There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 130 comments are related to the topic:
tommy robinson
tommy robinson
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 130
|
By:
salaam alaikum
 |
|
By:
You don't promote peace people like you give the good muslims a bad name.
|
|
By:
Don't worry Denzil, you've always got Nick Griffin to fall back on for a few weeks.
That's about the 3rd time today I've been called a paedophile or sex trafficker for trying to reason with the dangerous right-wing fanatics on here. If you have to deflect from issue in that way then fine, but don't ever call me a copper! |
|
By:
I've never called you a paedo or the likes you called me a hateful version of 1 of the apostles,beyond the facts about the hateful actions of muslim paedophile grooming gang rapists and our authorities who deliberately enabled (and still are) the crimes nobody has been called names in the last week when a couple should've been.
You're miles away with the right wing stuff it's a coincidence that those are the only people who are trying to keep it public or is it? |
|
By:
Man Unhappy with mass rape Nationwide ,Turns up to do do a small bit of coverage of the Possible perps , He Ends up in Jail
 U cannot make it up If Robinson had been entering Court Accused of Something and we had a Luvvie videoing that, would he end up in Prison ?? People have Ignored or covered up Mass Rape and Criminal activities Nationwide , it is still going on with serious Drug and Gang crime also being Ignored in Various communities/areas , Let them crack on Ignoring it Denzil , Give it 15 20 Years and you are in the wrong part of the UK the Luvvies will see how Luvvie some people feel about them  The old addage Give an inch ,Some of our Luvvie friends and family members may well be taking a few unwanted inches . |
|
By:
3 times across both threads.
Robinson and his ilk are not on your side, he's laughing at you cos he's a multi millionaire off the back of winding up the feeble minded. He's a fugazi and will probably get more €€€ in donations in the next few weeks than he could ever dream of earning outside. He's basically monetised fascism and seems to get full support on here for doing so. A pressure group I could get behind, but Yaxley-Lennon and his followers are extremists; the message is lost and they're more like terrorists in my eyes. |
|
By:
Richie_Burnett • July 12, 2019 12:28 AM BST
3 times across both threads You are completely wrong there I've never called you a paedo or the likes on this thread or the other. Please post proof if you maintain that's the case. |
|
By:
The fact that there are enough people on here willing to defend the likes of Robinson and there actions / beliefs, is frightening enough in itself.
We keep hearing about rape gangs and the like, a hideous crime, but why do the race of the people carrying out these crimes, have to be brought into it? Let's tell it as it is, it's convenient and fits a purpose of the likes of Robinson and more crucially anyone who supports him. All put together it just goes to show how fecked the country has actually become. Those involved in peddling support of violence against someone because of their race should be ashamed of themselves and ask how they'd like to be treated if they lived in a foreign country. |
|
By:
Somerset Sam there's so much wrong in your post it beggars belief.
For starters there's NOBODY PEDDLING SUPPORT OF VIOLENCE AGAINST ANYONE BECAUSE OF RACE OR RELIGION FOR THAT MATTER THAT IS ABSOLUTE FICTION. You hear about rape gangs relative to RELIGION NOT RACE and for good reason,90 odd percent of them ARE MUSLIM with 80 odd percent being BRITISH MUSLIM PAKISTANI and it usually isn't mentioned though should be. This has nothing to do with people that support Robinson these muslim grooming gang paedophile rapes were going on when the likes of Tommy Robinson were still at school. The country is fecked mainly due to the corruption of the authorities (who have kept this under wraps deliberately enabling it from the start and still are) and mainstream media add that to gullible people who take it all in this continues to be allowed to happen. What about the 1000s of raped girls and their families some of which have been prosecuted themselves for daring to accuse muslim rapists of such crimes despite them being as guilty as sin. The mainstream news have left many details from their news items as well as many double standards,for the likes of you Somerset Sam I suggest you do some proper research and put some effort in judging HONESTLY before posting absolute drivel like what's above. If you are interested (probably won't be as not many can judge like for like without bias) watch the link below to start off some of your post will get answers,some dilligent posters have kindly given lots of good information on these issues on chit chat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrUiHB5qJJ0 |
|
By:
Read your 1st line then laughed, shook my head and then wrote this: you're blocked you absolute throbber.
