after-timing in the 1.50 Ascot

do idea why the horse was that price... top speed rating/s in the field and benefit of experience. Luke morris booked. got the game by the b@11s

The fingers never lie.

post ya restricted email later

tar

what speed ratings did the fto wons have?

slow to medium

Delta, I pay for professional software and looks at the class pars for this type of race. The lto rating for Model Guest was a number which 90% of newcomers do not achieve on debut...

Winner is Godolphin's 1000 Guineas filly. She won nicely for a hand ride as well, especially when slowly away.

KeMeH are you serious ?

The filly ran to 62 on debut and 64 last time out.

RPR have it similar.

To win an avg Ascot maiden you need to run to around 82-86

The figure that horse had previously run was far from anything special and both the Hannon and Jarvis horses who had previously ran had run better figures already.

It sounds sound you are using Proform though.

using George Margarsons own speed figures NAP

Why do aftertimers even bother?! Even worse than filthy arbers in my book.

Can't get my head round this, surely there are rules you have to follow when you're aftertiming.

domino you are a clueless mug. regardless of what you say. I'm now ££££ richer and you are still trying to sniff your way round a winner

eg 1 don't mention that you're aftertiming so epic fail KeMoH

going by RPR

this thread now whiffs of jealousy

Burkey would be proud.

A clueless mug who backed the winner then yeah ?

A clueless mug who had one bet yesterday which won.

A clueless mug who doesn't aftertime.

If you're looking for a clueless mug, go and look in a mirror and one will stare right back at you.

handbags time

pal, you backed the winner at what... odds of 4/5? I backed the second and got paid out at 30/1. I'll let you do the math

RPR are not too dissimilar to marks horses actually achieve in races there are a lot worse guides to what horses have run to out there, which cost money, including Proform, Raceform and Timeform, which aren't as effective.

I backed the winner at 7/4 actually.

The fact you can get £50 ew on a 150/1 shot, says a lot about your betting.

goodbye

Dommie countering the aftertime with won of his own.

A clueless mug who backed the winner then yeah ?

A clueless mug who had one bet yesterday which won.

A clueless mug who doesn't aftertime.

If you're looking for a clueless mug, go and look in a mirror and one will stare right back at you.

Not at all Mouse.

@Statsman

Go over yesterday, you will see, I put up AVD pre race and he was my only bet of the day.

I backed the winner at 7/4 actually.

The fact you can get £50 ew on a 150/1 shot, says a lot about your betting.

^ What about this won then? ^

I sent it at 10am to Stewart B on a PM, sent him what I was told about it, and told him to back it ante post for the Guineas at 100/1 as well.

Deltâ    27 Jul 18 14:16 

what speed ratings did the fto wons have?
----------

Indeed - of the ONLY 3 horses in the race that had run - Topspeed had it as the LOWEST Speed Figure - with a Base Rating of only 36

KeMoH has posted similar - "Top Speed Rating" - rubbish before

ffs what's going on here & what chance do mugs like me have?

lmao using topspeed from the post is for mugs, thats why 95% of you losers are in the poorhouse.

So that's ok then?

KemHo may have told one of his mates about his placed horse.

Is that ok now then?

fyi, just backed Cottontail in the 2.35 thirsk on the same market. got 25/1 for 2 places... so got paid out at 5/1. thank you very much

He wouldn't of told Stewy becoz Big D might ruin the price.

Well done

domino uses racing post predictor to come up with his selections (nap 1.01)

that john guest must be chucking margerson a few quid. 1 winner from 9 horses and 33 runs

mouse

Don't think anyone using Topspeed KeMoH, however most figure systems had the GM horse lowest scoring of the 3 that had run, although none of them had run to a figure one would normally expect to see win a Ascot maiden.

Your comment that it's figure last time (which came in a 3 runner race, where the winner won hard held) would be good enough to beat 90% of debutantes, is miles off. The 64 it ran to last time, would only normally see you finish 5th/6th in most maidens. It hadn't recorded a good figure at all.

Which I am sure will be the opinion of most people who use figures in their betting.

The ratings you use then are obviously $h!t

you can argue the toss all you like, the fact is the horse came 2nd and i was confident enough to go for 150/1 e/w two places. then spout out carp about backing a 7/4 winner.

I have the race par at 74 model guest rating where 70

Well done sir a terrific bet which was 2nd top rated on flatstats

KeMoH

The ratings I use are also used by the BHA, so every horse in racing must be given **** ratings if that's the case.

Jul 27, 2018 -- 2:50PM, posy wrote:

Well done sir a terrific bet which was 2nd top rated on flatstats

finally, a punter who knows what he is talking about

Well done domino. What price now for 1000? Wish you had sent me it

Don't know, went into a Ladbrokes shop to get a price, they gave me 100/1 for £20 ew. Wouldn't allow me anymore than that.

Ridiculous that someone who posts an interesting winning bet is immediately slated for aftertiming.The conclusion is that everyone should post details of all their bets beforehand to be allowed to talk about them on a racing forum. This forum has more than its fair share of retards.

Could you make it any more obvious you are one and the same poster?

Good God Charwell are you accusing me of being domino;if so you are mistaken as I have no insight into AOB's stable.

what you need to understand is that dom is never wrong, he knows everything about every stable, jockey and horse, you must never contradict him, he can get quite aggressive.
Just look at freds where he contradicts anybody who as on opinion on a race.

Can't see how you couldv'e backed this on its last run,was the slowest race on the card at yarmouth that's including a variety of distances/...