It's not about getting them 'right' , they are a guide ............... I don't advocate (and never have advocated) backing the top rated blind , although any idiot who decided to do so at York would have yielded a 19% profit to level stakes ! I continue to fail to see the point of this individuals criticism
It's not about getting them 'right' , they are a guide ............... I don't advocate (and never have advocated) backing the top rated blind , although any idiot who decided to do so at York would have yielded a 19% profit to level stakes ! I conti
100% agree reynard. the trifecta in the last race on day 1 a good case in point, as is ghostwatch a 16/1 winner that you had 2nd rated.
no idea what this chavs comments are for
100% agree reynard. the trifecta in the last race on day 1 a good case in point, as is ghostwatch a 16/1 winner that you had 2nd rated.no idea what this chavs comments are for
I would also point out that I am more than happy to respond to requests to analyse any specific race beforehand from a combined perspective involving Ratings and Form . For example Battaash was top rated in the Nunthorpe but I suggested that it was a 'lay' at 4/6 . A statement that proved correct yet still resulted in a barrage of nonsense from the 'aforementioned' . I have always stated that my Ratings are based on a Statistical Formula and should be used in conjunction with ones own form analysis , a fact that some still fail (or choose to fail) to grasp .
I would also point out that I am more than happy to respond to requests to analyse any specific race beforehand from a combined perspective involving Ratings and Form . For example Battaash was top rated in the Nunthorpe but I suggested that it was a