I'm embarrassed for you, your family and anyone else who even remotely thinks like you. |
|
By:
Well done Somerset Sam you are clearly a dishonest type who is unwilling to look beyond a pre determined bias in case you discover some truths you don't like.
You can't offend me SS plenty try I only post truths no fear for honest men. |
|
By:
Read your 1st line then laughed, shook my head and then wrote this: you're blocked you absolute throbber.
That says alot more about you than it does about me. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
The people Robinson was targeting had been arrested and were on trial for their actions so whatever went on before or elsewhere there was no cover-up at the time for them. If you were a conspiracy theorist you could see his actiona as being designed to free these people by ruining their trials. I am not so I don't,though I suspect Robinson would have made the most of it if that is what happened.
I basically agree with Richie that he is an obnoxious little p**** more interested in being famous and making money out of the types who have posted on his behalf on this thread rather than some sort of patriotic superhero. |
|
By:
Too much like hard work or doesn't fit a certain criteria? Any sane, rational human being can clearly see what the bigger picture and motivation is, a growing number sadly can't.
Maybe if you looked beyond your own tunnel vision you could search and find plenty of truths that don't or won't get reported - because it doesn't fit the agenda of the corrupt media or the loony left who think we should tolerate everything that is thrown at us. Regardless of what Robinson has done here, it is pretty obvious there is a massive issue with the race/religion of these grooming gangs of paedophiles, whether or not you want to believe that or not. Paxman was told years before it properly came out this was happening only for him to basically laugh about the accusations, because he couldn't see past who was telling him that. The country is in the gutter and is getting worse by the day/week/month due to all these liberal loonies and the pathetic PC brigade. Where we will be in 20 years time is anyones guess, but it won't be a pretty sight imo if we carry on as we are with no backbone. |
|
By:
salmon spray
'.......I basically agree with Richie that he is an obnoxious little p**** more interested in being famous and making money out of the types who have posted on his behalf on this thread rather than some sort of patriotic superhero.....' Totally agree |
|
By:
you could be one of the coppers who finds a couple of naked 13 year olds with 7 Pakistani men in a house and arrests the girls.
This I meant, DenzilPenberthy. I'm certainly not a paedo sympathiser. |
|
By:
90 odd percent of them ARE MUSLIM with 80 odd percent being BRITISH MUSLIM PAKISTANI and it usually isn't mentioned though should be.
First off - it is always mentioned after the trial so i really don't know what news you watch. Of the gangs Lennon 'exposes' yes those figs are prob right but are you seriously suggesting that (big) networks of white peados aren't operating countrywide? Apparently they don't make you lot as angry and don't need exposing or reporting on, it's just when brown people do it that you get really angry - mind you with the far right's long and proud tradition of links to peado networks then i can't say i am surprised. The thing is if that broadcast hadn't been stopped then there is a v good chance that 2 peado trials would have been halted as i believe 1 of those whose names he said was in both trials hence the reporting restrictions - would you have then been up in arms that the actions of Lennon had caused 2 gangs to walk free - no obv that would have been the courts' fault as well! Considering his supporters seem to have first hand knowledge of the justice system it seems many do not understand how it works so here is the TR case in less than 40 words: Man commits crime and posts video on internet, man is warned if he does the same again he will face a jail term, man commits same crime and posts on internet, man goes to jail. That is it. |
|
By:
9 months in prison for Tommy Robinson is a disgrace..he'll be out in 4½ ffs..pathetic
|
|
By:
Robinson's supporters are so thick they can't see that they're Messiah's actions could have halted the trials and led to the perpetrators being freed. Robinson's just an obnoxious hooligan feeding his ego and his bank balance.
|
|
By:
/\ their
|
|
By:
Can someone explain why in the instance of the trial he was filming outside of, was it a media blackout? From what I gather it is so a jury will not be swayed and make a judgement before a trial has even started. Now I get that and that is fair enough, but how many trials have this stipulated beforehand? There are trials everyday where so much has been "alledged" and reported before the trial within the media, so why were these trials so different and no reporting allowed?
|
|
By:
the main difference is that there were 3 linked trials, about 9-10 months apart
call them 'a', 'b' and 'c' some blokes were involved in more than one of the three, so restrictions were in place from start of first trial 'a' to end of third trial 'c' (as far as we know restrictions were to be lifted after trial 'c',) yaxley lennon broadcast outside and during trial a and b but before 'c' had started but filming some of the blokes who would be on trial at trial 'c' because they were involved in trial 'a' or 'b' |
|
By:
spyker you also have posted some drivel which include false racial slurs.
