|
By:
yes
|
|
By:
No
|
|
By:
maybe
|
|
By:
which osses?
|
|
By:
sorry
|
|
By:
don't know
|
|
By:
perhaps
|
|
By:
That would be an ecumenical matter.
|
|
By:
One suspects the SP odds are "truer" than those adjusted throughout the race. But ultimately, one couldn't say for sure without having all the facts in front of them. This is a question that could only be answered by data freaks. And you'll find they're pretty hush hush when it comes to giving out free info that they themselves have paid for..
|
|
By:
I would say the horse at 10 would win more often
|
|
By:
Dr Slicer is an authority on all matters, but haven't seen him post in a while, he would have the appropriate answer for you.
|
|
By:
I sayed it was an ecumenical matter Corky, NOT an epicurean won.
|
|
By:
Yep the 10.0. 2.5 would easily go 2.0 in running and would mean nothing
|
|
By:
Immaterial Mouse, I get paid for promoting Dr Slicer, so I quote him whenever an opportunity arises...!
|
|
By:
Very well, send in the good doctor.
|
|
By:
poor ol father ted mouse, died too early. !!
![]() |
|
By:
fair few years ago now weren't it |
|
By:
1998, aged 45
|
|
By:
8.15 race 1st example
|
|
By:
mouse layed that won
|
|
By:
baron, i liken this to two golfers playing the last 4 holes of the open, one sp 5/1 one sp 500/1, now both 1/1. i would lay the 500/1 as the choke effect takes hold. this could apply to jockeys too. no doubt a system is waiting to be built on the answer to your question. a LOT of analysis needed though
|
|
By:
By the time all that 'Analysis' had been done - referred to - and then TRIED to be applied ...
The bloody race will have been over - long ago. |
|
By:
When 2 hosses are trading @ 2.0 by the time youve placed your back or lay its extremley unlikely they are still both trading
|
|
By:
@ 2.0 as onlooker suggested
|
|
By:
|