Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
TheBaron
28 Jul 18 18:08
Joined:
Date Joined: 18 Jan 08
| Topic/replies: 2,389 | Blogger: TheBaron's blog
If the in running price of two horses(one with a SP of 2.5 the other 10.0) drops to 2.0 at the same time, statistically would the horse with the lower SP win more often or would the SP make no difference to the result?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 25
By:
Deltâ
When: 28 Jul 18 18:13
yes
By:
onlooker
When: 28 Jul 18 18:24
No
By:
womenandthosewithnointerestinracing
When: 28 Jul 18 18:25
maybe
By:
duncan idaho
When: 28 Jul 18 18:27
which osses?
By:
layemall
When: 28 Jul 18 18:27
sorry
By:
pablo-fanque
When: 28 Jul 18 18:31
don't know
By:
brassneck
When: 28 Jul 18 18:59
perhaps
By:
womenandthosewithnointerestinracing
When: 28 Jul 18 19:01
That would be an ecumenical matter.
By:
ProSniper
When: 28 Jul 18 19:01
One suspects the SP odds are "truer" than those adjusted throughout the race. But ultimately, one couldn't say for sure without having all the facts in front of them. This is a question that could only be answered by data freaks. And you'll find they're pretty hush hush when it comes to giving out free info that they themselves have paid for..
By:
tips
When: 28 Jul 18 19:10
I would say the horse at 10 would win more often
By:
Cork Langer
When: 28 Jul 18 19:10
Dr Slicer is an authority on all matters, but haven't seen him post in a while, he would have the appropriate answer for you.
By:
womenandthosewithnointerestinracing
When: 28 Jul 18 19:11
I sayed it was an ecumenical matter Corky, NOT an epicurean won.
By:
freddiewilliams
When: 28 Jul 18 19:11
Yep the 10.0. 2.5 would easily go 2.0 in running and would mean nothing
By:
Cork Langer
When: 28 Jul 18 19:20
Immaterial Mouse, I get paid for promoting Dr Slicer, so I quote him whenever an opportunity arises...!
By:
womenandthosewithnointerestinracing
When: 28 Jul 18 19:20
Very well, send in the good doctor.
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 28 Jul 18 19:22
poor ol father ted mouse, died too early. !! Sad
By:
womenandthosewithnointerestinracing
When: 28 Jul 18 19:38
Sad fair few years ago now weren't it
By:
womenandthosewithnointerestinracing
When: 28 Jul 18 19:39
1998, aged 45
By:
freddiewilliams
When: 28 Jul 18 20:20
8.15 race 1st example
By:
womenandthosewithnointerestinracing
When: 28 Jul 18 20:38
mouse layed that won
By:
Charlton2005
When: 29 Jul 18 10:11
baron, i liken this to two golfers playing the last 4 holes of the open, one sp 5/1 one sp 500/1, now both 1/1. i would lay the 500/1 as the choke effect takes hold. this could apply to jockeys too. no doubt a system is waiting to be built on the answer to your question. a LOT of analysis needed though
By:
onlooker
When: 29 Jul 18 10:36
By  the time all that 'Analysis' had been done - referred to - and then TRIED to be applied ...

The bloody race will have been over - long ago.
By:
geoff m
When: 29 Jul 18 12:06
When 2 hosses are trading @ 2.0 by the time youve placed your back or lay its extremley unlikely they are still both trading
By:
geoff m
When: 29 Jul 18 12:06
@ 2.0  as onlooker suggested
By:
dave1357
When: 29 Jul 18 13:34

Jul 29, 2018 -- 10:11AM, Charlton2005 wrote:


baron, i liken this to two golfers playing the last 4 holes of the open, one sp 5/1 one sp 500/1, now both 1/1. i would lay the 500/1 as the choke effect takes hold. this could apply to jockeys too. no doubt a system is waiting to be built on the answer to your question. a LOT of analysis needed though


The choke factor is already in the odds which are an auction of opinions like that.

sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com