Have said on every thread this is nothing to do with race you are seemingly biased so you ignore those posts. Can you please post all the relevant info regarding (big) networks of white paedos that are operating countrywide I'm interested in keeping all conversation and awareness up of all such disgusting activity as it's still being swept under the carpet. The numbers you open your post with that I wrote are correct regarding the muslim paedophile rapist grooming gangs,I look forward to your reply. |
|
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
I understand that, but how can someone be in the news daily alledged to have done something and charged awaiting trial, and then have a fair trial 6 months down the line, when the media are reporting what it wants to report up until that trial? Those on the jury could easily have been swayed surely? What is the difference with naming those involved in that paedophile ring and them then going to trial 6 months down the line? I just do not see why this had a media blackout just because they are involved in more than one case, and other alleged criminals can be named prior to their trials. |
|
By:
Magic___Daps - Media blackouts are designed to hide uncomfortable truths . Something that was used only as a security measure during times of war , as a necessity , are now quite commonplace for purely political purposes .
|
|
By:
dont think Tommy Robinson was trial by jury, Magic
|
|
By:
Reporting restrictions are very common in criminal trials
|
|
By:
Robinson was a proper mug here, trying to livestream this. He usually films his stuff first so he can edit out anything that shows him in a negative light before he uploads it to Youtube. I'll accept that when he stated "harass them" the original context was directed at the other journalists present but it's easy to see how that segment of the film could be construed as incitement by the less refined elements among his supporters.
|
|
By:
Magic__Daps
With a normal trial, the media aren't allowed to report what they want, only the basic facts of the accused's name and the charges. The jury aren't told of any prior convictions to ensure the case is tried only the evidence. When there's a series of trials, if the defendants in the first trial were publicly identified a jury at the later trial might suppose they must be guilty if the defendant has faced multiple charges. In the cae of Robinson, the judge also decided his recordings could have led to vigilante action. |
|
By:
xmas prison meals are horrible
|
|
By:
Previous convictions are now admissible in certain circumstances.
As a defendant During the trial of a criminal charge, reference to previous convictions (and therefore to spent convictions) can arise in a number of ways. The most common is when a bad character application is made under the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Much of this depends on whether you make a point as part of your case about your character – i.e. if you state you are of good character, the other side would be entitled to adduce evidence of your bad character in the form of your previous convictions. When considering bad character applications under the 2003 Act, regard should always be had to the general principles of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974. |
|
By:
xmas prison meals are horrible
... wont affect him if he is out in September. |
|
By:
But his missus is a sh!t cook by all accounts.
|
|
By:
out in September.
 |
|
By:
september never ends
|
|
By:
- Tommy Robinson has been given a nine-month prison sentence – of which he will serve about 10 weeks.
|
|
By:
https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/guides/the-sub-judice-rule-and-contempt-of-court
Yaxley-Lennon completely bang to rights. Absurd he wasted the court's time with this appeal. |
|
By:
Correct Dave
|
|
By:
In the TR case he used information that was ALREADY in the public domain and his lawyer read out in an earlier trial over 300+ journalists and broadcasters that had named and shown photos of the defendants before he did,the trial was also over and they were waiting for sentencing.
There was also no notification on the judiciaries website stating that there were reporting restrictions for journalists this has been proven in court. They've had to add charges to get a conviction here like: Breaching Reporting Restrictions Causing the defendants anxiety Taking pictures of the defendants Inciting vigilante justice First one -not guity Third one -not guilty otherwise the likes of the BBC etc are too Fourth one -words fail me Second one do these paedophiles who groom drug and gang rape young girls look like nervous types: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAwsLcVMDpY Some links to contempt of court trials below with the charges,outcomes and sentences feel free to say these are fair compared to the TR punishments it's a good test of honesty and bias. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/rod-liddle-is-let-off-despite-almost-causing-lawrence-trial-to-collapse-7826947.html https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20031173 |