their own people in the most gruesome way, a act of staggering logistical complexity and expense, in total secrecy for all of the several hundred people involved planning and executing it. the greatest, most brutally cynical false flag operation of all time was accomplished without of the conspirators breaking rank, cracking under the pressure, accidentally letting it slip, or turning whistle-blower.
nor have any enemies of the u.s. like russia or iran or china who, of course, know the truth, bothered to advertise it. on top of that, they managed to frame 20 innocent saudi islmao-loons for the crime. a work of genius. the only comparable rival is putins blowing up russian apartment blocks to bolster support for his destruction of chechnya. a few holes in that caper's storyline, but still a good effort |
|
By:
^*any of the conspirators
|
|
By:
Well put Grappler
|
|
By:
belongs on chit chat although there may be no room there...apparently been overrun by mice
|
|
By:
Should've waited til Tuesday.
|
|
By:
I'm bringing the wine
|
|
By:
walofs
well said zsa zsa |
|
By:
i would rather listen to marts " garbled diatribe " than listen to any of the above. !!
![]() |
|
By:
Yes . Fair play. I should have posted the thread tomorrow and also put it on chit chat rather than the HR forum. Apologies if i upset anyone.
Grappler. Thanks for that. You nailed it. An incredible act of secrecy to hide one of the worst criminal acts in recent history if not all time, For many a day i had pondered what really happened and i could never actually grasp it. I stumbled across much of this during bland racing days and i just thought i would share as it is a topic that carries such a weight of interest among many. There are still gaps as it is hard for us at this time to comprehend the type of technology which could have been developed / weaponised and used at this atrocity and in truth we probably wont get to know during our lifetime. |
|
By:
you're a difficult read dino
rico, this guy for real? |
|
By:
27.30 in the first video .... the moon-walking bear was an eye-opener
![]() |
|
By:
Lmao, it was indeed.
|
|
By:
gotta love it when these theorists say "the plane could not have done that to the building. there is no debate"
jesus christ |
|
By:
Clearly the towers were vaporised by Emperor Ming's death ray - if only Flash Gordon were still alive, he'd have dome something.
Idiotic nonsense from people monetising tragedy. Pathetic and infantile. |
|
By:
I have not watched all of the information yet but i cannot believe that i fell for the original bull and believed it for so many years. Just trying to get my head around the perishing towers as i hadnt ever seen anything quite like that before ?? Unreal. I suppose everyone will see it differently hence why the massive cover up has been able to stay in place for such a long time ?
|
|
By:
I am not really interested in alternative theories but one thing is for sure. The world changed that day in a fundamental way and all of our lives have been changed as a result.
|
|
By:
The dancing bear clip was enlightening. Very few would have noticed that at all. Perception management. seeing what they want you to see and not what is really happening
|
|
By:
What a Horrific choice for those poor people who ended up jumping or falling out of those towers, The Visual casualties.
A very Sad Day Regardless of who the perpetrators were! |
|
By:
there are as many inconsistencies in the alternative theories as there are in the official story imo but 1 thing that is incontrovertably complete and utter bollox is that commercial aeroplanes can be flown at speeds in excess of over 500mph at low altitude, let alone be directed manually into tall buildingz at the 1st attempt by inexperienced pilots
|
|
By:
*buildings
|
|
By:
incontrovertably complete and utter bollox is that commercial aeroplanes can be flown at speeds in excess of over 500mph at low altitude, let alone be directed manually into tall buildingz at the 1st attempt by inexperienced pilots
is there a proof for this? |
|
By:
I personally dont honestly care who did it, it was a mighty spectacle either way and one had you learned of it happening 100 years ago you would never have believed it.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
absolute garbage which even very simple google will establish
in any event, are you claiming the plane did not hit the tower or was not going that fast? |
|
By:
Im still trying to see what happened on 9th of November?
|
|
By:
Wheres Shafter's p&l for 30th March?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
the flight paths (of the tower planes) crossing over the privately owned air base is a big clue imo
|
|
By:
ok, so you said "incontrovertably complete and utter bollox"
i said, "is there a proof for this" then you said "i do not believe" if anyone ever needs an example of churchills explanation as to why democracy doesnt work...see the above |
|
By:
then you said "i do not believe"
where ffs |
|
By:
wondersobright 11 Sep 18 14:20 Joined: 13 Jun 06 | Topic/replies: 54,170 | Blogger: wondersobright's blog
Sep 11, 2018 -- 2:07PM, Charlton2005 wrote: absolute garbage which even very simple google will establishin any event, are you claiming the plane did not hit the tower or was not going that fast? no I don't dispute the speed, its the speed that makes me incredibly suspicious of the official story we will never know but my view is that it was some kind of modified aircraft which was remotely directed as I do not believe even an experienced pilot could pull off what happened |
|
By:
that wasn't directly in reply to you asking for proof, hence the my view is that
there is plenty out there online (not even related to 9/11) about the capability of commercial airlines so do your research and believe what you want to believe |
|
By:
of course it is in response
you implied it was impossible i asked for a proof of the impossibility you then watered it down to effectively "in my opinion" i.e. i am 100% certain...er no i'm not... i just believe |
|
By:
"a 5 minute conversation with the average voter"
|
|
By:
Charlton2005 • September 11, 2018 2:43 PM BST
of course it is in response as I've already said, no it wasn't I'm not engaging in these petty circular arguments so you are blocked now |
|
By:
Andrew will know what speed they can do at that altitude.
|